| About Us | Contact | Donate | User Blogs | Login |
A Perfect Setting for Sarah Palin for VP
As I've previously written here, I believe that there are two fundamental "theories" that are essential in selecting John McCain's running mate, namely: co-opting the public's desire for change, and demonstrating the desire to end "politics as usual" in Washington. There are a few Vice Presidential candidates who fulfill these criteria – namely, Governors Bobby Jindal and Sarah Palin. Since Governor Jindal has indicated that he isn't interested in the job, that leaves Sarah Palin as the best candidate under these criteria.
Indeed, with the nomination of Senator Biden as Barack Obama's running mate, there couldn't be a more perfect setting for a McCain-Palin ticket. At the most basic level, Biden detracts from the entire premise of the "hope and change" theme central to the Obama campaign – he is, as Patrick Ruffini pointed out, the longest serving legislator ever on a national ticket. Palin, on the other hand, is a Washington outsider with executive experience – and the lack of such experience on the Obama campaign is certainly something that a McCain-Palin ticket could hammer home.
The most significant benefit of Palin for VP, however, stems from the defection of former Clinton voters. By adding a dynamic and popular female Governor to the ticket, McCain could stand to make significant inroads among disaffected Clinton voters. Two recent polls indicate that there is a real opportunity for McCain to win over former Clinton supporters. The USA Today/Gallup poll shows that less than half of Clinton supporters will definitely support Obama; 30% say they will support John McCain or another candidate, and another 23% may support John McCain. The NBC/WSJ poll indicates that 21% will vote for McCain and 27% are undecided.
Therefore, it appears that McCain could win over a significant portion of former Clinton supporters – perhaps upward of 30% of them. In critical battleground states like Pennsylvania or Ohio, the Clinton factor could easily change the race in favor of McCain.
For example, in the Pennsylvania primary, 1.275 million votes were cast for Hillary Clinton. In Ohio, a similar 1.2 million votes were cast for Clinton. If just 10% of those Clinton voters were to defect to McCain, that would translate into a net gain for McCain of about 127,500 votes in Pennsylvania and 120,000 votes in Ohio. Considering that Kerry's margin of victory in 2004 in Pennsylvania was not quite 150,000 votes, winning over these disallusioned Clinton folks could prove to be a formidable edge for John McCain.
The only concern with regard to Palin's candidacy is the ongoing controversy surrounding Palin's dismissal of the Commissioner of Public Safety – however, it appears that the issue is blowing over.
There is a prospective VP nominee who could shake up this election in Governor Sarah Palin. Let's hope that when John McCain announces his running mate, it turns out to be her.
Aaron Marks is President of Three Group, LLC, a Pittsburgh-based new media firm that focuses on providing technology-based solutions for Republican candidates and organizations, and in particular has built Web 2.0 campaign management software called Mission Control. Aaron also worked in new media and voter outreach on Senator Rick Santorum's 2006 re-election campaign.
- Aaron Marks's blog
- Login or register to post comments


Comments
Re: Palin
I'd love to see Palin as the VP choice if she is throughly and completely vetted. I know she has some problems with the party in Alaska but it sounds like sour grapes to me. I'd just like to be sure of it.
I really like Bobby Jindal too and gender is the only reason that Palin could jump ahead of him for this particular election.
What about Matt Blount from Missouri? No one ever mentions him.
I really like Sarah
She is very popular in the Huckabee camp. Some or just a little nervous about how she would fare in a policy debate with Biden.
Palin Would Be A Coup For McCain
McCain got a home-run pitch right down the middle with Obama's pick of Biden. Hillary was the closest a woman ever came to becoming President, and the Republicans have a golden opportunity to capitalize on the Democrat's ugly primary.
Palin is also a solid conservative, has shown to be an effective leader in Alaska with sky-high approval ratings, and is not a creature of Washington. The recent controversy regarding Palin is trivial, in my opinion, especially considering the real scandals in Obama's and Biden's closets. If that's the worst they can get on Palin, she's in great shape.
I also can see Palin being a future leader of the Republican Party, similar to Margaret Thatcher. If the Republican Party can attract more female voters, we would be much more competetive with Democrats on a national level. To me, female voters are a much more attainable demographic for Republicans than other demographic groups that they have tried to woo the recent years. A woman on the Presidential ticket would be a big step in the right direction.
No other VP pick would give McCain the excitement and energy that Palin would, and she's popular with the conservative base to boot. A VP choice like Pawlenty would be a yawner, and probably wouldn't even deliver Minnesota for McCain. Lieberman would endanger McCain fragile relationship with the Conservative base. I see no other Republican out there that would bring as much to the table as Palin.
Excellent Insight, Jeff
Jeff -- thanks for the fantastic insight. I think you're right on with every point you made.
Palin would be the right choice
As much as I like Romney; I think he could only deliver Nevada and possible help Michigan at the cost of jeopardizing any close races in the south. Sorry Mitt your a step closer than your father and I look forward to voting for Tagg sometime in the future.
I think Marks really hit the nail on the head I had the same discussion yesterday about Palin. I just wish she didn't have that little scuff.
As for Jindal let him get two terms under his belt. Louisiana sure could use the help and it would only strengthen him as a candidate.
I'm not sure Palin is available due to her family obligations
But I agree that a strong, pro-life, conservative woman as Vice President would send an extremely powerful message to the Boys' Club which seems to be the new identity of the Democratic Party.
Since Republicans can be said to be just as guilty of Boys' Clubbiness as Democrats, the real question is whether the GOP is really ready for a woman to lead? If so, and if Palin has family obligations that will prevent her candidacy at this time, there are two other women I'd recommend just as highly. Both have strong leadership experience as CEO's, have great strength in the area of the economy, and would be tough debators - the former for certain, the latter, most likely. Their names are Carly Fiorina (former HP CEO) and Meg Whitman (former eBay CEO), and I hope that all three of these outstanding women are on the short list this week. Any one of them would be a stellar choice as a very historic Republican Vice President.
I Have A Different Take
I would argue the demands of being vice-president are, if anything, less demanding than being a Governor. The campaign over the next two months would be straining, but it's nothing like being at the top of the ticket, and enduring what John McCain will (whose 71 years old,BTW) Once you're elected, however, you have very few responsibilities compared to the Presidency.
Also, I don't think anyone is qualified to be either President or Vice-President if they have never been elected to any prior public office. The only exception, in my book, would be military leadership. I'm sure the women you mention are all intelligent people, but running a business is a lot different than public office. If these women want to pursue a political career, and I hope they do, they need to pay their dues and run for smaller elected offices first.
I would love to see these smart women continue in politics after the McCain campaign, they would be a real asset to the Republican Party in the future.