Looking Ahead on Unemployment

In taking in to account the recent statistics on unemployment dating back to the lowest rates of the Bush administration (4.4% in October 2006) and the data since that point, I have come to the conclusion that we will experience depression level unemployment (10% or more) in October 2009. A depression will likely be eminent and will become official (10% or more over two consecutive economic quarters) in March 2010.

By February 2010, one in eight Americans in the workforce will be unemployed and will be attempting to pursue employment, meeting the definition of “unemployment” according to the Bureau of Labor Statistics. By the end of 2010, the rate will reach 18.1%.

Based on data from the Bureau of Labor Statistics and projections using a polynomial trend-line, these calculations were determined with over 98% certainty that the current recession will become a depression once the summer is over with October 2009 unemployment hitting 10.7%. A depression will become official with an unemployment rate of 13% in March 2010.

By comparison, the unemployment rate from May 1979 to August 1983 increased from 5.6% to 9.5% (an increase of 69.6%). Over the ensuing 52 months (September 1983 to December 1987), unemployment dropped from 9.2% to 5.7%, a drop of 38%.

All of these calculations do not take in to account any economic impacts. The only details taken in to account are the monthly unemployment numbers from the Bureau of Labor Statistics.

5
Your rating: None Average: 5 (1 vote)

Comments

READ your numbers. 14.8% now.

Please use the U6, it is comparable to the great depression numbers, when we had 25% unemployment. Of course, it doesn't accurately model the great depression numbers, because of the increasing numbers of women in the workplace (in the great depression, if your daddy was out of a job, you had NADA -- now, if your dad or mom is out of a job, you at least have the other income -- which won't make ends meet. oh, and now we have credit cards!)

you can't pick and choose

your unemployment stats midstream of an argument.  It's dishonest.  If you're going to use one set, use it consistently.  If the U6 is high now, then it was a LOT higher during the Depression.  

umm... yeah. the u6 is the closest analogue

to the unemployment numbers during the great depression. Reagan "reduced" unemployment by removing workers from the unemployment rolls. (or LBJ, who did similarly) Blame the statistical dishonesty on him, if you like, BUT USE THE RIGHT NUMBERS.

Look at any econ blog, or go read kos for the history of unemployment numbers. They're reporting U6, because it's the accurate, comparable number.

and yes, u6 is high. at 14.8%, it is still nowhere near 25% -- great depression levels. We are in a worldwide depression, and we haven't hit bottom yet.

foundalink.

Hey! Rising Tide...

...didn't your mama every teach you how to properly post a hyperlink?

If you don't know how to get from here:

http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/2008/11/undercounting-underemployed/

To here:

Click here.

 

 Let me know. I'll be glad to show all.

ex animo

Photobucket

davidfarrar

Do tell David

I'd love to learn how to properly embed links. Especially how to embed them in the text of the post "under" highlighted words of the text. As well as the styles you showed above.

Thanks

Update

Looking at the numbers updated Sunday at The Financial Forecast Center (www.forecasts.org), the expected date of the unemployment rate hitting 10% is set for August 2009.  I did not have the rate hitting double digits until October (98% certainty).