ACORN and the Sandlers: Part II of IV

Last week while President Obama was announcing an ambition plan to aid foreclosure victims, ACORN launched a national campaign that seemed to target the administration. Oddly enough, last week a secret meeting was held atthe DC Federal shakedown headquarters for ACORN located at 739 8th SE in Washington, DC that lasted most of the day. In attendance were top ACORN management staff and officials from either Fannie Mae or Freddie Mac. Of course, 2008 was not a stellar year for either ACORN or Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac. Dave Barry hilariously offers a bit of satire to explain the latter's fall in his year in review:

"January: ... in what some economists see as a troubling sign, Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac invest $12.7 billion in Powerball tickets.

September: The federal government is finally forced to take over Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac after they are caught selling crack at a middle school.”

ACORN's meeting signals some troubling prospects for most Americans, especially after its most recent partnership with Herb and Marion Sandler, formerly of Golden West. According to donor records the Sandlers have provided ACORN Housing and other affiliates millions upon millions of dollars (this does not even include the money for “voter registration” given to Project Vote). The Sandlers have also provided training and support to ACORN field operations. A December 2006 report details the Sandlers involvement in restructuring ACORN after the intense scrutiny and investigations that followed the 2006 elections.

Structure

Herb and Marian Sandler provided generous support for an outside review of ACORN Field Operations and related activity in order to allow us – with help! – to assess our infrastructure requirements and needs. Many of the recommendations were based on common sense conclusions rooted in fundamental efficiencies to Field Operations, including increased centralization, streamlined and direct management accountability, upgrades in training, recruitment, and placement, among other suggestions...

We continue to be highly engaged in puzzling out some of the programs, including examining structural issues around management operations, departmental organizations, and other areas with institutional importance and support. We also are still working with the Sandlers to come to an understanding of where they may be willing to support increased field capacity.

ACORN will tell you that there is nothing wrong with this relationship and of course, that may be true. However, it is interesting to see the way Well Fargo was attacked by ACORN at the same time that Golden West, operating under the name World Savings, was underwriting ACORN Housing loans.

ACORN National President Maude Hurd announced ACORN's lawsuit against Wells Fargo in front of the company's Los Angeles offices

ACORN continued our national campaign, started in 2003, to change the predatory lending practices of Wells Fargo, one of the largest subprime lenders in the U.S. In addition to a full menu of rallies and demonstrations, ACORN used some of the tactics that successfully forced Household Finance to reform its practices. First, we appealed to Wells shareholders by working with Responsible Wealth to file a shareholder resolution at Wells’ annual meeting that called for executive compensation to be tied to efforts to end predatory lending within the company. Second, ACORN filed three lawsuits against Wells, two national lawsuits in California and one class action lawsuit in Illinois. Finally, filed complaints and met with a number of state and federal regulators. In Louisiana, the Attorney General issued Wells a civil investigative demand, while in Maryland the Human Rights Commission is officially investigating the company.

Wells Fargo apparently refused to bow to ACORN's demands for money at first (as detailed in a previous blog.) According to donor records the Sandlers paid on time and regularly, and this incentive led ACORN to apparently choose to turn a blind eye to what Elizabeth MacDonald called:

 

“...a mom and pop shop that went berserk rubberstamping reckless loans for the worst of California’s borrowers, as the country’s biggest purveyor of the option ARM, which lets borrowers set which payments they want to make, in many cases, interest-only payments on no-doc loans.

These ARMs are the worst of the lot, and they are now adjusting to higher rates, providing an economic effect that is the equivalent of the levees breaking in New Orleans."

Ed Lasky's article in the American Thinker illustrates the role of Herb and Marion Sandler in the subprime meltdown.

Herbert and Marion Sandler, a New York lawyer and Wall Street analyst respectively, bought a small California thrift in 1963 and built it into GDW -- one of the largest thrifts in the nation. The company's business was built on adjustable rate mortgages (ARMs. These were mortgages offered at low "teaser" rates that ratcheted upward as interest rates increased. They were often sold aggressively to unsophisticated home buyers who did not comprehend the vast financial risks they were taking, or who assumed that housing prices would rise high enough to provide a profit to them when they sold their houses. They were targets for lenders peddling mortgages that should have been stamped with a skull and crossbones, for these were among the most seductive and dangerous types of mortgage.

Lasky goes not to note that groups like ACORN “might also have played a role in the expansion of such mortgages to borrowers who may have lacked the ability to repay the loans.” According internal documents, ACORN Housing often used income that was considered “under the table” in order to qualify its applicants for loans. Lenders like World Savings and Bank of America were long time partners who seemed to also benefit (at the time) from these subprime loans.

An October 4, 2008 sketch on Saturday Night Live described the Sandlers as “people who should be shot."

The controversial sketch is available here.

This is not news to anyone who has been keeping up with the current financial meltdown, but to the average American and for the ACORN members who are being trained to go out and forcibly stop foreclosures, it is glaring news. While Obama is touting a $65 a month increase for America's workers, ACORN is priming the pump for federal “black gold.” ACORN appears to be challenging Obama for their piece of the pie, either through the stimulus or the foreclosure package. Either way it is now up to the Administration to stand up to a bunch of thugs who are currently under criminal investigation in almost 15 states.

The next installment will review the ever complicated relationship between the Sandlers, ACORN, the Democracy Alliance and the Center for Responsible lending. Stay tuned.

 

 

 

5
Your rating: None Average: 5 (2 votes)

Comments

What the FUCK?

please edit your worthless piece of shit diary.

There is no such thing as a "Pittsburgh Tribune" -- you're perhaps thinking of the adulterer's hemorrhage Pittsburgh Tribune-Review.

 

WELCOME HOME BEAUREGARD!

Are you advocating violence against the Sandlers?

Are you actually advocating that the Sandlers be shot? If so, then you are probably committing another crime - worse than your previous crime of theft from your employer.

Moncrief acknowledged she was fired in January from Project Vote for running up more than $3,000 in personal expenses on a credit card. She said she has paid half the money back, and "I am really sorry."

If you are not advoacting that the Sandlers be shot - it you are instead saying that a skit on SNL that says the Sandlers should be shot proves the points you are trying to make - then you are even more clueless than I thought.

 

I can see that my good

I can see that my good friends are at it again. Welcome loyal readers.

NextRightNando breathe, stop worrying about the Feds seizing your computer and read again. I  am merely stating facts. The SNL skit was just a skit, however, it is interesting to see your reaction to it. The Sandlers were exoposed for all of  America to see. I am merely highlighting this fact.

Rising Tide, missed your witty comments, keep reading and posting. You are priceless.

An Acorn Whistleblower

An Acorn Whistleblower Testifies in CourtThe group's ties to Obama are extensive.

  http://online.wsj.com/article/SB122533169940482893.html#printMode

 By JOHN FUND

Acorn, the liberal "community organizing" group that claims it will deploy 15,000 get-out-the-vote workers on Election Day, can't stay out of the news.

The FBI is investigating its voter registration efforts in several states, amid allegations that almost a third of the 1.3 million cards it turned in are invalid. And yesterday, a former employee of Acorn testified in a Pennsylvania state court that the group's quality-control efforts were "minimal or nonexistent" and largely window dressing. Anita MonCrief also says that Acorn was given lists of potential donors by several Democratic presidential campaigns, including that of Barack Obama, to troll for contributions.

The Obama campaign denies it "has any ties" to Acorn, but Mr. Obama's ties are extensive. In 1992 he headed a registration effort for Project Vote, an Acorn partner at the time. He did so well that he was made a top trainer for Acorn's Chicago conferences. In 1995, he represented Acorn in a key case upholding the constitutionality of the new Motor Voter Act -- the first law passed by the Clinton administration -- which created the mandated, nationwide postcard voter registration system that Acorn workers are using to flood election offices with bogus registrations.

Ms. MonCrief testified that in November 2007 Project Vote development director Karyn Gillette told her she had direct contact with the Obama campaign and had obtained their donor lists. Ms. MonCrief also testified she was given a spreadsheet to use in cultivating Obama donors who had maxed out on donations to the candidate, but who could contribute to voter registration efforts. Project Vote calls the allegation "absolutely false."

She says that when she had trouble with what appeared to be duplicate names on the list, Ms. Gillette told her she would talk with the Obama campaign and get a better version. Ms. MonCrief has given me copies of the donor lists she says were obtained from other Democratic campaigns, as well as the 2004 DNC donor lists.

In her testimony, Ms. MonCrief says she was upset by Acorn's "Muscle for Money" program, which she said intimidated businesses Acorn opposed into paying "protection" money in the form of grants. Acorn's Brian Kettering says the group only wants to change corporate behavior: "Acorn is proud of its corporate campaigns to stop abuses of working families."

Ms. MonCrief, 29, never expected to testify in a case brought by the state's Republican Party seeking the local Acorn affiliate's voter registration lists. An idealistic graduate of the University of Alabama, she joined Project Vote in 2005 because she thought it was empowering poor people. A strategic consultant for Acorn and a development associate with its Project Vote voter registration affiliate, Ms. MonCrief sat in on policy-making meetings with the national staff. She was fired early this year over personal expenses she had put on the group's credit card.

She says she became disillusioned because she saw that Acorn was run as the personal fiefdom of Wade Rathke, who founded the group in 1970 and ran it until he stepped down to take over its international operations this summer. Mr. Rathke's departure as head of Acorn came after revelations he'd employed his brother Dale for a decade while keeping from almost all of Acorn's board members the fact that Dale had embezzled over $1 million from the group a decade ago. (The embezzlement was confirmed to me by an Acorn official.)

"Anyone who questioned what was going on was viewed as the enemy," Ms. MonCrief told me. "Just like the mob, no one leaves Acorn happily." She believes the organization does some good but hopes its current leadership is replaced. She may not be alone.

Last August two of Acorn's eight dissident board members, Marcel Reed and Karen Inman, filed suit demanding access to financial records of Citizens Consulting Inc., the umbrella group through which most of Acorn's money flows. Ms. Inman told a news conference this month Mr. Rathke still exercises power over CCI and Acorn against the board's wishes. Bertha Lewis, the interim head of Acorn, told me Mr. Rathke has no ties to Acorn and that the dissident board members were "obsessed" and "confused."

According to public records, the IRS filed three tax liens totaling almost $1 million against Acorn this spring. Also this spring, CCI was paid $832,000 by the Obama campaign for get-out-the-vote efforts in key primary states. In filings with the Federal Election Commission, the Obama campaign listed the payments as "staging, sound, lighting," only correcting the filings after the Pittsburgh Tribune-Review revealed their true nature.

"Acorn needs a full forensic audit," Ms. MonCrief says, though she doesn't think that's likely. "Everyone wants to paper things over until later," she says. "But it may be too late to reform Acorn then." She strongly supports Barack Obama and hopes his allies can be helpful in cleaning up the group "after the heat of the election is gone."

Acorn's Mr. Kettering says the GOP lawsuit "is designed to suppress legitimate voters," and he says Ms. MonCrief isn't credible, given that she was fired for cause. Ms. MonCrief admits that she left after she began paying back some $3,000 in personal expenses she charged on an Acorn credit card. "I was very sorry, and I was paying it back," she says, but "suddenly Acorn decided that . . . I had to go. Since then I have gotten warnings to 'back off' from people at Acorn."

Acorn insists it operates with strict quality controls, turning in, as required by law, all registration forms "even if the name on them was Donald Duck," as Wade Rathke told me two years ago. Acorn whistleblowers tell a different story.

"There's no quality control on purpose, no checks and balances," says Nate Toler, who worked until 2006 as the head organizer of an Acorn campaign against Wal-Mart in California. And Ms. MonCrief says it is longstanding practice to blame bogus registrations on lower-level employees who then often face criminal charges, a practice she says Acorn internally calls "throwing folks under the bus."

Gregory Hall, a former Acorn employee, says he was told on his very first day in 2006 to engage in deceptive fund-raising tactics. Mr. Hall has founded a group called Speaking Truth to Power to push for a full airing of Acorn's problems "so the group can heal itself from within."

To date, Mr. Obama has declined to criticize Acorn, telling reporters this month he is happy with his own get-out-the-vote efforts and that "we don't need Acorn's help." That may be true. But there is no denying his ties with Acorn helped turbocharge his political career.

Mr. Fund is a columnist for WSJ.com.

 

Why do you attack with such venom Rising Tide?

Why do you attack with such venom Rising Tides? I have been reading these post for a while now and I note that you are  far too vicious. It leads me to believe that Anita is telling the truth and are you very frigthened.

I have been followiung these post and others by the  ACORN 8, and they seem to be on the same page which is ACORN uses it's members. 

Not only is the Sandler, ACORN relationship indisputable, it smacks of unsavory if not outright criminal activity.  Anywone, who has  was deployed to intimidate any Sandler competition is a little more than simply ticked if you have not been you should be ticked. 

Speak Sweet Truth

 

 

venom? none here.

I dislike shills, but there's no need to be venomous to them.

*&=4eva