| About Us | Contact | Donate | User Blogs | Login |
Mark Udall's Support of Middle Class Tax Hike: Out of Step with Coloradans
One of the key contrasts in the important Colorado U.S. Senate race is the issue of tax reform. Bob Schaffer has a consistent record as the taxpayer's friend, while Mark Udall has a consistent record as an old school tax-and-spend liberal Democrat.
You can almost hear the groans of protest from some Democrats: Mark Udall? He's just against all those tax cuts for the rich? He wouldn't vote to increase taxes on the middle class, especially not as Colorado families face the crunch of rising energy prices? Right?
Wrong. Fellow Democratic Congressman have called out Mark Udall and the Party's liberal leadership for just that:
Reps. Bill Foster (D-Ill.) and Don Cazayoux (D-La.), who both won election earlier this year in districts held for years by the GOP, explained their votes against the Democratic budget as stands against tax increases on middle-class voters.
“I can’t support a budget, from either party, that raises taxes on the middle class,” Foster said in a statement posted on his website. “I campaigned on a platform of middle-class tax relief, and I was elected to Washington to bring about change. When asked to choose between my party and the people I represent, I will choose the families of the 14th district every single time.”
Cazayoux struck a very similar tone.
“I voted against [the budget] because it allows tax cuts to expire in 2010, raising taxes on most American taxpayers,” he said in a statement given to The Hill. “I promised the people of the 6th district of Louisiana to vote with my party when they are right, and vote against them when they are wrong. My vote today was the right vote for my constituents.”
On a narrowly decided question, Mark Udall's vote in the House of Representatives helped to lay the groundwork for bringing back the marriage penalty and other tax hikes on hard-working, middle-class Colorado families.
Mark Udall is just representing liberal Boulder in Congress. But he is out of step with most of Colorado.
Cross posted at Schaffer v Udall


Comments
Save our Home......
For a while now, many can speculate the trouble started at the tail end of 2006 with the mortgage industry busy, the American economy has been struggling, facing uncertain times. One of the biggest buzzwords over the last six months or so is the term bailout. Bailout payments have been made to a lot of huge companies, and Chairman of the Federal Reserve Ben Bernanke insists that it's the right thing to do, even though it's with taxpayer money. Part of the recovery plan isn't an explanation why the money wasn't just given to the American People, to decide how best to use the payday loans their leaders made out themselves. In the effort to save our homes, many of us have turned to payday loans instead of traditional short term loans from banks that no longer will lend to the people that paid for their bailout to begin with.