McCain's Own Treacherous Buddies

 McCain's own treacherous buddies

<!--StartFragment-->

Bill Press

World Net Daily Commentary

http://www.worldnetdaily.com/index.php?pageId=78218

Posted: October 17, 2008

1:00 am Eastern © 2008 

First, this confession. Many years ago, while teaching high school in San Francisco, I lived in the same precinct as former Black Panther Angela Davis. I may even have said hello once or twice. Yes, I am a terrorist.

But I'm not the only one. As a young man, former North Vietnamese dictator Ho Chi Minh worked as a baker at Boston's famous Parker House Hotel. All those who worked with him in the kitchen? Lock 'em up! Terrorists!

Absurd? Of course! But no more absurd than John McCain's continuing accusations that Barack Obama is a terrorist sympathizer because of his relationship with Bill Ayers. As revealed in this column last week, their relationship is almost nonexistent.

Obama was 8 years old and living in Indonesia with his mother when Ayers helped found the Weatherman organization. By the time Obama met him, in 1995, Ayers was a tenured education professor at the University of Illinois in Chicago, consultant to the mayor on education reform and had been honored as Chicago's "Citizen of the Year." Along with dozens of others, Obama served on two charitable boards with Ayers and attended a political coffee in his home. Obama hasn't seen Ayers, or spoken with him, for three years.

That's it. End of story. But, based on that slim connection, McCain and running mate Sarah Palin accuse Obama of "palling around with terrorists." This is the kind of guilt-by-association politics – "Are you now, or have you ever been?" – we haven't seen since the days of Sen. Joseph McCarthy. And it's especially dangerous for John McCain, who's been "palling around" with some pretty unsavory characters himself – starting with Charles Keating, whose fraudulent business practices triggered the S&L crisis that cost taxpayers $3.4 billion.

McCain accepted over $150,000 in campaign contributions from Keating and associates. He and his family also often vacationed at Keating's Bahamas retreat and flew on his private jet. Cindy McCain invested in a Keating real estate project. They were business partners and personal buddies.

Then there's G. Gordon Liddy, who spent four years in federal prison for his role in the 1972 Watergate burglary. Liddy held a fundraiser for McCain in his home. In November 2007, as a candidate for president, McCain told Liddy on his radio show: "I'm proud of you. ... Congratulations on your continued success and adherence to the principles and philosophies that keep our nation great."

What principles was McCain talking about? In his autobiography, Liddy admits plotting with co-conspirator Howard Hunt to kill journalist Jack Anderson. And in 1994, after the government's raid on the Branch Davidian compound in Waco, Texas, Liddy told his listeners: "Now, if the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco and Firearms comes to disarm you and they are bearing arms, resist them with arms. Go for a head shot. ... Kill the sons of bitches." Are those are the principles that "keep our nation great"?

Retired Gen. John Singlaub is another McCain sidekick. In the 1980s, as a member of Congress, McCain sat on the advisory board of Singlaub's organization, the U.S. Council for World Freedom. Long linked to ultra-right-wing death squads in Central America, the council played a major role in the Reagan administration's Iran-Contra scandal, serving as the front group for Ollie North's illegal White House operation of selling arms to Iran in order to arm the contras.

McCain's own rogues gallery also includes Washington attorney William Timmons, whom McCain recently named to head his presidential transition team (as though he'll need one). Not only is Timmons a registered lobbyist – one of many lobbyists McCain has surrounded himself with, despite his daily promise to chase lobbyists out of Washington – he also counts among his previous clients: Saddam Hussein!

For five years, Timmons worked with a team of lobbyists to ease international sanctions against Iraq. Their lobbying activities occurred in the years immediately following the first Gulf War, when the United States had already branded Iraq as a rogue enemy state and a sponsor of terrorism.

In other words, in the warped thinking of the McCain campaign, John McCain hangs out with convicted felons, a would-be murderer, an illegal arms merchant and Saddam Hussein's lobbyist, and he's an American hero. Barack Obama serves on a charitable board with a man who conspired to commit illegal acts 26 years before he met him, yet he's a terrorist.

Go figure. Only Sarah Palin could follow that logic.

<!--EndFragment-->

5
Your rating: None Average: 5 (1 vote)

Comments

McCain's attacks on Ayers are misguided, but...

The problem, at least my problem, with Bill Ayers isn't so much that he's a former terrorist.  The real problem is that he's still a radical Communist who is working to radicalize our schools and Barack Obama has been a strong supporter in this regard.  The "Obama hangs out with an unrepentant terrorist" line is true, but misguided.  The line really should be "Senator Barack Obama has funneled money to radical Communist groups as part of 2 major charities to push their agendas on Chicago schools as a veiled attempt to improve educational achievement."

However, even taking the Ayers attacks at face value, he simply doesn't compare to any of those other guys.

Keating is old news and is would be more likened to Rezco than Ayers.  McCain admitted his mistake 20 years ago and has been overzealous since then in reforming how Washington works.

Liddy is harmless.  He was a burglar for Nixon and thought up a bunch of assassination plots that they never went through with.  Plus he had a fascination with Hitler before people realized Hitler was evil, though he still admires certain things about the Nazi regime.  And he advocated killing federal agents who unlawfully burst into your home waving guns in your face.  Good for him.  There's a special place in hell for Lon Horiuchi.

Iran-Contra...yawn.  Some anti-Communists doing some stuff likely without McCain's knowledge.  Anti-Communist military generals and Oliver North...doesn't sound too radical to me.

Timmons is a little more troubling, but McCain can claim ignorance on that one and simply throw the guy under the bus.  That's what I would do, anyhow.

None of these guys amount to an unrepentant domestic terrorist who is currently radicalizing America's education system with the support of Barack Obama.

And Bill Press is a moron for parroting Democratic talking points as if the McCain campaign is actually suggesting that Obama is a terrorist.  I could tolerate these conservative defectors a lot more if they didn't just repeat lame Kos talking points.

Glib is not an answer

<!--StartFragment-->

You appear to be somewhat glib in your response. Your characterization that Liddy is “harmless” would be laughable if it were not pathetic. The man is a convicted felon – he spent 4 years in jail and was luckily thwarted from carrying out his assassination plots. I do not consider that “harmless”. His admiration for the Nazi regime notwithstanding Liddy was and still is clear and present danger – he advocates violence at least equally to Ayers and has the track record to prove it.

Secondly, you glaringly omitted any attempted justification of General Singlaub’s organization and its links to right-wing death squads. Is that because you favor such organizations and their goals? I certainly hope not, but John McCain’s presence on the board of the U.S. Council for World Freedom is significantly more telling then Obama’s presence on an Annenberg foundation board. I don’t think Mrs. Annenberg countenances death squads for resolving political differences.

Thirdly, the Iran-Contra scandal was an unequivocal breach of US law. President Reagan admittedly violated the law by authorizing the entire program and was lucky that he was able to escape without facing the consequences.

Fourth, the implications of Palin’s statements about “paling around with terrorists (names please)” is clearly an incitement to mob actions. Words have meaning and they have consequences all of which have the possibility of negatively impacting the health of our republic.

Fifth, Keating and his cohort of senators ended up costing this country several billion dollars out of pocket and untold billions resulting in a loss of confidence in the S & L system. Rezco, at worst, does not compare in scale or scope.

Nice try, but I'm not buying any of your arguments.

<!--EndFragment-->

 

Obama doing radical things with radical people

The problem, at least my problem, with Bill Ayers isn't so much that he's a former terrorist.  The real problem is that he's still a radical Communist who is working to radicalize our schools and Barack Obama has been a strong supporter in this regard.

I agree 100% and I made that exact same point to a friend today and he agreed. The real problem is that Obama had done radical things with radical people.  it's not that Ayers is an ex-terrorist, its that Ayers was and continues to be a very radical person, who just last year feted the demagogue Hugo Chavez. Ayers is completely unrepetent about his radicalism. What Obama did with Ayers was spend $100 million to foster a left-liberal 'innovation' in schools, that btw did nothing to help kids learn. When Obama thinks a radical like Ayers is 'normal' it shows how skewed obama's 'center' is .... waaaay out in left field - like his left-liberal voting record.

 

More talking points

You ignored my argument completely.  I already said that I don't agree with the way McCain is bringing up the Ayers issue.  I don't care that Obama is friends with a former terrorist.  I care that Barack Obama was actively promoting Communists in their radicalization of American schools.  Your contention that Obama didn't pal around with terrorists (Ayers and Dohrn) is laughable.  And your claim that the McCain campaign's words are undermining the health of our republic is laughable.  You know what is undermining the health of our republic?  Barack Obama's ties to radicalizing our education system and defrauding the entire democratic process by giving money to left-wing organizations like ACORN to defraud the vote.  The fact that you are simply parroting Kos talking points about how the McCain camp's speech is "dangerous" is ridiculous.  How dangerous were all the Bush = Hitler comparisons perpetuated by Moveon.org/George Soros/Owner of the Democratic Party and at all of the Communist anti-War rallies across America?

Now, again, as far as the individuals go:

G. Gordon Liddy was working for the president.  He spent 4 years in prison and was pardoned by Obama's buddy Jimmy Carter.  He had some crazy ideas that were never carried out.  His statements about killing federal agents are right on.  If they kick in your door, wave a gun in your face, and you've done nothing wrong, kill them.  Don't you know that the Supreme Court says that we can use lethal force in resisting an unlawful arrest?  I don't disagree with Gordon Liddy on this point in the slightest.  You don't seem to understand the difference between bombing the homes of judges and defending yourself against jackbooted thugs who are storming your house.  But again, Obama's education advocacy with Bill Ayers is far more troubling.

Like I said, G. Gordon Liddy is harmless.  He's a 77 year old man who preaches right-wing views on the radio, most of which I would probably agree with.  Ayers is a Communist star in the education community.

You didn't establish any endorsement of these right-wing death squads by McCain or Singlaub.  The WACL was linked to such squads, but according to the Huffington post when Singlaub created the Council of World Freedom he expelled the more radical members.  Not that I care.  If we're going to care about what's legal or not legal then anyone who was ever friends with Charlie Wilson or J. Edgar Hoover could be considered similarly radical.  It's not a big deal to me personally.

So, like I said, I don't agree with the tactic that the McCain campaign is putting out about Obama and Ayers.  But it's the truth.  Obama has several connections to Williams Ayers (worked in the same office, Obama wrote a blurb for Ayers' book, worked on 2 foundations together giving money to radicals, etc.).  If Obama wants to cry about the truth that McCain is putting out about him, then he can go right ahead.

In the meantime, Obama can criticize McCain's radical ties to a retired Major General and a retired FBI agent.  I'll side with anti-Communists over Communists just about any day of the week.  If the Obama campaign wants to take this tactic against him, they can go right ahead.

The DNC has already made ads about McCain and Keating.  I never said Keating and Rezko were the same, but they have more in common with each other than Keating and Ayers do.  And McCain never did Keating any favors, while Obama funneled Rezko all kinds of money.  I could accept a claim that Obama merely showed poor judgment just like McCain did.

Regardless, none of these connections are disturbing to me except the Saddam Hussein lobbyist.

MCain support of terrorists

See my recent post about the Reagan administration support of a communist terror group and McCain's support of same.

However, at the end of the day this is nothing but an intellectual argument. The real truth on the ground, where the votes are cast, is the shade of James Carville in 1991 - "It's the economy stupid".

Finally, voters are voting for their self-interest rather then the ideological/culture war claptrap that has been advanced by republicans for the past several election cycles. This could be the year (finally) where Thomas Franks (What's Wrong With Kansas) is proven wrong. 

Bottom line is a)McCain is from the wrong generation and is a Grumpy Old Politician without a clear and unified message, b)he has more flip-flops then a high diver in the Olympics, c)he made a drastic strategic error in putting the Caribou Barbie on the ticket - while she appeals to the base; she has little appeal to the rest of the electorate who was (along with me) expecting more from the Straight Talk Express (which has turned out to be the Circle Line day liner - just going round and round in circles, usually against the tide).

Best wishes (sincerely).