Blogs

Obama’s Third World America. Equality At Last.

Liberals and Marxists everywhere are quick to point to Fidel Castro’s Cuba as the ideal socialist society. Insipid pandering celebs such as Michael Moore, Sean Penn and Harry Belafonte are all over themselves lauding the place to the skies. Understand…they wouldn’t want to LIVE there. Not as ordinary citizens anyhow, much like our Congress won’t LIVE under the health care that they are proposing for us.

I’m forever astounded at the consistency of liberal thought versus action. It’s always for someone ELSE to do or say, or think or live by. Never themselves. Wherefore the disconnect? I’ll stick with my brain lesion theory.

Not too long ago, we had a massive state of emergency in the Gulag of Cuba when it was announced that there was a critical shortage of toilet paper. See, if they’d just listened to Sheryl Crowe… they don’t grow corn in Cuba so no corn cob… and sugar cane don’t work so well…how about tobacco leaf? Gee, they can always carry a bottle of water and emulate the middle eastern example…wonder how long that would take to catch on with the trendy lefty crowd? Now we have a severe shortage of power and clean water. What a surprise…shortages in this worker’s paradise?

Handsome UGO Chavez has announced severe shortages as well, as has Brazil which just had a power outage affecting 60,000,000 people (that’s sixty MILLION people for you math challenged libs out there), due to nothing more than very poorly maintained power transmission lines.

Our own flu vaccine production has become a rancid joke under “GOVERNMENT” supervision. People all over the country are unable to access a vaccine that we have had ample time and warning to prepare. It’s so embarrassing that the Obama administration has stopped ginning up the pandemic hysteria because of their obvious ineptitude in managing a largely manufactured crises. This is BEFORE ‘healthcare’ is even passed.

By way of example and a harbinger of our own future if we don’t STAND UP and stop these Marxist dilettantes, the socialist health care system in the UK is on the verge of imploding. They can’t pump enough money into it to make it work. It produces nothing but bureaucracy and mismanagement, to say nothing of very poor and inadequate patient care…almost indifferent. I personally know of one lady in Wales who has waited well over a year to see a specialist over a rotator cuff problem. She has told me of a friend of hers who waited EIGHTEEN MONTHS for an eye operation that I obtained here in two weeks.

Insane levels of taxation and regulation are causing a massive exodus of business and manufacturing overseas, while all the DeMarxists and the wannabe Dictatorate in the White House do is grope for more money, while planting ever more burden on the backs of the citizenry. Socialized health care…hell’s bells…SOCIALIZED ANYTHING has failed miserably wherever it has been tried. A quick look at any unrevised history will tell the tale very quickly.

It’s time we told the Obama bunch just exactly that and we will not have any part of it. Elections are coming in 2010 and we need to sweep the boards clean!

Semper Vigilans, Semper Fidelis

© Skip MacLure 2009

 

Latest Dodd poll: Diver still down

The Latest Quinnipiac poll is out, and Dodd is still down.

Former Connecticut Congressman Rob Simmons has an early lead in the Republican primary race for the 2010 U.S. Senate contest and runs better than any other challenger against Sen. Christopher Dodd, topping the Democratic incumbent 49 - 38 percent, according to a Quinnipiac University poll released today.  

He loses as well to Linda McMahon and Tom Foley, and is in a dead heat with Sam Caligiuri and Peter Schiff

Why?  Because CT voters don;t find him trustworthy and don't think he cares about their issues.They also don;t think he's doing a a good job on the economy.

Support for the Democratic health plan, although higher here than most places, is slipping.

The good news for Dodd, if any, is that Simmons does face a primary challenge of significance from the "Wild RINO". But in a matter of weeks she's raised her negative rating almost as fast as her positive rating. Oops!

Chris Christie had a primary too, Didn;t help Corzine. And the pattern of Q polls on Dodd is looking more and more like the pattern of polls on Corzine before his failed re-election bid.

 

 

Economic freedom and individual freedom are mutual co-dependents.

You cannot have one without the other. Why, then, do those who seem to earnestly champion economic liberty seem so at home with cultural repression?

Free markets require free men. If I am a slave to the prevailing cultural mores, then I am not likely to have a great deal of freedom on the market.

An Army of None: Why General Casey Needs to Go

Political correctness leaves the US Army leaderless

This week, during an interview by David Gregory, General Casey, Chief of Staff of the US Army, said the following:

"Yeah. I think those concerns are real and I, and I will tell you, David, that they're, they're fueled partially, at least, by the speculation about--based on anecdotal evidence that people are presenting. I think we have to be very careful with that. Our diversity not only in our Army, but in our country, is a strength. And as horrific as this tragedy was, if our diversity becomes a casualty, I think that's worse."

As soon as one realizes what the general has said in this mind-numbingly idiotic statement, one becomes aware of the trouble we're really facing as a nation.

Damage to 'diversity" is a greater loss than the security of our troops, the 13 people we've lost, and the dozens more who have been injured or maimed? Any general who believes this garbage does not deserve the rank. We have been attacked by a politically/religiously motivated Islamofascist, and all this numbskull general is worried about is the damage done to diversity?

Ahem, Hey General: SCREW DIVERSITY.

Diversity is irrelevant to a fighting force, and in fact can actually hamper or obstruct it.  Focusing on diversity, as a military objective, is the most ludicrous notion we've yet seen. You would be fired, but for the fact that our current President, your boss, doubtless laps up this bilge-water.

I live in central Texas, and this was quite the ordeal for our community, one that hasn't ended yet, in fact, and all you are worried about is diversity, General Casey? Hand in your stars. You are an embarrassment to every soldier who ever wore the uniform of the United States, myself included.

Markamerica

Chris Murphy: Haughty Hose Fan dissing majority of constituents in Bush League move

World Series Yankees    Murphy1Yankees - Logo Poster at ...

One would think it would be impossible to screw up voting on a nonbinding resolution congratulating a sports team, but Mr. Arrogance, Congressman Chris Murphy, succeeded in the politically impossible.

He insulted his constituents across a majority of his district. 

U.S. Rep. Christopher Murphy voted against a resolution in the U.S. House of Representatives that congratulated the New York Yankees on recently winning the World Series

Now why would a politician do this? OK, there were a few members from Massachusetts, metro Philadelphia, and one sore Anaheim Angel fan out there who voted no. But a Connecticut congressman? 

The 5th District is located primarily in Fairfield and New Haven counties.  As the Quinnipiac poll demonstrates, not only are the Yankees the most popular baseball team in CT, they are especially popular in that part of the state.

In fact, the largest city completely within the 5th District is only 56 miles from Yankee Stadium

I haven't seen any polling on this point, but I strongly suspect Derek Jeter is hell of a lot more popular than some Nancy Pelosi lapdog in Congress

derek-jeter

So back to the point, why Chris?, Why anger your constituents who are celebrating a well earned victory?

As a lifelong diehard Sox fan, I have too many scars from Bucky Dent to Aaron Boone to add another from casting a vote to congratulate the Yankees for winning this year’s World Series," Murphy said. 

Sounds like a whole lot of sour grapes and arrogance, Mr. Murphy.  You would think a liberal Democrat would appreciate a team that wins even after paying a "luxury tax". Oh boo hoo, Chris.

That's Ok Chris, we'll let all your constituents in southwestern Connecticut know you are a petty little man who saw fit to insult a team they've rooted for all their lives.  Perhaps your career will then emulate that of this brilliant Red Sox legend

buckner_bill_1986.jpg

 

Why Is The Right Being Ignored? Why Does It Keep Losing Elections?

Why are the Democrats pushing ahead with their progressive agenda without fear of reprisal in the 2010 elections? Why have Republicans lost pretty much everything since 2006?   Simple answer: there are not as many of you on the right as you think there are.   Rasmussen, Rush Limbaugh, and Fox News are all lying to you about the strength of your own numbers.   Here is an excellent example - Jon Stewart exposing Hannity's blatant lies about the number of people who attended Michele Bachmann's tea party.

The Daily Show With Jon Stewart Mon - Thurs 11p / 10c
Sean Hannity Uses Glenn Beck's Protest Footage
www.thedailyshow.com
Daily Show Full Episodes Political Humor Health Care Crisis

 

 

Step one in the revival of the right - stop believing your own propaganda. 

Political Correctness…Terrorism’s Happy Place.

It’s a sad, very frightening scenario. Something that has late heroes like George S. Patton and Lewis B. ‘Chesty’ Puller, leaders who were warriors, rotating at 78 rpm in their graves.

We have a Four Star General of the United States Army more concerned about ‘diversity’ and political correctness, than in the execution of the world war on terror and combating possible infiltration of our fighting forces by individuals, who may or may not have an affinity for the pernicious evils of militant Islam. It ain’t your daddy’s Army anymore.

They are making special exemptions to allow people into the military who wouldn’t clear receiving barracks ten years ago. We don’t have a  military COMBAT frame of mind in the high command of the armed forces, we have SOCIAL EXPERIMENTATION on a grand scale. Political correctness of the sort that allowed a Major Malik Nidal Hasan to not only slip through the cracks, but  simply ignore glaring warnings. Not just a few, there were many. Where were the people who should have taken note and taken action?

We have PC spin apologists calling it everything but what it was. Stress syndrome! What stress? The guy was an officer in a cush job that was essentially a sinecure when compared to most Army officer assignments. It was a plain murder by a homicidal jihadist who planned exactly what he was going to do. Just because he was not directly linked to one of the known Al Qaeda  terror groups makes him no less one of them. His cry of Allahu Akbar as he started his murderous rampage pretty much nails that one down.

The question begs…HOW THE HELL DID THIS GUY PASS BACKGROUND CHECKS? Unless it was because he WAS Muslim and the pressure on Army personnel to treat these people differently. This is the price of POLITICAL CORRECTNESS in the military, or anywhere in our society for that matter. A practical mind would call it just plain damn stupidity.

I’ve seen some media types wringing their hands and bemoaning that Major Hasan was supposedly ‘harassed’ by fellow soldiers…the kind of  statement that could only have been made by someone who had never been closer to the military than a television. Harassed!? Harassed by whom? The man was an officer. Certainly, no enlisted man would have said anything to him, either directly or in front of another officer. They would have instantly risked being brought up on charges. If someone had something to say about him, it would have been in private and around men of comparable rank. Even saying something in front of a senior non-com would have been to risk a dressing down. Another officer? Maybe one with a half a snoot full at the Officers Club? But such things are ungentlemanly and are generally frowned upon. Maybe another officer in private, calling him on his dangerously un-American views? Perhaps, but it would have to be one of equal or higher rank. Seems that there are a lot of people, in and out of the military, trying to make excuses for Major Hasan’s actions. There’s a glaring question mark behind that one also.

What about the rest of the Muslims in our military? We have had a Sergeant roll a grenade into a room, killing two officers and wounding fourteen others in Kuwait. He was a Muslim convert. There have been other domestic terror plots against our military, it is to be noted however, not connected to any service personnel.What about the soldiers who have to serve with the Muslim troops? How often do they ask themselves, “Is this dude going to go off one of these days?” AND what is the Army doing about that?

Has anyone gotten around to asking General Casey, while he’s busy protecting the Muslim troops in the Army from any ‘backlash’, what he is doing to protect the rest of the troops from them? Fair or not, they are part of a group of people known to espouse and nurture a virulently violent philosophy that worships death. It seems a little insane not to scrutinize them as well. Political correctness be damned.It appears that it is the only way to ensure we don’t have any more Malik Nidal Hasans.

Semper Vigilans, Semper Fidelis

© Skip MacLure 2009

 

Obama Health Care five Years in Jail

The House of Representatives passed their Obama Health Care bill H.R. 3962 saturday night on November 7th, 2009. In it is a provision to jail anyone who does not get “acceptable health insurance coverage”. The penalty is that you are "subject to numerous civil and criminal penalties, including criminal fines of up to $250,000 and imprisonment of up to five years."

Criminal penalties

Prosecution is authorized under the Code for a variety of offenses. Depending on the level of the noncompliance, the following penalties could apply to an individual:

• Section 7203 – misdemeanor willful failure to pay is punishable by a fine of up to $25,000 and/or imprisonment of up to one year.

• Section 7201 – felony willful evasion is punishable by a fine of up to $250,000 and/or imprisonment of up to five years.” [page 3]

http://republicans.waysandmeans.house.gov/News/DocumentSingle.aspx?DocumentID=153583 

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vHybRZ691_g

 

Gitmo Hero

Gitmo Hero

by Lance Thompson

 The American naval base at Guantanamo Bay has received plenty of attention in recent years, ever since we started hosting terrorists in pleasant Carribean detention there.  Liberals and wobbly conservatives have called for shutting down the terrorist-holding facilities there for some sort of vague public relations purpose.  I’m all for relieving the United States Navy of the responsibility of running a tropical retreat for our enemies, as long as they can be moved to some place more fitting–like Devil’s Island.  Whenever I hear about Guantanamo, I always wonder how the US Navy ended up with such a perfect natural harbor on one end of the most brutal, oppressive and dangerous communist island in the world.  Moreover, how does the United States maintain its position there while the Castro family has spent half a century trying to devise ways to get rid of us?  To satisfy my curiosity, I did some research.  Like so many other world-changing aspects of history, the security of our base at Guantanamo can be traced  to one man–determined, aggressive, and fearless.    United States Marines planted the first American flag at Guantanamo Bay during the Spanish-American War in 1898, in which Cuba gained independence from Spain.  The new Cuban government, in 1903, signed a treaty that leased Guantanamo Bay to the United States to use as a coaling station for American naval forces.  The United States was to have complete jurisdiction and control over Guantanamo Bay in perpetuity.  Only by abandoning the base could the United States abrogate the treaty.     For many years, the landlord-tenant relationship was mutually beneficial.  In exchange for an excellent harbor on the west coast of Cuba, the United States pumped money into the Cuban economy, paying rent; buying food, water, building supplies and other goods from Cuba; and employing thousands of Cubans in the base civilian work force.  In 1959, the situation changed radically.  Fidel Castro, briefly imprisoned for a previous attempt at insurrection, finally succeeded in overthrowing the government of dictator Fulgencio Batista, and instituted a communist system increasingly dependent on Soviet aid.  Castro nationalized hundreds of millions of dollars worth of American private property on the island, and the United States responded with a trade embargo.  The Eisenhower and subsequent Kennedy administrations both wanted Castro out.  In April, 1961, an American-sponsored invasion by Cuban exiles at the Bay of Pigs failed when President Kennedy refused to authorize American air support.  In October, 1962, an American U-2 reconnaissance plane detected Soviet missile launchers being erected in Cuba.  A tense diplomatic showdown ensued, escalating to an American blockade against Soviet ships, and the world stood at the brink of war between nuclear superpowers.  Ultimately, the Soviets agreed to dismantle their launchers, take back their missiles, and uneasy peace was restored.  Yet Castro, recently exposed as an enthusiastic and bellicose Soviet client, still had a large American naval base on the western end of his island nation, reminding him that he was not master of his domain.  He was determined to rid himself of the American military presence.    Into this highly-charged atmosphere came the new Guantanamo Bay base commander, newly-minted rear admiral John D. Bulkeley.  It was December, 1963, two weeks after the assassination of President Kennedy showed the world that its fate is never certain.  Admiral Bulkeley commanded a garrison of 5,000 marines, sailors and Seabees and a squadron of Crusader jets with which to defend his 45 square miles of Cuban real estate from Castro’s 250,000-man military equipped with modern Soviet weapons, tanks, and MiG fighters.  Of course, Guantanamo was backed up by military forces on the American mainland, but Bulkeley’s position was hardly favorable.   Bulkeley was not intimidated.  During World War II her served in the Pacific, Atlantic and Mediterranean.  Among other achievements, Bulkeley engaged and sunk Japanese and German warships, conducted secret missions on the coast of Fortress Europe, and was the PT boat skipper who delivered General Douglas MacArthur from Corregidor, through a cordon of Japanese ships and planes, to safety on Mindanao.  By the end of the war, Bulkeley had been awarded a Silver Star, three Distinguished Service Medals, two Distinguished Service Crosses, the Navy Cross and the Medal of Honor.  He was not the type to back down from a fight.  Castro tested Bulkeley in the first few days.  Cuban engineers bulldozed 1100 feet of chain link fence on the perimeter, and Castro’s minister of state security sent Bulkeley a threatening message advising the Americans it would be “imprudent” to repair the fence.  The reason for this incursion was that failing to repair the fence was considered “abandonment” by the treaty, and Castro could lay claim to Guantanamo if the Americans abandoned the base.  If Bulkeley heeded the Cuban warning and did nothing, the United States could lose legal claim to the base.  If he defied the Cubans, he could incite a shooting war with a Soviet ally.    Bulkeley ordered the fence repaired the next morning.  The admiral, dressed in fatigues, stood shoulder to shoulder with two thousand well-armed marines at the break in the fence.  His Crusaders were overhead, and four destroyers were in the bay, armed and ready for any Cuban reaction.  There was none, and navy Seabees had the fence repaired before dark.  Bulkeley had stood tall and Castro had backed down.  The Cuban government repeatedly incited the population with fabrications about American atrocities, incursions, and provocations–none of which were true, and none of which caused a popular uprising against the Americans.  So in February, 1964, Castro seized control of the pumping station for Guantanamo’s fresh water supply (which was outside the Guantanamo perimeter) and shut off the tap.  The Americans had been paying the Cuban government for the water since 1939, and Castro had kept the pipeline open even through the Bay of Pigs and the missile crisis to get the $14,00 monthly payment.  But now Castro intended to drive the Americans out by drought.  Bulkeley instituted severe water restrictions for the ten thousand Americans (military personnel, their families, and civilian workers) on base, cutting the two million gallons used per day in half.  Water tankers and barges shuttling back and forth from the United States and Jamaica brought millions of gallons per visit, and a desalination unit on one vessel supplied further water, but the base was far from self-sufficient.  The crisis made American headlines, and during this presidential election year, there was plenty of bipartisan support for the base commander.  President Johnson authorized immediate construction of a permanent desalination plant at Guantanamo.  With Bulkeley and Guantanamo holding out even without Cuban fresh water, Castro was on the verge of a public relations embarrassment–the Americans didn’t need his water.  So he fabricated another scandal–he accused the Americans of stealing Cuban water through the old pipeline.  Immediately, inquiries from the international press and the American State Department flooded Bulkeley’s office–“Are you stealing Cuban water?”  What neither Castro nor the gullible press knew was that Bulkeley had sealed off the old pipeline as a precaution against Castro restoring the flow with tainted or poisoned water.  Bulkeley sensed a public relations victory of his own.  He invited members of the press to Guantanamo, and had his engineers cut open the pipeline at the perimeter.  It was bone dry, as it had been for at least a week.  Castro was publicly caught in a lie, Bulkeley had again outsmarted him, and the world press was there to witness it.  Guantanamo’s desalination plant was completed by July, ensuring water self-sufficiency in perpetuity.  Castro was furious–Bulkeley outmaneuvered him at every turn.  When Cuban soldiers set up searchlights across the fence from a marine strong point, shining the intense beams into the eyes of the sentries to blind them, Bulkeley had a giant Marine Corps emblem placed on the front of the strong point.  When the Cubans realized they were just lighting up the emblem of their enemies, they removed the searchlights.     Castro’s schemes continued, but Bulkeley frustrated them all.  The Cubans even shot one of their own deceased soldiers and blamed the death on trigger-happy marines, but Bulkeley had clear evidence that the shot did not come from an American weapon.  Castro’s frustration finally led him to put a $50,000 bounty on Bulkeley, dead or alive.  It was never collected.  At any one of the crisis points in the first years of Castro’s reign, a less resolute officer might have buckled under the pressure.  John D. Bulkeley was not prone to buckling.  He steadfastly defended American interests with demonstrations (but never use of) of force, by ingenuity, and by exposing communist lies and propaganda.    Bulkeley had one advantage over contemporary officers.  He enjoyed the full support of the American press, public and president.  In the mid-sixties, American military victories, whether moral or martial, were celebrated by our nation.  Presidents still honored officers who performed well under pressure, rather than second-guessing them.  Citizens still cheered heroes, rather than questioning their motives.  The press still trumpeted our triumphs, rather than questioning our principles.  Admiral John D. Bulkeley made it clear that America would never willingly give up Guantanamo Bay, and would fight to keep it.  The legacy of his courage ensured our possession of Guantanamo Bay today.  According to the treaty, only abandonment will return this important American base to the communists.  If he were still around, Admiral Bulkeley would be astonished at how many Americans want to do just that. --- For the full story on Admiral Bulkeley and his lifelong service to this nation, see “Sea Wolf, the Daring Exploits of a Navy Legend,” by William A. Breuer, Presidio Press, Novato, California, 1989

 

Syndicate content