Keith_Indy's blog

McCain: Integrity and Character

This goes above and beyond as far as I'm concerned.  And I was suprised that CNN was running the lead on it.

http://www.cnn.com/2008/POLITICS/07/01/mccain.ads/index.html

John McCain's campaign will stop advertising on several Web sites that have vilified Barack Obama as unpatriotic and, in one case, compared the Democratic nominee-in-waiting to Adolf Hitler. <!--startclickprintexclude--> <!-- PURGE: /2008/POLITICS/07/01/mccain.ads/art.mccain.2.afp.gi.jpg --><!-- KEEP -->

<!-- /PURGE: /2008/POLITICS/07/01/mccain.ads/art.mccain.2.afp.gi.jpg --> <!--endclickprintexclude-->

A spokesman for McCain said Monday the campaign was not aware its ads were running on the pro-Hillary Clinton sites. He said the campaign has taken steps to block those sites from its online advertising network.

"When we find stuff like this, we take care of it," said McCain spokesman Brian Rogers.

McCain has made it known he is reaching out to former Clinton supporters, and there are nearly two hundred well-trafficked blogs and online communities run by former Clinton supporters who refuse to support Obama. But the three sites on which McCain's ads appeared are particularly hostile to the Illinois senator.

 

Is McCain a Lefty on Energy Policy?

Dale over at QandO has a post up implying McCain is a Lefty for wanting to look into the oil futures trading.  I could see how, if you only looked at the snippet of speech that Reason's Hit & Run posted, you might get that impression.

But if you look at the full speech in context you'll find this interesting bit that was cut out, by way of explanation.

There is the further problem of speculation on the oil futures market, which in many cases has nothing to do with the actual sale, purchase, or delivery of oil. When crude oil became a futures-traded commodity in the 1980’s, the idea was to afford a measure of protection against the historic volatility of oil pricing. It takes several weeks to ship oil from the Arabian Peninsula to the offshore port of Louisiana. And for the buyers, it helps to know that the price will not suddenly fall while the oil is in transit. A futures contract assures importers that they can sell the oil at a profit.

That’s the theory, anyway. But we all know that some people on Wall Street are not above gaming the system.

If the speculation game is a creation of Congress, then why shouldn’t Congress ensure that there’s no "gaming" going on that is artificially raising prices. I don’t know enough about that whole side of the equation to really comment beyond that.

And then there’s the REST OF THE STORY...

It takes a very short leap in logic to wonder why we produce less and less crude oil, while we use more and more of it, or why politicians talk so much about promoting alternative energy sources, but often do so little to promote these alternatives. A reasonable observer, presented only with these numbers of consumption and production, might draw the conclusion that America has accepted this fate because we have no choice in the matter, or because we have no resources of our own. But just the opposite is true: We do have resources, and we do have a choice.

In oil, gas, and coal deposits, we have enormous energy reserves of our own. And we are gaining the means to use these resources in cleaner, more responsible ways. As for offshore drilling, it’s safe enough these days that not even Hurricanes Katrina and Rita could cause significant spillage from the battered rigs off the coasts of New Orleans and Houston. Yet for reasons that become less convincing with every rise in the price of foreign oil, the federal government discourages offshore production.

At the very least, one might assume, America had surely been building new refineries to achieve a more efficient delivery of gasoline to market, and thereby to lower the prices paid by the American people — especially in the summer season. But the policymakers in Washington haven’t got around to that, either. There’s so much regulation of the industry that the last American refinery was built when Jerry Ford was president.

...

We have proven oil reserves of at least 21 billion barrels in the United States. But a broad federal moratorium stands in the way of energy exploration and production. And I believe it is time for the federal government to lift these restrictions and to put our own reserves to use.

We can do this in ways that are consistent with sensible standards of environmental protection. And in states that choose to permit exploration, there must be an appropriate sharing of benefits between federal and state governments. But as a matter of fairness to the American people, and a matter of duty for our government, we must deal with the here and now, and assure affordable fuel for America by increasing domestic production.

In other words,

Drill Here! Drill Now! Pay Less!

  John McCain supports the goals of increased domestic production and refining.

 

Survey Says - 46% Of Americans Use Internet For Politics

Some interesting data people might be interested in...

"Some 47 percent of online adults have watched at least one type of online political video (out of a list of five possible types of videos,)" write the Pew researchers. That amounts to 35 percent of all adults.

Overall, the surveyors found that just under a third of all internet users have participated in the online political process through a variety of means: They either forwarded or wrote their own political commentary, signed online petitions, signed up with the campaigns themselves to receive information, forwarded online audio or video segments, or signed up to volunteer for events related to campaigns.

Fewer than one percent of those surveyed had created their own political video or audio recordings, the survey found.

In many ways, the survey's numbers simply confirm anecdotal evidence of the nature of the online campaign so far.

For example, the authors of the survey write: "Simply put, Democrats and Obama backers are more in evidence on the internet than backers of other candidates or parties."

Then they add: "Among Democrats, Obama's supporters are more likely than Hillary Clinton's supporters to be internet users -- 82 % vs. 71%."

Unsurprisingly, the survey found that almost two thirds of Obama supporters get their political news and information on the internet, versus 56% of McCain supporters.

 

Broadcasters Freedom Act - A Call To Action

[Promoted - There's really no chance that Democrats can bring back the Fairness Doctrine itself...and they know this.  As a result, they're trying to impose it by appealing to populist, anti-business and anti-property sympathies.  You can read more about their current efforts in this article at National Review.

The progressive's "media reform" movement is becoming incredibly well-organized and influential, and it's getting positioned to have a major, game-changing impact on the media landscape.  Their 'fairness doctrine through other means' strategy could tilt the political landscape for generations to come.  This is important. - Jon Henke]

Why are the Democrats against free speech? Why do they want to bring back the Fairness Doctrine? Why are the stalling on an up or down vote on the Broadcaster Freedom Act? And the big question, why aren’t conservatives, republicans, and libertarians up in arms over this and pressuring Congress to act.

Syndicate content