whiteking910's blog

VP Rundown

I've heard an argument that McCain needs to think outside the box.  Make an out-of-left field choice.  I strongly disagree with this way of thinking.  I fail to see how bringing in a novice for the second-highest office in the land would help anyone.

McCain needs a guy who is known.  I've supported Joe Lieberman for the spot but am starting to realize that McCain needs someone with name recognition who will mollify conservatives without alienating the independents and centrist.  Let's go through some names.

Mitt Romney:  A month ago, I would have Romney pegged as a front-runner.  But with Ted Kennedy likely to become worm food in the not-too-distant future, you know Mitt's gonna be angling for a shot at the Senate.

Condi Rice:  No, no, no!  The woman has proven herself to be an even bigger RINO than McCain.  You want to draw conservatives, not anger them further.  Plus, putting a black woman in the spot would be seen as pandering at its worst.

Joe Lieberman:  I've supported Joe based on his strong national security record and the fact that it would be extremely fun watching the Kos crowd howl with rage at the sight.  But, the best running mate is one who complements, not mirrors.

Duncan Hunter:  The darling of right-wing bloggers.  While it would go a long way towards helping McCain regain the favor of the LGF crowd, his poor showing indicates that he lacks mainstream appeal.  And his strong-anti-illegal immigration stance could hurt McCains chances with Latinos, something McCain is trying to avoid.

Rudy Giuliani:  No.  Aside from the fact that his f****d-up personal life would become media fodder, his conservative credentials are highly questionable and it is very difficult to see how he would help McCain.

Charlie Crist:  I don't think so.  Crist brings nothing to the table.  I know he's a front-runner, but he just got elected a couple of years ago.  It's too soon for him.  The only upside is that he is very popular among Florida's blacks and could help offset Obama's popularity, but I'm fishing at best.

Bobby Jindal:  Another top contender.  Like Crist, it's too soon.  I know Johnny's eager to offset the whole age thing, but placing a kitten in the wings to maybe take the place of a lion one day is a disaster waiting to happen.  Add in the fact that Jindal's effectiveness as governor has been questionable and it's a no-go.

Ann Coulter:  Yeah, I know the chance of this happening ranks right up there with the chances of George W. Bush winning the Nobel Peace Price, but it'd make for entertaining TV, wouldn't it.

I'm sure I'm overlooking a few people, but it's late and I'm tired.  Input, as always, is appreciated.

Obama's Problem

in

I've been hearing a lot lately about how Obama is so great, how he is winning all these states.  But what I have noticed is that he's winning states that are either easy victories in the general or will be easy wins for McCain.

Obama's problem is winning the states that do matter.  Because in the states that are expected to become battlegrounds, Hillary has consistently outperformed Obama.  And if Obama can't beat Hillary in those states, how can he be expected to beat McCain? 

But the true problem is perception.  Obama lies on a seemingly hourly basis.  His latest gaffe consisted of claiming his uncle helped liberate Auschwitz.  Unlikely, considering that the Soviets liberated Auschwitz and Barry's mother was an only child.

Obama is supported by scumbags like Castro, Chavez, and Ahmadenjiad.  He has the support of detestable groups like FARC, Code Pink, and Hamas.  He is willing to talk with our enemies without preconditions, which would result in a very weak hand at the negotiation table.  He wants to withdraw from Iraq ASAP, in the face of undeniable military and political progress over there.  Sen. McCain tried to get Barry to join him on a field trip there, which Barry promptly refused.  Bet if it had been a trip to meet with Iran, Barry couldn't have gotten there fast enough.

Obama has a very sorry legislative record on crime, voting against many prominent anti-crime bills in the Illinois legislature and U.S. Senate.  He claims to transcend race but cries racism whenever someone calls him on one of his many gaffes.  He claims to be a uniter, but has the most liberal voting record in the Senate.  Not an easy feat, considering his competition is Harry Reid, Ted Kennedy, and John Kerry.

Obama's problem with perception is that he is perceived as a slick lawyer who got where he is today because of the color of his skin and who looks down on blue-collar citizens.  And that is not going to play well to average America.  Because when the dust clears and the general election campaign starts, I guarantee you Obama is going to get slaughtered.  And his pals in the media will not save him, they may end up hastening his demise.  People still remember when Rather tried to produce those false memos in a blatant effort to slander Bush and influence the election.  Media bias most likely cost Kerry the White House and it can sink Obama.  People want impartial news, not liberal cheerleaders.  Obama is going to get taken to task for his nutjob pastor, his support from thugs and dictators, his loudmouth wife, and too many other issues to list and the more the media tries to suppress these issues, the more credence these issues gain.

In comparison, McCain doesn't have much.  It is a mark of his integrity that liberal tale-tellers like the New York Times and MSNBC haven't been able to come up with much except make fun of his age and try to manufacture a pastor scandal of their own.  Obama has never had to fight for anything.  The only reason he sits in the Senate currently is because the press assassinated his initial opponent.  He's had everything handed to him.  The few struggles that Obama has had were barely skirmishes.  The old master, John McCain, is going to show him a war.

Let it be known that I am a long-time conservative who dislikes John McCain.  That said, at least he takes the security of our nation seriously.  As opposed to Obama, who would just rather talk to them while they build nukes and laugh at our weakness.  I respect McCain's courage and integrity and I honestly believe he'll do his utmost to protect this country.  I LOATHE Obama.  Obama, to my mind, always stood out as the worst in liberalism.  A smooth-talking elitist who got through life on affirmative action and racial preferences.  A man who got through life based on white guilt..  A man who wants to gut our military and appease our enemies, regardless of the consequences.  A man who is incapable of taking a stand on anything.  A man who decries racism but just mumbles some half-hearted excuse when someone points out his racist pastor or his virulently anti-Semitic advisors.  A man who says we need to talk with our enemies but has no problems decrying the "evil" of Fox News.  A man who lies so much, he'd probably overload a polygraph. 

I cannot, in good conscience, support such a man.  McCain is not perfect, but he is infinitely better than the alternative.  If you support high taxes at home and weakness abroad, than the black Jimmy Carter is your man.  But for the rest of you, McCain is the only choice.  I often wonder how Carter ever got to be President to begin with.  We should not make the same mistake twice.  We should not put an untruthful, hypocritical, inexperienced, unprepared, poorly advised liberal in the White House.  In 1976, we made that mistake.  Are we going to make that mistake twice?  I don't intend to.  I just hope enough Americans agree with me.

 

Syndicate content