I pointed out earlier this year that a perfect storm was brewing.  

President Obama and the Democratic leaders in Congress hastily drew a bold line in the sand on the role of government and the direction they wanted to take this country.  They shoved a poorly conceived stimulus bill, riddled with pet projects, down the throats of congress.  They moved to raise taxes and continue to promote a much larger hand of government into corporate offices and living rooms of Americans.  With the multi-trillion dollar healthcare bill falling apart, it’s becoming clear that perhaps this is not the kind of change the American people anticipated.

We are approaching an environment that is ripening for Republican candidates across the country.  Candidates running on a strong economic and jobs message, with a clear vision outlining a more accountable government, over a larger more intrusive one, are seeing momentum gather for their campaigns.

I wanted to share with you some key analysis from three different reputable Republican polling companies, who have publicly released findings, which coincide with this assessment.

See below:

Latest bi-partisan George Washington University national Battleground Poll, conducted by The Tarrance Group in conjunction with Lake Research (a Democratic polling firm).

Highlights:

  • President Obama's Job Approval is down to just 53%, while 42% disapprove.  The intensity on each side is nearly even, with 40% strongly approving, and 37% strongly disapproving.  He is upside down among Independent voters, 42% approve to 50% disapprove.
  • For the first time in several cycles, Republican voters are more energized about voting than Democratic voters.  Fully 75% of Republicans say they are extremely likely to vote in the 2010 elections, compared to just 66% of Democrats.
  • The generic Congressional ballot is back to a only a 3-point Democratic advantage.  By comparison, the generic showed an 8-point DEM lead in the 2006 cycle.
  • Just 34% approve of the job Congress is doing, and Speaker Nancy Pelosi has a 32% favorable image, with fully 51% unfavorable. 
  • Republicans have regained their advantage on the issues of holding down taxes and controlling wasteful spending.  However, on the issue who would better handle turning the economy around, Democrats in Congress still lead by 14-points.  
  • Only 33% say that the economic stimulus passed by Congress is working, while 61% disagree.  But 58% say they agree that it should be given a year to really make a difference.  

For more information: see Ed Goeas' presentation at http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7A5jni0AgoA

Latest NPR poll done by Public Opinion Strategies and Greenberg Quinlan Rosner Research (a Democratic polling firm).  

Key findings:

  • President Obama's approval rating has dropped below 55%, and as many voters strongly disapprove as strongly approve.
  • The GOP has a one point advantage on the generic ballot - highlighting that voters want balance in Washington.
  • A plurality of voters believe that Obama's economic policies have run up a record federal deficit while failing to end the recession instead of his policies having averted an even worse crisis.
  • Voters say that the Democratic Party is not doing a good job addressing the country's priorities this year.  However, in a sobering finding, they think the GOP is doing an even worse job of addressing the country's priorities.
  • A plurality of voters are strongly opposed to the Obama plan to change health care.  Voters who had been undecided on this issue have moved to the negative perspective.

For more information: http://www.pos.org/latestnumbers/nprjuly2009.pdf

 Another interesting Poll by Wilson Research Strategies for the Kaiser Family Foundation on healthcare, analyzed the language for Republicans to remember when discussing the Democratic plan. 

Highlights

  • Discuss the costs in specific, personal detail.  The quickest way to motivate opposition to nationalized health care is to remind most Americans that their taxes and their premiums will go up. 
  • Focus on the universality of the proposal.  If the benefits are not going to benefit them personally, Americans are less willing to pay for them.
  • Don’t let Democrats pretend that only “the rich” will pay for health care.  The strongest argument proponents of health care overhaul have is that “someone else” will foot the bill for this.  Democrats are obviously aware of this and should not be allowed to get away with it.
  • Most importantly, a personal price tag must be added to every proposal.  Specific numbers build opposition to this proposal.  Americans can’t understand and don’t care about billions and trillions, but they do care about $500 in new taxes for themselves or $100 in additional healthcare premiums.

For more information: see WRS’ full assessment on the issue at http://www.w-r-s.com/nationalassessment/.

Brian Donahue is a strategic media consultant with Jamestown Associates.  He also blogs at http://30or60.com.

0
Your rating: None

Comments

Brian, it will be a huge mistake...

...for Republicans to sit back on their hands and watch these polls creep, ever so slowly back in their direction.  And do nothing.  That's nothing but a crapshoot.  Sadly, that is exactly what they are doing.  A big zero for them in 2010.  And 2010 is crucial -  a very short 15 months away.  Without winning back the House or Senate in 2010, well victory 2012 is going to be so much more difficult.  Probably impossible.

No Brian,  for the GOP to get back into the winning circle they're going to have to do something that they find repugnant!  Yes, they're going to have to re-connect and bond with us hayseed hicks out here in flyover country.  The Conservative Base that they've dis'd, insulted and ignored so much especially since 1/21/05.  And Brian, they haven't a clue as to how to do that.

So go ahead,  Mr. Donahue. Work your self up into an emotional lather with all of your false hope, if you choose.  The sad truth is that the GOP continues to sink in quick sand.  Too proud and arrogant to admit their error & ask the Conservative Base for a hand out.  Darvin Dowdy

Depends on the definition of the Conservative Base...

One reason why I suspect you won't see much panic from the White House over sinking poll numbers is that there are people there who remember the first two years of Ronald Reagan.  When he was sworn in, his poll numbers were in the high 60's, the Dow was around 1,000, and unemployment was at 7.5%.  Within two years the Dow was at 750, unemployment was over 10%, and his approval number was somewhere just south of 40%.  The Democrats were convinced we would be saying "President John Glenn" in January, 1985.  (Remember him?  Right Stuff, Wrong Staff.)

Of course, it didn't quite work out that way.  By 1984 the economy was clearly booming, and as I recall Reagan ended up with 60% of the vote.  So waiting for polls to creep is definitely not a good idea.

But then there's the issue of the defintion of the base.  In 1980, Reagan won 55% of the white vote.  in 2008, McCain won 55% of the white vote.  If you go right down the line, white, black, hispanic, men, women, you'll see that McCain and Reagan (in 1980) had similar numbers.  But the goal posts have moved.  Reagan won.  McCain lost.

Men used to be 52% of the vote.  Now they are down to 47%.  Whites used to be 88% of the vote, now they are 74%.  In fact, in 1980, white men were 46% of the vote, now they are down to 34% of the vote.  So if the traditional Conservative base is viewed as white males, the party isn't exactly serving a growing market.

The growth?  Black Americans have increased their percentage of the vote from 10% to 13%.  That might not seem like much, but in an era where Republicans just don't care to reach out that means the whole block is voting for the Democrats.  That changes a 52% victory into a 49% defeat.  (It should be noted that this is a recent event - in 1960 Richard Nixon got 40% of the black vote).  Similarly, the Hispanic vote has exploded (and will continue to grow, and there isn't a lot of Republican reaching out there, either.  George W. Bush tried, but he was mugged by his own people.  The future portents are even less encouraging.  The under-30 vote was 60%+ for the Democrats last year.  Hispanics will be 20% of the vote in 2020.

Reach for the base?  Maybe.  The name of thie site is "The Next Right", not "The Old Right".  In order to keep up with the future American voter, Republicans will need to redefine just what the base is.

You make some valid points but...

...I think you're leaving out the millions of conservative voters who've become exasperated with the Rino's and have simply dropped out of the process.  Stayed at home on election day or some went so far as to protest vote for another.  "Throw the Bum's Out".  There are more of these voters than GOP strategists want to admit.  No, Obama didn't win on 11/4/08, the GOP simply gave it away by nominating a moderate. 

There are plenty within the so called minority groups that understand one thing.  When the GOP is in power, there are more and better paying jobs available.  2010 and 2012 will be all about these bread/butter issues and whether the GOP has enough smarts and courage to do the right thing - "steer right" as the nation wants them to do.  And stop trying to be centrists. DD

One doesn't have to move to the center.

But you do want to limit what you are trying to push.  The Democrats lived in the wilderness for years because in order to be a Democrat you had to follow this long list of must haves (ban all guns, have the government set all wages as part of "equal pay for comparable work", set the top tax rate at 95%, racial and sexual quotas for everything everywhere, abortion on demand to the ninth month, etc).

Then one day they firmed up on a single phrase "government helping people".  That meant, among other things, that there was no longer a party line on guns, or quotas, or comparable work (when was the last time you heard that phrase from anybody, for that matter).  There are pro-life democrats.  There are democrats with a 100% NRA rating.  They didn't move the party to the center, instead they limited those areas which they felt should be the focus.  Health care reform is obviously one such area.

Similarly, the Republican party should narrowly focus on limited government, free trade, and freedom from governmental restrictions.  That doesn't mean compromising on those areas.  On the contrary, Republicans have been too quick to move away from those areas in years past.  Just as the Democrats decided to heed the call to "stop talking about guns", Republicans need to heed the call to "stop talking about gays" (or any other issue that falls outside the Big Three).

If the party is perceived as anti-Black, anti-gay, anti-hispanic, anti atheist, etc, then there won't be enough of a population left to be pro Republican.

You're right, they don't have to move to the...

...center - because they're already there.  Which is why they lost.  By nominating a centrist/ moderate.  They gave the election to Obama by poking their finger in the eye of the conservative, nationalistic Base.  They dis'd a significant number of them to the point that these voters became exasperated and simply dropped out of the process.  DD 

I have to agree with adude

I have to agree with adude.  As he stated above, if the GOP really wants to recapture the hearts and minds of America, they ahve to watch what it is that they are pushing, otherwise no one will be willing to listen to them.  I personally, have been severely disillusioned with the GOP for some time now, and I would far prefer to vote that way than be forced to either not vote or vote Democrat - although I beleve I will be registering Libertarian before the next election  - and it seems a big part of the Republican agenda is just as favoring of statism as Democrats, but instead of a more socially beneficent agenda, the GOP's vision for America, at least over the last decade thanks to that vicious cabal of Neocons that occupies Washington - thank God we got rid of their avatar who made things infinitely worse than better (I mean Bush) - seems to be that they want Christianity enforced on everyone, despite a clear Constitutional mandate explicitly NOT to do so.  (That would be the Establishment clause, and one of the freedoms we are supposed to enjoy is the freedom from tyranny, be it legal tyranny or religious tyranny, and the Framers, who the religious right love to claim as their own, understood that State and Church are supposed to be kept away from each other.)

Furthermore, the economic agenda of the Republican Party seems to have been one where business interests trump all others, and it doesn't matter what laws are broken - theft, rape, murder, environmental crimes - if it's a large enough corporation to make campaign contribututions, whatever they do is just fine.  I can certainly not advocate for a redistrubtion of wealth, but I certainly can't say that I advocate a party that thinks it's just fine that the average worker to executive pay ration is 3 to 400 to 1, and that's on the lower end.  (It's a tenth of that in other industrialized countries.) 

As to the health care issue, a public health care plan, although a completely understandable impulse, and quite frankly at this point almost seems as though we're backwater not to have one, may not be the answer, and the private sector should be given the space in order to cut costs, and restructure so that said discounts are passed on to consumers.  At a certain point, we must admit that financial interests have been given preference over medical issues, which is not a good idea, period.  And we, as a nation, certainly shouldn't take our cues about what to do about health care from Conservatives for Patients Rights and it's ringleader, Rick Scott.  By the way, he's the guy behind a lot of the town hall protests, and isn't now, nor has he ever been, a doctor.  But he HAS been at the helm of a company that had to pay over a billion dollars in restitution for defrauding Medicare!  (Part of personal responsibility is adhering to Law and Order, and it seems that when it comes to street crime, the GOP is just fine with it when that street is Wall.)

Obama's stimuli are going to be part of the bankrupting of this country, no doubt about it.  But we also cannot afford to keep acting as the world's police force.  In fact, it has only gotten us deeper into trouble.  Vietnam is part of what got us off the gold standard (inflation rose as a result of the war, and in order to combat it, Nixon took us off the GS - SS and Medicare/Medicaid played a part, but not as large) and the BULK, far and away, of our national debt was created through defense spending projects, and the prime mover in the creation of that debt, the biggest repeat offender in the creation of that debt was unfortunately for those that don't like their fantasies getting interrupted by the fact of the historical record, Ronald Reagan.  The GOP needs a new vision, a complete rewrite, and this current crop are NOT going to cut it.

tiffany jewelry

Reagan was president when I turned 18, and I hated the bastard.  Still do.  Vehemently.  Republicans invoke the name of Reagan in order to discredit themselves and make them appear as if they have ulterior motives.  They would be better off to invoke the names of Goldwater or Eisenhower instead of some morally degenerate screwball radical.

No, I think my own politics were more influenced by the culture I grew up in, the desert southwest. discount tiffany jewelry