| About Us | Contact | Donate | User Blogs | Login |
Cheney Throws Bush (and Paulson) Under the Bus on Bailout Nation
In this interview with Larry Kudlow yesterday, Dick Cheney said about TARP:
KUDLOW: But did you anticipate the degree of government control over the banks? No question throwing a safety net from Federal Reserve liquidity was appropriate. I don’t think any economist left or right disagrees with that. On the other hand, what we’ve seen now is that this Congress has moved in to declare, for example, compensation and pay limits, repurchase agreements, dividend policies, merger and acquisition policies. You yourself know these things because you were a CEO of a big company once upon a time. Did you anticipate how Congress would move in to take control of the banks when you made these initial loans?CHENEY: No, I don’t believe we did. I don’t recall any debate within the administration. There may have been some over at Treasury or someplace that focused on the extent of which government would try to control these institutions once they provided financing for them. You know, I’ve got experiences going back to the wage price controls in the Nixon administration where, in effect, we had what I think was a terrible mistake, in that case a Republican administration, where moved in and tried to control the wages, prices and profits of every enterprise in America. It was a huge mistake. We finally got out of it, but it took a long time to do it, and it does a lot of damage.
If you liked that, just wait, it gets better:
CHENEY: Well, some of us at the time wanted GM to go bankrupt, go to Chapter 11.KUDLOW: Were you in that camp?CHENEY: I was.
Essentially, Cheney is saying that he was against bailout nation and Bush overruled him. I'm not surprised. Cheney has always been a much more genuine small-govt. guy than Bush ever was.
That said, maybe Quinn Hillyer was right: Cheney, not Bush, should have been President!!!
- Cahnman's blog
- Login or register to post comments


Comments
Sure, Cheney believes in goverment of 1- himself
Like the time when Cheney said "Reagan proved deficits don't matter" when responding to a question about spending.
Cheney sure does believe in small government. A government where the executive branch, has dictatorial powers. A government where he could get rid of the 2 other branches.
For the Record...
...Reagan proved deficits of 5-6% of GDP don't matter. It's an open question whether deficits of 13-15% matter. For better or worse, we'll know the answer to to that one in a few years.
What did he prove?
How did Reagan prove decifits didn't matter? He raised taxes multiple times, even during the recession.
Deficits don't matter when staving off a depression. They do matter during an economic expanision when you should be cutting spending.