Barack Obama

Opportunistic infections plague Dodd's health care tour

Chris Dodd's effort to change the subject for the 2010 election to health care made a pit stop yesterday at Derby's Griffin Hospital.

Since the Senator got it from both sides, maybe he should have skipped the event and checked himself in.

Before he got there, he was greeted by a picket line of protesters from Dump Dodd. This is a sight he was unaccustomed to seeing in his travels around Connecticut.

img252.jpg

Then it got worse, Dodd may have thought he was going to run a pep rally for Obama-style "health care reform", but was confronted with a cadre of militants demanding the immediate adoption of single payer health insurance.

Needless to say, it looks like it was ugly.

DERBY — A “town hall discussion” on health care reform held at Griffin Hospital Saturday became contentious when advocates of a single-payer health insurance system shouted at U.S. Sen. Christopher Dodd to put the plan back “on the table.”.......The two people evicted from the meeting in Derby Saturday were members of the group Single Payer Action. Russell Mokhiber of West Virginia, formerly of Simsbury, was the first to stand and shout at Dodd. He asked him several times, “Why did you take single pay off the table?” Then he added, “Tell us about your corporate connections.”Jerry Kann of New York was the second person to stand and ask Dodd why he had taken the single-payer proposal “off the table.” He, too, was escorted from the building. 

The Democrats in general have a rather large problem on their hands which us poor Republicans can;t solve.  There are millions of lefties out there who actually believed their party's diatribes and think the Democrats are going to hand the Gitmo detainees a plane ticket home and an ACLU lawyer; and implement every social policy pipe dream that got a favorable mention in Mother Jones or the Nation.  

The Obama  Adminstration and folks like Dodd now have to cater to Rachel Maddow's whims as well as trying to run a government. Reap what you sow, folks.

Chris Dodd is a lot of things, but if you think he's going to crush the private insurance industry in CT, which only accounts for 65,000 jobs and is the highest concentration of such jobs in the nation, might I suggest you move on to marijuana legalization.

The internal contradictions of "health care reform" are rather immense; it appears to be the theory that somehow better management will lower costs to consumers; lower costs to the government. cover everybody, and maintain the expected standard of care.  I'm not bright enough to figure out how this is going to work, but then again maybe Peter Orslag has invented a perpetual motion machine in his spare time.  It doesn't seem NY Governor Paterson has had much luck reducing the excess cost of his state's health care system  and closing hospitals and laying off insurance workers is not going to be an easy sell in what is likely to be a jobless economic recovery.

So, the Obama team has decided that rather than engage in the merits of the issue, it will merely accuse skeptics of "swiftboating". To wit.

We knew healthcare reform would face fierce opposition -- and it's begun. As we speak, the same people behind the notorious "swiftboat" ads of 2004 are already pumping millions of dollars into deceptive television ads. Their plan is simple: torpedo healthcare reform before it sees the light of day by scaring the public and distorting the President's approach

 Dunno guys, looks like the more dangerous squadron is coming at you from your exposed left flank, arguing you guys aren;t socialist enough.  Gonna explain why healthcare costs money to the likes of them?

Looks like this prescription isn't going to restore the ailing Dodd back to political health.  Then again, every day he spends on this is a day he isn't socializing the financial services industry.

* Full disclosure: My wife works in the CTICU at a local CT acute care hospital (Not Griffin).

Slouching Towards Bankruptcy

Podcast Show Notes

Gay Gene no more. (Hat Tip: Idaho Values Alliance.)

Yes we can...have military tribunals.

No, we can't...release torture photos.

Social Security and Medicare accelerate path towards bankruptcy . (Hat Tip: Michelle Malkin.) 

Click here to download, click here to add this podcast to your Itunes

IMPORTANT: Please take our listener survey

 

Americans shifting right on some issues ... why?

In addition to the shift in the prolife direction mentioned here:

http://www.thenextright.com/t-d-williams/stunning-reversal-majority-of-a...

We see shifts on other issues in the right-wing direction.

Support for gun control is at its lowest level in 40 years of polling.

http://blog.nj.com/njv_scott_bach/2009/05/support_plummets_for_resrictio...

Four different polls recently point to declining support for gun restrictions as the answer to crime. In October, a Gallup poll found that fewer Americans than ever favor handgun bans, based on Gallup's 49 year history of polling on the issue. Support fell from a high of 60% in 1959 to a low of less than 30% in 2008. The same trend repeats itself in a question on whether more restrictions are needed on the sales of all firearms, not just handguns.

In addition, three different media polls taken in April reflect plummeting support for gun control. CNN found support has fallen by double digits to less than 40% while an ABC News-Washington Post poll found that more than 60% support enforcing current laws against criminals rather than passing new laws restricting the rights of law abiding citizens. NBC News and The Wall Street Journal found that support for a ban on rifles has fallen by a third in the last 18 years.

All of these polls show what peaceable gun owners already know - that support for the Second Amendment is the dominant belief in America today, and the fallacy that restricting the rights of honest citizens will impact crime has been exposed for what it is.

What the heck is going on? How could Americans get so gung ho over the second amendment and life while supporting the most leftwing candidate in history? Maybe you didnt notice during Obama's magnificent campaign last year, but he did the Kabuki dance on multiple issues:

  • He opposed gay marriage and the Cali Prop 8
  • He forcefully denounced deficits and promised to go after wasteful spending

If he didn't have the track record of the most liberal Senator in the US Senate, you'd might confuse him with a conservative. THAT WAS PROBABLY THE INTENTION. He fooled many uninformed voters into sounding more moderate/open than he really was.

What this has done is make it safe to be pro-life, pro-2ndA, pro-tax-cuts and still support Obama. Since these things in the past were associated with Republicans, people may have been dissuaded from saying they were prolife. They might have thought 'only Republicans hold that position'. This will lead to seeming contradictions, such as many pro-life, pro-2ndA people expressing support for a President who is in reality a pro-abort President and has members of his party eager to ban guns.

Now here's the hard part - come 2010, when the pro-life, pro-2ndA, pro-fiscal responsibility folks who got gulled into voting for Obama in 2008 look at the fruits of the Democrat Congress.... will they still vote for Democrats? Not if they push their gun banning, taxpayer-funded abortions, trillion-dollar deficits and huge boondoggle spending agenda.

Crossposted at Travis Monitor:

http://travismonitor.blogspot.com/2009/05/us-is-shifting-right-on-some-i...

Grappling with Obama's Huge Personal Popularity

Republicans looking for a comeback have yet to come to terms with a basic fact in today's polling: Obama's strongly favorable personal ratings.

Too much of what passes for sea changes in public opinion on policy are in fact residual effects of a narrow partisan advantage magnified by the huge personal popularity of that party's leader. This is how JFK's political position was never seriously dented or in doubt. Or how Ronald Reagan always seemed to bounce back from serious political crises. In Reagan's case, the Gipper's personal magnetism created an opportunity to move the country to the right. Obama is now doing the same for the left.

The tale of the tape is indeed telling here. Obama's personal popularity stayed remarkably stable throughout the course of the campaign, and the average unfavorable rating barely ever cracked 35%. Obama the campaigner looks downright polarizing compared to Obama the President, who now sports a 65/25 fav/unfav in the Pollster.com average.

Why is this important? Republicans right now haven't the slightest idea of how to reduce the President's appeal because they've never actually done it before. It would be one thing if Obama had become a controversial figure during the campaign, like Bill Clinton did in 1992, providing fodder for a comeback once he did get into office, but that possibility scarcely exists today.

While personality may not be everything, and real-world policy outcomes provide opportunities for inflection points, it rarely ever works out that a President's policy agenda is unsuccessful while he remains personally popular. Yes, there are weird situations where a President might be personally loathed (Clinton post-Monica) but politically successful, but not (that I know of) the other way around.

While attempts to remake Republican policy may be all well and good, to pretend the American people will listen to new policy ideas in a vacuum, without reference to their satisfaction (or lack thereof) with Obama is silly.

This hopelessness with respect to Obama's popularity might be cause for more long-ball type thinking and for cultivating charismatic young leaders who too can put an attractive face on conservative ideas, not for seeking short-term tactical wins. Paradoxically, the more irrelevant Republicans become, the easier it is (or should be) to think outside the box. And it is in this intellectual ferment that a comeback will be born.

Embracing the Party of No: Sample Talking Point

In a previous post, I endorsed the party of No.  Here's a sample talking point to demonstrate how it will work:

My fellow Americans, are you as insulted by our 44th President as I am?  He wants us to capitulate to his agenda when we know it's bad for our country.  If President Obama wants to demand capitulation to his agenda, he should know the silent majority of Americans disagree with him.  Just a few examples:

The Silent Majority of Americans reject bailouts.

The Silent Majority of Americans reject Health Care Rationing.

The Silent Majority of Americans reject Energy Tax Hikes.

Do you support the the Obama Administration OVER America's silent majority?

Remember: It's crucial to make the public hate the other guy more

 

Embrace the Party of NO!!!

Fred Barnes has a must read piece in the upcoming Weekly Standard.  Extended quote:

mproving the party's image is a worthy cause, but it isn't what Republicans ought to be emphasizing right now. They have a more important mission: to be the party of no. And not just a party that bucks Obama and Democrats on easy issues like releasing Gitmo terrorists in this country, but one committed to aggressive, attention-grabbing opposition to the entire Obama agenda.

Many Republicans recoil from being combative adversaries of a popular president. They shouldn't. Opposing Obama across-the-board on his sweeping domestic initiatives makes sense on substance and politics. His policies--on spending, taxes, health care, energy, intervention in the economy, etc.--would change the country in ways most Americans don't believe in. That's the substance. And a year or 18 months from now, after those policies have been picked apart and exposed and possibly defeated, the political momentum is likely to have shifted away from Obama and Democrats.

This scenario has occurred time and again. Why

do you think Democrats won the House and Senate in 2006 and bolstered their majorities in 2008? It wasn't because they were more thoughtful, offered compelling alternatives, or had improved their brand. They won because they opposed unpopular policies of President Bush and exploited Republican scandals in Congress. They were highly partisan and not very nice about it.

If Republicans scan their history, they'll discover unbridled opposition to bad Democratic policies pays off. Those two factors, unattractive policies plus strong opposition, were responsible for the Republican landslides in 1938, 1946, 1966, 1980, and 1994. A similar blowout may be beyond the reach of Republicans in 2010, but stranger things have happened in electoral politics. They'll lose nothing by trying.

....

Obama may not be as vulnerable as Clinton was, but his policies are. There's no reason for Republicans to hold back. It's evident now that Obama and the congressional Democrats have no interest in compromise. Their intent is to push far-reaching liberal policies through Congress quickly and with minimal debate. Obama's health care scheme would bring the country one step from a single-payer system. His plan to limit carbon emissions would give the federal government unprecedented power over the economy while emasculating the investors, entrepreneurs, and practically everyone else in the business community.

The Republicans have fertile ground to plow. The public is already dubious of a government-run health insurance plan, the core of Obama-Care. And there's plenty more for Republicans to focus on, including the threat of a government panel that decides which medical practices are covered and which are ostracized. Defeating ObamaCare, given Democratic majorities on Capitol Hill, may be difficult but it's not an impossibility. If Republicans lead the charge, health care providers and consumers are likely to join the active opposition. Otherwise, they'll remain passive.

Obama

says his policy to restrict greenhouse gases, known as cap and trade, is "market-based." It isn't. The cap on emissions would be imposed by a government panel. Polls show the majority of Americans disapprove of this. Worse for Obama, Frank Newport, the Gallup boss, says most Americans don't believe global warming poses a serious danger. So why choke off economic growth?

Then there are the unforced errors of the Obama administration to take advantage of. The president's decision to close Gitmo has backfired badly, leaving him with terrorists on his hands and nowhere to put them. The takeover of GM and Chrysler has raised concerns, even in Europe, over the competence and judgment of the Obama team. The American public is lopsidedly against further bailouts of the Big 2.

Republican efforts to escape being tagged the party of no are understandable. The label gives Democrats and the media echo chamber a talking point. Should the NCNA come up with new ideas that spruce up the party's image, that's helpful. The criticism of the council by social conservatives, by the way, is downright counter-productive. Their attacks merely delight Democrats and the press. But no matter how restrained and sensible Republicans sound or how many useful ideas they develop, they're probably stuck with the party of no label. They have more to gain by actually accepting the role and taking on Obama vigorously. If they come to be dubbed the party of no, no, no, a thousand times no, all the better. It will mean they're succeeding.

 

I couldn't agree more.  From 2005 to 2008, the Democrats were the Party of No.  They never offered a positive alternative unless you consider "Hope" and "Change" to be serious positive alternatives.

The Dems and the Drive-By's are going to label us the party of No no matter what we do.  While alternative policies are a decent idea, and shouldn't be shunned, they're less important than getting the public to put down the Obama cool aid.  Remember, President Bush was once faaar more popular than Obama, then the Democrats subjected him to 6 years of unrelenting assault and we all know how well that worked.

Remember, the key to winning election is making the public hate the other guy more.

That is all.

Cahnman out.

Defeating ObamaCare: The 12 Crucial DEMOCRAT Senators

Based on the Mortgage Cramdown vote, these Democrats are our best hope for beating ObamaCare.

1) Max Baucus (MT) - (406) 761-1574 - Senate Finance Committee Chair

2) Michael Bennet (CO) - (719) 328-1100

3) Robert Byrd (W. Va) - (304) 264-4626

4) Thomas Carper (DE) - (302) 856-7690

5) Byron Dorgan (ND) - (701) 852-0703

6) Tim Johnson (SD) - (605) 332-8896

7) Mary Landrieu (LA) - (337) 436-6650

8) Blanche Lincoln (AR) - (870)382-1023

9) Ben Nelson (NE) - (308) 631-7614

10) Mark Pryor (AR) - (501) 324-6336

11) Arlen Specter (PA) - 570-346-2006 - I Know; just think about how much fun it'll be when he stabs the Dems in the Back!!!

12) John Tester (MT) - (406) 365-2391

Honorable Mention - Evan Bayh (IN), Mark Begich (AK), Kent Conrad (ND), Bill Nelson (FL)

We can Beat this Thing!!!

I hope this helps.

Cahnman out.

America the Beautiful Cripple

Washington on Crutches

By Rose Pedenko and Tanya Simon

When the president alludes to his mandate the messages are delivered with the smug satisfaction that he need not explain himself nor defend the mind-boggling amount of taxpayer dollars he is throwing at every problem that comes his way, much like throwing spaghetti against the wall.  But in his case, if it sticks, we’re cooked.

His fan club, apparently so overwhelmed with his rock star “tude,” doggedly cling to the “hope” he promised.  “Hope” and “Change” were, after all, burned into his teleprompter.

What has become as dangerous as a truckload of C‑4 is that hope, by itself, is not always enough.  Those same BHO groupies are “stuck on hope” because they still subsist on the incessant superficial media coverage of President Bush’s financial blunders.

Obama’s followers have yet to understand or accept where their fearless leader has taken Americans in these first 100 days – straight down Thomas Crapper’s throne.  If they persist in their blind adoration, they’ll be enjoying their just desserts a la commode.

Former Assistant Secretary of the Treasury, Paul Craig Roberts, in his March 2008 article entitled The Collapse of American Power, offered this bleak assessment: “…the fact of the matter is that the U.S. is bankrupt.”  That statement was made during the Bush Administration.  What conservative Americans are learning, while liberals continue to savor the Chosen One, is that one trillion dollars of debt has morphed into several trillions, a staggering amount most humans cannot wrap their brain around.  It is turning recovery into a mathematical impossibility.

The “in the tank” media, reports every little Bear market rally as if recovery was at hand.  And whenever Ben Bernanke speaks, his presentation is reminiscent of “When E.F. Hutton talks, people listen.”  That’s the joke of course, because we all know what happened to E.F. Hutton.

And so goes Wall Street.  Not so very long ago, everyone listened to Alan Greenspan too.  And look where we are now.  “The thrill is gone” as B.B. King said, “free from the spell” of Wall Street economists.

For you recalcitrant liberals, there is the National Bankruptcy Survival Guide, in which Seth Van Brocklin explains the difficulty in quantifying the national debt.  As he states: “Once numbers start getting up into the trillions, they literally become mind-numbing.”

By way of illustration, Van Brocklin explains just how large one trillion dollars actually is:  “If you were able to earn $1 per second continuously, you would accumulate $1 Billion after 33 years.”  But, to make $1 Trillion at the rate of $1 per second, “it would take 33,000 years.”  We’re pretty sure you can now visualize twelve times that amount, which is roughly the national debt under the current Administration.

It’s difficult not to feel and sound morose at times.  The present Administration (as well as the numerous fiscal blunders and catastrophes of previous Administrations) have forced the American People to duck and dodge an unrelenting monetary meteor shower which is hitting us all left, right, and center.  Even the Administration’s indignation over Bernie Madoff seems rather comical when you step back in order to see a bigger picture, that is, the federal government now running the biggest Ponzi scheme in history.  But with a solid majority, the bad guys aren’t even getting a slap on the wrist.

The president rode into office on a wave of popularity with a promise to fix the economic mess he inherited (as we are constantly reminded).  He’s smart, but not that smart.  If he were the brainchild his followers touted he is during those nightmarish months of campaigning, he wouldn’t now be crushing the country with a spending tsunami.  And as the country is crushed, so are our lives, our livelihoods, our dreams and aspirations, and, most tragically, our children’s future.

As elected leader of the U.S., one would either have to be totally unprepared, inexperienced or ignorant to not understand the magnitude of this economic crisis.  A logical conclusion would be that this President is either too ignorant, OR fully understands and is lying to Americans -- perhaps running the economy, and thereby the nation, into the ground to realize a larger ideological agenda in the naïve belief it’s for the greater good.

The saddest part is this: even if conservatives were to reclaim the majority in Congress, slash taxes across the board, break the hold unions have on industry, resurrect manufacturing and purge entitlements to illegal immigrants, those efforts would only be a blip on the radar of history.

While the media doesn’t even try to conceal their bias anymore, they continue to squash the opposition through the denigration of patriotically concerned Americans who are now fighting back to save our Republic.  It is not a pretty picture, and there will be no honor at the end of the day for the media.

This is why the TEA party participant numbers are swelling.  No matter what kind of negative hype the media invents, citizens are on to them and there’s a new wave of optimism about to crush the Left’s favorite milieu – carefully crafted ignorance.

We know for a fact (and readily admit) that there are just as many academically intelligent people on the left as there are on the right. After all, America wasn’t conceived and built by dummies.  We, therefore, cannot understand why logical and common sense answers are being cast aside or rejected entirely—the way a demented fisherman tosses the filets of his catch into the drink and tries to sell us the innards.  Americans won’t be buying your stinking innards much longer.  Looming inflation won’t let them.

Our greatest fear is searching for, but not finding, viable solutions to reverse the trade and industry mess in which we find ourselves. The more research we find out, the more we realize it is becoming impossible to clean up after this disaster.

Americans must find a way to strike a balance between regulation, to protect against greed, but at the same time allow everyone to pursue their dreams unhindered by a parasitic socialist system designed to quash our freedoms.

The TEA party participants are looking for that balance and we will not settle for less.

How Long Will It Take...

...until Barack Obama throws Arlen Specter under the Bus?!?

Over/Under 1 year?

My personal guess is that it's about a year.

"This is not the Arlen Specter I used to know..."

"...Arlen Specter is just a guy who lives in my neighborhood."

That is all.

Cahnman out.

Unemployed Because of Obama

Unemployment Line

by Lance Thompson

The eager applicant, clutching his resume, strides confidently through the doors of the Enemies of America Human Resources Agency, and is immediately disheartened by the long lines of would-be terrorists, assassins, saboteurs and spies seeking jobs from the overworked bureaucrats of the jihad.

The employment counselor, Mulli al Rashiri, in his traditional Ghutra and short-sleeved thobe, motions the applicant to a chair.

“My name is Mohammed,” announces the applicant, handing over his resume.  “I want to join the fight against America.”

Mulli the counselor glances at the resume and shakes his head.  “I wish you’d come a year ago.  Everybody was hiring–al Qaeda, the Taliban, Iran death squads.  Could have got you a free trip to Venezuela just for an interview.  But now–nothing”

“But I am qualified in demolitions, firearms, subversion,” Mohammed pleads.  “I was voted Most Likely to Be Interviewed by MSNBC by my terrorist training class.”

“Just no need these days.”

“I can infiltrate the CIA, learn all their secret interrogation methods.”

“The Obama administration has already made those public.  And even if they hadn’t spilled all their secret interrogation techniques, the American Attorney General is prosecuting the lawyers who authorized them.  We have nothing to fear from the CIA.”

“I’m very good at propaganda.  I could devise campaigns to make the Americans look weak and untrustworthy to other nations.“

The counselor holds up his hand.  “Obama’s already done that.  He has abandoned the Eastern Europeans, belittled the British, kowtowed to the Russians, befriended Hugo Chavez, and answered the North Korean missile launch by promising not to weaponize space.  There is nothing you can do to weaken or embarrass the Americans that their president hasn’t already done.”

“How about sabotage?  I could penetrate their advanced aircraft factories and destroy their state-of-the-art fighter planes.”

“The Secretary of Defense already did that when he cancelled the F-22 program.  No need to destroy their front-line fighters–the Americans are scrapping the entire program.”

Desperate, Mohammed struggles to find a place in the fight.  “I could learn white collar crime.  I could work on Wall Street, destroy their financial system.”

“Obama has already taken care of that with his stimulus and spending bills.  America is spending trillions of dollars they don’t have, nationalizing banks and private industry, bringing in socialized medicine.  Obama is engineering the total collapse of the American financial system.  Do you really think you can do worse than that?”

“But I need a job.”

“So does every terrorist in the world.  Look, when Bush was in charge, and we were losing twenty, thirty, fifty holy warriors a day, we were desperate for new recruits.  But now I get thousands of applications for every job.  Even to be an entry-level community organizer for ACORN, you have to know somebody.  Ever since Obama and the Democrats took over, the job market in terrorism, insurrection, and anti-American subversion has plummeted.  Unemployment among terrorists has skyrocketed.”

“What should I do?”

“There’s always a need for suicide bombers.”  Mulli the counselor points to a long, stationary line of last-resort applicants.  “Good benefits, full retirement.”

Mohammed shakes his head.  “I was looking for something with more of a future.”

Mulli checks his computer.  “Al Franken is looking for a chief of staff.”

Mohammed pretends not to hear.  “I have a master’s degree from the Anti-American University in Tehran.  Maybe I could teach.”

Mulli shakes his head.  “It would take years of hard work and study to be able to indoctrinate American students to hate their country more successfully than the subversive teachers, textbooks and social programs already established in the American educational system.”

Mohammed’s hopes are crushed.  “All my life, I have studied how evil the United States is.  I hate America.  I want to tear America down.  There must be something I can do.”

“Have you thought about becoming a community organizer?”

Syndicate content