energy independence

It’s All About Energy.

The DeMarxists are fumbling all over themselves to cover for Obama’s growing exposure to the energy disaster that his party and his politics have brought to fruition. Fair enough, he didn’t start it. He has been, and is, the ultra-left radical environmentalists’ poster-boy for advancing their death grip on America, Americans and the American economy.

Good gravy, we all saw this stuff happening… at least I did. I was fortunate enough to see through the environut thing in the beginning, which made for some lively and heated discussions on my college campus. I wasn’t very popular with the liberals because I kept writing rebuttals, shredding their pet nutcake theories in the college paper which, to their credit, they published… although they leaned left in much of their other content.

Perhaps it was this early disbelief that has kept me paying attention to the way the ‘environmental movements’ et al have fostered the slow but steady degradation of our ability to be energy independent. No matter which energy ‘front’ you care to examine… nuclear, natural gas, coal, oil, oil shale, oil sands or hydroelectric energy… they are against it. That is, they’re against us using our own energy resources. It’s just dandy with the radical environmentalists if we’re held in thrall for our energy requirements by foreign governments, who definitely don’t have our best interests at heart.

The radical environmental groups are uniformly leftist and pro-socialist. The Green Party’s published policy paper reads like the Communist Manifesto. These communist groups, in the guise of ‘concerned environmentalists’, have been active in the halls of government for well over forty years. Government officials and politicians have been bought wholesale by the EnviroNazis, fostering for instance the emergence of the single most destructive agency in Washington, the EPA.

When you next go to the gas pump, just think to yourself… “From Obama with love”. And then just think how lovely it will be to bid the unlamented, feckless Obama “adieu”.

Semper Vigilans, Semper Fidelis

© Skip MacLure 2011

Article from Reuters: Obama open to expanding offshore drilling areas

 This Reuters article that I read Wednesday indicates, "Obama has said he would be open to expanding offshore drilling areas as part of a comprehensive legislation to address America's energy problems." 

I agree with Republican lawmakers that it is essential to encourage President Obama to OK the offshore drilling plan. 

The moratorium on oil and natural gas exploration in the outer continental shelf that expired on September 30, 2008 was put into place during a very different time in our nation’s history.  Let’s not turn back the clock by imposing another ban.

Oil and natural gas exploration in the outer continental shelf will create additional U.S. jobs. Individuals who worked in this industry had wages in 2006 that were more than double the national average.

Production of oil and natural gas has brought billions of dollars in revenue to state and federal governments and represents a significant revenue source to the federal government.

For those of you who feel strongly about this issue you can find more information about offshore oil and natural gas exploration at the North Carolina Energy Forum website (http://www.ncenergyforum.com). The North Carolina Energy Forum is a community of concerned citizens who are committed to achieving energy security for our country. You can also join the NC Energy Forum.

What Kind of Stimulus Do We Need?

Crossposted at The Rockefeller Republican

When it comes to fighting recessions, there's a tendency to see "fiscal stimulus" packages as wasteful, as a form of "throwing money at the problem." The critics have a point. But the conclusion that therefore we should do nothing is also wrong. Instead, careful attention should be paid to the details. Just as a family pinched for cash might find borrowing for the purchase of a new car or appliance prudent while taking a vacation in Las Vegas wouldn't be, some government programs to combat recession make sense while others do not.Three criteria are crucial for evaluating fiscal stimulus packages. First, does the program target the weakness in the economy that caused the recession, or is it largely peripheral? Second, are the funds going to be spent in a timely fashion? Third, does the program fundamentally strengthen the economy going forward into the expansion phase? A look at the economy's current circumstances suggests that a large fiscal stimulus is needed, but a badly designed one will, in the words of an old song, merely leave America "another day older and deeper in debt." -Lawrence B. Lindsey in The Weekly Standard.

While he goes on to state that tax cuts would be the most efficient stimulus, which I do not necessarily agree with, his point about the stimulus fundamentally strengthening the possibility of future expansion is extremely pertinent. I argued earlier that any stimulus package should be focused on driving us towards energy independence and Mr. Lindsey's criteria support my thesis. First, our hyper-dependency on foreign oil, while not e direct cause of our current woes is certainly a central player in them. Second, work could be started very quickly on various projects if the requisite red tape could be cut through, which a national stimulus plan could do. And third, our collective future would be far rosier with the prospect of a self sufficient energy system in place for the next generation.

 

Congress needs to act now to spend $1.2 Billion

Now this is goining to have the sound of "man bites dog" on this blog, but Congress ought to set to in the lame duck session this week and insist that the Energy Department immediately spend $1.2 billion.

It's the best bargain for public money I've seen in a long while.

The Strategic Petroleum Reserve is short 26 million barrels from its 727 million barrel capacity.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Strategic_Petroleum_Reserve

It had been filling at the rate of 70,000 barrels/day when noted energy experts like Senator Chuck Schumer insisted this be stopped so as to keep the feds from adding to oil demand, thus boosting oil prices. This was when the price of crude was going to infinity and beyond.

At the time, eminently reasonable But of course, they then passed legislation forbidding the Bush administration from buying any more oil.

In order to take advantage of the oil bubble's collapse (prices are down around $40/bbl) the legislation needs to be repealed. NOW.

The window to take advantage of this historical crash in oil prices may be short. OPEC meets on December 17 and almost cretaintly will shut in lots of production to try and drive the price back up.

Acting now in the lame duck session to repeal the SPR purchase ban is good for taxpayers, good for consumers and  improves our energy independence. And as soon as the ban is lifted the Energy Department ought ot buy up as much oil as it can immediately.

If they don't act; I do not want the likes of Reid, Pelosi and Schumer bleating next year about energy independence--topping off SPR is a quick cost -effective way to improve the situation now, not some green pipe dream decades away from market.

While we are at it; maybe DOE ought to lock in oil futures for December 2009 delivery.  We might like to emulate Southwest Airlines and set a fixed price for future fuel needs for the Pentagon and the Low Income Energy Assistance Program.  I'd love to see us get heating oil to the northeastern non-profits cheaper than the tinhorn dictator Hugo Chavez and his lefty Kennedy friends.     

It's an idea that makes perfect sense. So, don;t expect anyone in Congress to do this. 

Ad Critic: Citizen Pickens Goes to Washington

Billionaire oilman and Republican uber-donor T. Boone Pickens has plunked down $58 million to promote his solution to the energy crisis which he calls, strangely enough, the Pickens Plan.  He’s sinking the bulk of that money into a massive issue advertising campaign and his first ad went on the air last week:

This spot accomplishes a very difficult feat.  It makes two arguments to two diametrically opposed constituencies… and does it effectively.  Conservatives will eat up the patriotic/energy independence message while liberals will latch onto the environmentalist imagery.  Pickens himself is an effective spokesman, but by tying the plan directly to his own personal brand he has forfeited a number of key advantages.

Why The Price of Gas Is A Winning Issue

I believe there is a chance we can get on the right side of public disgust over gas prices like we did on taxes in the '70s and '80s, but we have to act decisively in framing Democrats as consistently anti-energy and against using every weapon in our arsenal (OCS, ANWR, shale oil, as well as conservation) to combat record-high gas prices. -Patrick

It was Energy Week over at my blog Weapons of Mass Discussion last week and with the topic still ringing as relevent, I thought it might be worth taking a look at some of the polling which shows that campaigning against the Pelosi Premium is a winner.

Let's start with Gallup (May 28th), where we discover that 57% of the American people favor "drilling in U.S. coastal and wilderness areas now off limits."  Now there is some bad news in that poll too as 53% think that price controls are a good idea (45% do not).  While 58% think that releasing some of the Strategic Petrolium Reserves (SPR) is a good idea (while 40% do not) only 49% support halting new shipments to the SPR.  The statistic that will have the treehuggers running for the hills is that 20% support gas rationing while 79% do not.

What the GOP needs: Visionary Leaders

Today the congressional caucus of the GOP unveiled their “bold new economic plan” for stealing some of the wind from the democratic sails as we move forward into preparations for the general election. These plans included agressive proposals for finally pushing forward with oil and gas exploration and extraction, and a move towards long overdue tax reform.

 

“To protect consumers, the House GOP plan would harness new technologies and unlock America’s energy resources in the Alaskan coastal plain, deep ocean energy zones, and elsewhere to lower gas prices, create jobs, and break America’s dependence on foreign sources of energy. To protect taxpayers from pork-barreling politicians and wasteful Washington spending, our plan would establish an immediate earmark moratorium and prohibit federal spending from growing faster than the overall economy. And to protect American families and small businesses, the Republican blueprint would stop the Democrats’ largest tax hike in history, eliminate the Alternative Minimum Tax, and give taxpayers the option of paying a flat tax and filing their taxes on a single page.”

http://republicanleader.house.gov/News/DocumentSingle.aspx?DocumentID=93622

 

After taking a moment to give our people a mental clap on the back, frustration and to some extent despair reared it’s ugly head in my heart.

Our radical new plan, is in effect a watered down version of some of the platform issues that made Mike Huckabee so attractive to his supporters. The same Huckabee vision that was shot down by party elites as one that was not well thought out, or practically impossible to accomplish.

When I thought further of the tumultuous ride we have all been on in this econonomy and society in general these last crazy months of the political silly season, I found more and more examples of Huckabee’s foresight on issues that later came to be the talk of the day.

Let’s start with the economy. During one of the early debates, Huckabee was the only GOP candidate to answer a question about the state of the economy with a ‘non party line,’ but truthful answer. For the working class American, the economy was not doing very well at all; and he was right. Within a month of that debate, the sqeeze that the working class was feeling, had crept into the middle class sensibility, and the stock market was on the fritz. Now the struggling economy is “issue number one”.

On the war on terror, Huckabee wrote a comprehensive analysis of current strategy in the middle east, and proposed that we needed to be focusing more on Pakistan and holding them more accountable for helping us in the GWOT, given the amount of resources we are pouring into their coffers. He was ridiculed for suggesting that the Bush administration had a ‘bunker mentality’ to the war, and his position on Pakistan was laughed out of town. A few weeks later, Bhutto was assasinated, democracy took a few steps backward in Pakistan, and an environment of political unrest increased the chances that Pakistan would fall into the hands of the extremists in its midst. Who’s laughing now?

Anybody who ever watched a republican debate was sure to hear the mantra from Huckabee, ‘We need to be able to feed ourselves, fuel ourselves, and defend ourselves,” if we are to stay free.

He suggested, again to ridicule, that America needed to start exploring all options, alternative and fossil, to ensure our energy independence within ten years. He even went so far as to draw paralells with the pace of the progress that was made by Kennedy in the space race. He did not talk about long term planning, he talked about doing it NOW, and agressively. Now we are paying over four dollars a gallon for gas, and everybody wants to ‘Drill now” with the ultimate effect of possibly being energy independent within the decade.

Huckabee talked about the importance of being able to feed ourselves, and implementing policies that would insure that our food supply did not have to come from external sources. This may seem to be common sense, but he was the ONLY candidate, on either side of the isle to talk openly about food sustainability on the campaign trail. Now, the world is in the middle of a food crisis. Rice and flour are being rationed at Wal-Mart and Cost-Co. Food prices are going up in part because of poor policy implemented regarding biofuel mandates, and there are riots in the streets in developed and third world countries alike. why was Huckabee the only one with the vision to adress this critical subject as part of his policy platform?

Huckabee also talked about the danger inherant in outsourcing our self defense. Again, this was not part of ANY other candidates talking points on the stump. Along comes the scandal of the outsourcing of our fuel tanker pentagon contract to a European based company. Now ‘Outsourcing our defense’ is the latest buzzword on the talk circuit.

Huckabee was howled out of town for daring to suggest that our Tax system needs a massive overhaul. He was considered naieve for adopting a platform issue in the Fair Tax that ‘could never be passed.’ Well somebody needs to do something!! Tax reform MUST be on the agenda of one party or the other, and whoever latches on to it first will have a winning platform for years to come. It looks like the GOP is taking a step in the right direction with the disclosures in today’s statement.

Huckabee was the only GOP candidate to call the stimulus package the farce that it is, pointing out that it only stimulates the economies of the very countries with whom we have a terrible trade deficit imbalance. Many lauded, and some decried his suggestion that working on restoring our infrastructure would  stimulate our local economies, while providing jobs and strengthening the foundations that ensure our transportation veins remain open for commerce. The tragedy of the bridge collapse in Minneapolis. subsequently made the subject of our rotting infrastructure take center stage for weeks on end. Now many in congress on the left and the right are advocating for infrastructure development in their home states as a means of stimulating economic growth.

When all is said and done, time and time again, the wisdom and foresight that Huckabee has demonstrated in sensing what issues need to be highlighted and adressed is nothing short of astonishing. It shouldn’t be, he has governed for ten and a half years successfully, even if his detractors prefer the spin that he is a preacher on a political holiday.

It is high time that this man get some of the respect that he deserves for being a brilliant and visionary politician. If you’re going to adopt and implement his ideas, at least have the courage to admit that he’s not the ‘hick, knuckledragging, snake oil salesman, Huckabilly’ that so many of you, liberal and conservative alike, have deemed him to be.

America may never know the gem it lost by not having the courage to believe that somone so unorthodox, and yet so intimately connected with her heart, could make it all the way to the oval office. She may yet be lucky enough to benifit from his vision, if John McCain finds the courage in his heart to do the hard thing and offer him the veep spot.

I can only hope.

 

Syndicate content