Jindal

Looking to the Future

Crossposted at Right Minds

I can remember the exact moment I stopped listening to Sean Hannity. In was in November of last year; he was discussing the presidential candidates. Evidently, he felt he was being too hard on one of them, because he blurted out the opinion that the whole group were a great bunch of candidates and that he would happily support whichever one won the nomination. It was, of course, obvious to any rational observer that the GOP was running an absolutely dismal crop of candidates (the three frontrunners at the time were Mitt Romney, Rudy Giuliani, and [cringe] Mike Huckabee), and that the winner would be the best of a bad lot.
 
Fortunately, the best man, at least from an electoral point of view (can you really imagine Mitt Romney competing with Barack Obama?), won the nomination, but John McCain didn’t have much competition. Mitt Romney must be the most uncharismatic man in history—he managed to get the entire conservative punditocracy on his side, but still found a way to lose convincingly. Mike Huckabee never ran a serious campaign; besides, as Frank J. at IMAO pointed out, his name sounds like that of a cartoon family’s dog. Rudy Giuliani was a less likeable, liberal version of John McCain, and his campaign really did (as Joe Biden pointed out—he has his moments) consist of a noun, a verb, and 9/11. And Fred Thompson, though staunchly conservative, and my favorite candidate, never ran a real campaign either. The Republicans ran a weak slate of candidates this election, and it is a miracle that they actually have a real chance of keeping the White House.
 
Fortunately for the GOP, its prospects in 2012 look much brighter. There are a great many talented young conservatives who will be of the right age to run in 2012—as well as some veterans who may be able to use four years experience to become stronger candidates.
 
Sarah Palin is the obvious choice for the 2012 nominee—she is attractive, smart, and conservative, besides being the next in line for the GOP nomination, which is important. It’s hard to imagine a scenario—unless McCain decides to run again, which is unlikely—in which she isn’t the nominee. And she would be a good, maybe even brilliant—choice.
Bobby Jindal would be another excellent choice. He is, perhaps, the most intelligent governor in America, and he conservative credentials are second to none. He’s competent, too—thankfully, Hurricane Ike wasn’t as damaging as was originally feared, but his response to the crisis was exceptional. And like Palin, he is telegenic (if not as good-looking as Palin is) and articulate, both of which are advantages for a candidate following the incoherent Bush and the mumbling McCain.
 
In fact, Jindal may be the GOP’s best hope for the future. His conservative credentials are probably stronger than Palin’s, and his experience is much greater. Rush Limbaugh has called Jindal the “next Reagan”—and he could be right.
 
Mitt Romney just couldn’t get anyone to like him in the primaries—moderates thought he was too conservative, while conservatives thought he was too moderate. Both were right—Romney had distinctly moderate views through most of his career, then exhibited an abrupt rightward shift when he ran for president. Nobody anywhere ever got excited about Romney (except, apparently, Michigan voters). But if he spends the next four years actively promoting conservative causes, and building conservative “street cred” (a term which somehow sounds so incongruous when associated with Mitt Romney), he could very well become a formidable candidate in 2012.
 
Mike Huckabee might have been the candidate most hated by conservatives—with good reason. He was never a very serious candidate; he based his campaign around a smile and a shoeshine, a combination that somehow very nearly got him the nomination. True, he has his conservative lapses, but like Romney, four years spent pushing conservative causes could endear him to many conservatives. And given Huckabee’s immense charisma, he could do in 2012 what he couldn’t do in 2008—take the Republican nomination, and maybe even the presidency.
 
There is, of course, one more possible GOP nominee in 2012—John McCain, provided he wins in 2008. True, it’s hard to imagine a 76-year-old man deciding to run for reelection—but then, John McCain has always gone against the odds. And if his approval ratings are high…well, he might as well go for it.
 
Jindal and Palin would be fantastic nominees, McCain would be acceptable, and Romney and Huckabee have promise. It might seem premature to start thinking about 2012 before the 2008 election is even completed—but the people involved are thinking about it, and conservatives should be as well. If it is anything like 2008, the process will begin in just a couple of years, and conservatives should be ready.

 

The Line Between Audacity and Arrogance

Podcast Show Notes

There's a fine line between audacity and arrogance and Obama seems to keep crossing it. From using a Wailing Wall apperance for political gain (Hat Tip: Right Wing News.) To removing the American flag from the tail of his plane to put his own logo on it.

House Republican Leader: John Boehner. The man with no plan or why House Republican leaders don't want a second contract with America.

Jindal says no to being Veep.

A sweetheart deal for the DNC Host Committee.

Click here to download, click here to add this podcast to your Itunes.

VP Rundown

I've heard an argument that McCain needs to think outside the box.  Make an out-of-left field choice.  I strongly disagree with this way of thinking.  I fail to see how bringing in a novice for the second-highest office in the land would help anyone.

McCain needs a guy who is known.  I've supported Joe Lieberman for the spot but am starting to realize that McCain needs someone with name recognition who will mollify conservatives without alienating the independents and centrist.  Let's go through some names.

Mitt Romney:  A month ago, I would have Romney pegged as a front-runner.  But with Ted Kennedy likely to become worm food in the not-too-distant future, you know Mitt's gonna be angling for a shot at the Senate.

Condi Rice:  No, no, no!  The woman has proven herself to be an even bigger RINO than McCain.  You want to draw conservatives, not anger them further.  Plus, putting a black woman in the spot would be seen as pandering at its worst.

Joe Lieberman:  I've supported Joe based on his strong national security record and the fact that it would be extremely fun watching the Kos crowd howl with rage at the sight.  But, the best running mate is one who complements, not mirrors.

Duncan Hunter:  The darling of right-wing bloggers.  While it would go a long way towards helping McCain regain the favor of the LGF crowd, his poor showing indicates that he lacks mainstream appeal.  And his strong-anti-illegal immigration stance could hurt McCains chances with Latinos, something McCain is trying to avoid.

Rudy Giuliani:  No.  Aside from the fact that his f****d-up personal life would become media fodder, his conservative credentials are highly questionable and it is very difficult to see how he would help McCain.

Charlie Crist:  I don't think so.  Crist brings nothing to the table.  I know he's a front-runner, but he just got elected a couple of years ago.  It's too soon for him.  The only upside is that he is very popular among Florida's blacks and could help offset Obama's popularity, but I'm fishing at best.

Bobby Jindal:  Another top contender.  Like Crist, it's too soon.  I know Johnny's eager to offset the whole age thing, but placing a kitten in the wings to maybe take the place of a lion one day is a disaster waiting to happen.  Add in the fact that Jindal's effectiveness as governor has been questionable and it's a no-go.

Ann Coulter:  Yeah, I know the chance of this happening ranks right up there with the chances of George W. Bush winning the Nobel Peace Price, but it'd make for entertaining TV, wouldn't it.

I'm sure I'm overlooking a few people, but it's late and I'm tired.  Input, as always, is appreciated.

Syndicate content