Powerline tonight had the latest of a multitude of blog posts all to the effect that the Barack Obama health care plan is focused on the concept of telling senior citizens to drop dead. The Powerline post cites the Wall Street Journal article authored by former NY LT. Gov Betsy McCaughey,(who is a better policy wonk than political candidate)
McCaughey argues persuasively that the legislation currently being pushed in Congress would "reduce access to care, pressure the elderly to end their lives prematurely, and doom baby boomers to painful later years
RedState has also opined furiously on the "end of life" provisions in the various Obamacare proposals.
Hello, why is anyone surprised? This is exactly how a bunch of Cook County political hacks operate.
The point is Barack Obama is President in spite of America's seniors. Therefore, politically, he owes them nothing.
51% of voters 60 and over voted for John McCain....the least supportive age group in America for Barack Obama....and for House Democrats
and, guess what, seniors weren't always a GOP base group---the last Democrat elected President, Bill Clinton, found they were his best voter group in 1992.
So, guess what. Seniors demand a lot of medical services and deliver few Democratic votes---especially seniors in rural areas and Red States...so ...hmmm...let's look to cut their stuff first.
Now we know some other groups were more supportive of the Obama election. And how are they liable to fare?
The President tells Katie Couric his plan won't cover illegal immigrants. Other observers beg to differ.
The plan includes some provisions aimed at "diversity." Evidently the import of the Ricci v. DeStefano decision is lost on Capitol Hill policy wonks.
And we know that taxpayer funded abortion will be the law in all 50 states if Obamacare passes.
So we know that the folks promoting various groups of color and the abortion lobby will get what they want out of the Obama bill. And why not. The exit polls show that the black, brown and pro-choice all voted for Obama. Putting their stuff in the bill is the Chicago way.
It appears that the "Blue Dog" Democrats have figured out their constituents are going to be on the short end of this stick. Perhaps they understand the dynamics of their districts a little better than city dweller Nate Silver does.
(Note to Nate: I actually worked for a swing district Congressman. The last thing we ever wanted was to have the President raise controversial issues that would incite the opposition base in our district. This is what you learn actually doing two-party politics)
As for the Blue Dogs, They are probably afraid to have outbursts like this following them around their districts next autumm. See the Blue Dogs are like the Obama camp. They both want to reward their supporters at the expense of everyone else.
The problem the Obama brain trust now faces is the same people who voted for McCain keep the Blue Dogs in office. Forgot that little detail, eh guys?
But, once again. If you begin with the premise that Barack Obama and his allies only want to run the government for the benefit of their political supporters, it makes figuring out the details of their policies, much, much. easier.