September 11

Americans may pay up to $4 trillion for battles

Brown University scholars have released a study of the total expenses of the past ten years of American battles. The conflicts in Iraq and Afghanistan have ended in almost 250,000 people being killed, and may expense upward of $4 trillion or even more ultimately. Post resource - Wars cost American taxpayers almost $4 trillion in past decade by Newsytype.com.

There were over 125,000 Iraqi civilians killed

As reported by Reuters, the expenses of war since the 2001 Sept. 11 attacks are being added up by scholars from Brown University. "Costs of War" was the name of the project. The Watson Institute for International Studies released the project. A site is available to see all the findings. This contains about two dozen scholars from different universities. After President Obama has said $1 trillion would be spent on the Afghanistan battle, the research has come about. It may result in being between $3.4 and $4.4 trillion when you count the expense of the Afghanistan and Iraq wars. Almost 250,000 people are estimated to have been killed. States show that during the battle, there were about 125,000 Iraqi civilians that were killed although journals such as The Lancet was criticized a lot for inaccuracies in estimates, states Al Jazeera.

Interest payments alone in the hundreds of billions

War has caused both the Bush and Obama administrations to borrow heavily. The interest alone is hard to bear. Of the payments already made, there has already been a lot spent. There was $185 billion paid out already. Reuters thinks that more cash will be needed where that came from. CBS reports this number to be around $1 trillion. The president's quote of $1 trillion for war spending is partially accurate; an estimated $1.3 trillion was appropriated for direct war spending. Since the Department of Defense has not yet unveiled its war expenditures, additional expenses are left out of that figure. The amount of money spent just on veterans that were injured in combat is at $36 billion. By 2050, it could possibly be around $900 billion instead though. Other veteran costs, and costs to their families, also have to be paid. That will cost an extra $400 billion. In 2008, there were 181,000 Iraq and Afghanistan battle veterans that got Veterans' Administration benefits, USA Today reports. As of 2006, 947,000 Vietnam vets were receiving similar benefits.

Costs over just working class individuals

It will be decades before everyone can even tally up what the finals costs will be. Besides costs to American taxpayers, the expense to Iraq and Afghanistan in repairing wrecked infrastructure, caring for people with disabilities and lost income from individuals who were killed may never be tallied. A 2010 USA Today article explained that the United States had already spend $44.6 billion by the end of 2009 in rebuilding Iraq which consists of military and security forces. A Foreign Policy article showed how much the U.S. has been doing in Iraq too. The United States has already spent $19 billion on rebuilding efforts. Afghanistan is so decimated that one of few lucrative occupations is cultivating opium. Afghanistan supplied 92 percent of the world's opium last year, according to The Guardian.

Articles cited

Reuters

reuters.com/article/2011/06/29/us-usa-war-idUSTRE75S25320110629

CBS

cbsnews.com/8301-503544_162-20075350-503544.html?tag=stack

Al Jazeera

english.aljazeera.net/news/americas/2011/06/2011629145430649752.html

Costs of War

costsofwar.org/

USA Today on Veterans Benefits

usatoday.com/news/2008-05-11-disabled-vets_N.htm

USA Today on rebuilding Iraq

usatoday.com/news/world/iraq/2010-03-22-iraqcosts_N.htm

Foreign Policy

shadow.foreignpolicy.com/posts/2011/06/13/castles_in_the_sky_the_failure_to_rebuild_afghanistan

The Guardian

MA SEN: John Kerry says, "we were at peace on September 11, 2001"

Well looks like John Kerry has put foot in mouth yet again.  This time he claims that the US was "basically at peace on September 11, 2001."

Sen. John Kerry (D-Mass.) believes that on September 11 "we were basically at peace."

Asked to clarify his remarks, specifically asking about the attacks on the U.S.S. Cole during Barack Obama campaign conference call, Kerry said, "well, we hadn't declared war," The Hill's Sam Youngman reports.

Asked if al Qaeda was a threat at the time, the 2004 Democratic presidential nominee said, "well yes, obviously they were a threat. But, fundamentally we were not at war at that point in time."

Kerry also called John McCain "out of step with history and facts."

So were we "basically at peace" on December 7, 1941 as well, Senator Kerry?  Jim Ogonowski has responded to John Kerry's comments in a press release.

"Either John Kerry is naïve or he is actually using this tragedy for political propaganda to capture more headlines for himself in this election cycle.

Does he know this was not the first attack on the very building taken down on September 11th?

Does he consider the bombings of our embassies in Tanzania and Kenya and on American troops on the U.S.S. Cole as being "basically at peace"?

On the morning of September 11, 2001, America and the world were reminded that evil in the hearts of only a few men can cause harm to many. Those attacks were not planned in a day. Islamic extremists had long before declared war on America and American interests.

While September 11th was a day of peace to John Kerry, for me it was the day I lost my brother. I think it would be very appropriate for John Kerry to apologize to the victims and the families of those lost on that day for his remarks."

 

Syndicate content