In a total perversion of John F. Kennedy's call to patriotism, Martha Irvine of the Associated Press has scolding rebuke to young Obama voters, telling them that a select few are looking at their "20-something peers sitting back and letting the president do the work for them." Ask not what Obama can do for you, Generation Y, ask what you can do for Obama.
For shame, young Obamanauts, you who were sent over the moon at the election of Barack Obama last November. Have you so quickly forgotten your call to service, your devotion and obedience to Hope and Change? Your Dear Leader is in trouble, and you are ignoring the promise you made to stop the rise of the oceans and the changing of the seasons, as well as your pledge to support the government requiring you to purchase health insurance or be fined hundreds of dollars.
But Ms. Irvine isn't just scolding the youth of America. She also boldly dares to suggest to the President that he could be doing more to reach out to his young followers, and helpfully quotes a political science professor at La Salle University who fondly and wistfully recalls the fall of 2008, when students harangued non-believers into attending rallies (she calls the practice "dorm-storming") and when they danced in the streets after the election. The lamenting of the elders fairly leaps off the page. If only The One would turn his benevolent and loving eye towards Youth once more, then the army of the idealistic that failed to change society in the '60's could see their fight won by the next generation.
And what of the consequences should the next generation fail? Irvine warns ominously that college graduates are about to encounter all of the real world problems they've been avoiding by not fully supporting Change to the best of their abilities. She seems to be suggesting that if the kids don't want to be homeless, sick, and living in six inches of seawater from global warming that it's time they go from being mere voters to "responsible citizen"(s).
Yes, apparently the idea of responsible citizenship now extends towards blindly supporting the person you voted for, which I don't recall being the case back when Dubya was in the White House. I guess it's just one of those funny things that happen when liberals return to power.
What Irvine and the others forget is that "Generation Y" didn't vote for Obama because they have blind devotion, they voted for him because he's cool. The cool factor doesn't go nearly as far when it comes to policy activism. Just look at the Tea Party movement. There's a lot of passion and dedication, but (it has to be said)there's a definite lack of hipster cool. If Irvine is lamenting the fact that the Glenn Beck crowd is turning out by the tens of thousands, while young supporters of the President are slacking, she may want to think about this: many in the Tea Party movement feel that Glenn Beck does a good job of speaking for them, while many young supporters of President Obama feel he does a good job of speaking to them. It's the difference between an activist mob and an adoring public.