| About Us | Contact | Donate | User Blogs | Login |
My Journey Through Conservatism
Since this is my first post on this site, I thought it would be appropriate to detail my experience with conservatism.
Before I could differentiate between Newt Gingrich and Bill Clinton, two driving forces in my life made me receptive to being conservative later. The first was being raised in a Catholic household. My parents weren't very political when I was little, but they were religious. Looking back on it, my faith precluded me from accepting the premises of the left. The other influence was my inherent dislike of politcal correctness. I remember being in 5th grade and my teacher held a debate on the question "Should we tear down a forest to build a mall?" I was the only one who rose above a sentimental love of animals and thought that building a mall would be great. The first political commentator that I really liked was John Stossel. He would be on 20/20 after TGIF (keep in mind I was 10 or 11 at this time). What he was saying matched what I felt about extremist enviromentalists and spending boondoggles.
I first really got into politcs during the 2000 election campaign. It was very interesting before election day and what happened after only further cemented my interested in the political game. By the age of 14, I was watching political shows and listening to talk radio. By this time, I actively identified as a conservative. This was of course the time in which Bush was actually popular and commentators spoke of such things as a "permanent majority". But throughout high school, being a conservative was generally rather fun.
In a rather ironic twist, at the very time that the Bush house of cards began to fall apart, I shipped off to one of the most liberal colleges in the country, American University in Washington DC. Hurricane Katrina struck on the very first day of classes my freshman year. I have lived out the entire time in which the Republican Party fell apart in the great liberal bastion of Washington DC. Despite our difficulties nationally, I have had a fine time being conservative in DC. I have interned at such conservative organizations as the Media Research Center and Townhall.com. I have had a great time attending conservative conferneces. Most of all, I got involved in the AU College Republicans. Now entering my senior year, I have been the Secretary for two years running. We have been extraodinarily successful. We created national headlines when we brought Karl Rove to campus and a bunch of leftists laid down in front of his car. I have had the honor of interviewing Edwin Feulner, Sam Brownback, and Jonah Goldberg for our CR newsletter. I have had a great time despite all the doom and gloom nationally.
I began questioning much of the prevailing wisdom in conservatism by 2006. At that point I realized that criticizing the administrations war conduct was not "liberal", it was necessary to victory. I shouldn't have been surprised that we lost in 2006. When the AUCRs volunteered to help candidates in 2006, everyone we helped lost. We did a trip to Philadelphia to help Rick Santorum, we knocked on doors in Northern Virginia for Geroge Allen, and we worked the polls on Election Day for Michael Steele in Prince Georges County, MD. It was the worst political day of my short life. I was at the Michael Steele "victory party" when I found out my representative, Melissa Hart, had lost when I didn't think she was being seriously contested. It was a shame to see a great candidate like Michael Steele being weighed down by the mistakes of the administration. I realized that something was amiss, and I don't think the problems have been solved yet.
I hope that in my blog I can help with the process of the conservative movement to once again connect with the American people. The damning data present in Josh Kahn's post doesn't necessarily surprise me. I have sensed that for a time that simply being more conservative won't solve the problem. I think that conservatism has gone from being a set of common sense solutions to too often being an "ideology", a fixed set of beliefs that can never be changed. I think this needs to change, and something like The Next Right seems to understand this.


Comments
Good post.
I think that conservatism has gone from being a set of common sense solutions to too often being an "ideology", a fixed set of beliefs that can never be changed.
Agreed.
Excellent post,
but I'm not so certain about the quoted statement being a bad thing. A person's (or a party's) positions on issues should flow from their basic guiding principles. In that vein, I see our common sense solutions as an expression of our conservative ideology, which teaches us that more government is generally the wrong answer.
Certain beliefs can be changed, but certain beliefs ought not be. Changing enough beliefs in the wrong ways doesn't change the ideology; it means the believer has adopted a different one.
As a conservative, how would you connect...
... with the American people again?
That is an interesting statement, one worthy of futher discourse. How would you suggest John McCain connect with the American people? Or better yet, how can John McCain connect with the American people better than Obama?
I think your point is correct, the Republican Party does need to connect with the American people again. So how can a conservative party empower the people?
ex animo
davidfarrar
How to connect with American people
That's a great concern you raise David. Honestly, I'm not sure that McCain can connect conservative principles with the American people. I think he himself as an individual can easily connect with the average American. It appears that John McCain can connect with the average American much easier than Barack Obama can. What I would have to say about John McCain is that I will vote for him and even volunteer for him come this fall. I do not think he is the solution for a new conservative majority. What I think he will do, whether win or lose, is that he will buy us time to reformulate our principles and make them palatable to the general public. It will allow us to "decontaminate" our brand (I know I shouldn't use the brand concept, but the analogy makes too much sense in this case) much as the British Conservatives have done in the past decade. And hopefully by 2012-2016, we will be able to find a knockout Presidential candidate and be able to take back both houses of Congress.
My concern is that for the
My concern is that for the most part the GOP is not connecting with the young. We can't succeed as the party of a bunch of aging white men.
This Will Pass In Time
The main reason is because of the Iraq War. It will end one day, like all wars do. Then the Republican Party will become competitive again among young people, just like after Vietnam.
I agree
But don't feel bad. The Republican Party isn't connecting with its own base.
I don't think anyone feels the Republican Party is the way to empowerment in an ever increasing hostile economy.
ex animo
davidfarrar
Do you consider yourself a Goldwater-Reagen Republican...
...or a "Progressive" Republican, a Rockefeller Republican?
ex animo
davidfarrar
Are you a Goldwater-Reagen Republican...
...or a "Progressive" Republican -- a Rockefeller Republican?
ex animo
davidfarrar