| About Us | Contact | Donate | User Blogs | Login |
The Big Ten Strategy: Wisconsin
Promoted and bumped. -Patrick
Wisconsin has been a state that has been a near tie in the past two Presidential elections. In 2000, Al Gore beat George W. Bush by the very slim margin of 5,708 votes, a difference of 0.22 percentage points. 2004 was a near replay of 2000, as John Kerry beat Bush by a similar margin of 11,384 votes, a 0.38 percentage point difference. Consiering these totals, it would be ludicrous for either McCain or Obama to assume Wisconsin will be in their pile.
What are McCain's keys to victory in Wisconsin? First, he has to minimize the damage that Obama could do in Milwaukee and Madison. In 2004, Bush came out of Milwaukee County with a 117,000 vote deficit. It is likely that McCain will run no better or no worse than Bush. With a declining population, Milwaukee can't turn out that many more new voters than other places in Wisconsin.
The same is not true in Dane County. Dane County is home to Madison and its surroundings. Home of the University of Wisonsin and the state capitol, Madison has become one of the premier liberal bastions in America. Obama has shown his greatest strength in university towns and state capitals. Madison is both of these things and could be one of Obama's best locations in the country. More troubling for Republicans, Madison is one of the few left-wing hotbeds that is gaining in population. It's population has grown by 7 percent in the first 6 years of this decade. 2004 represented a huge step forward in turnout in Madison, as Kerry racked up a 90,000+ vote margin, nearly as much as Milwaukee. It will be hard to have the same type of turnout boost, but above average population growth makes a turnout surge possible.
The Republican sweet spot is in the Milwaukee suburbs. Milwaukee has some of the most Republican suburbs in the nation. The keystone of the suburban counties is Waukesha County. Bush won Waukesha by over 35 points, representing a margin of 81,300 votes. This in itself makes up a large part of the above two counties Democratic margins. Other suburban counties like Washington County and Ozaukee County gave similar percentages to Bush. These counties are enough to make up for Milwaukee.
A Republican success story in recent years has been the success in the eastern part of the state north of Milwaukee. Industrial towns like Racine, Sheboygan, and Green Bay have been trending Republican. Brown County, home of Green Bay, has seen a solid working class locale go for Republicans in increasing numbers. Bush won Brown county by 10 points, or 12,000 some votes. Similar percentages are found throughout the rest of the eastern counties.
When you add Wisconsin's mostly Republican rural population to the totals, it would appear Wisconsin should be a Republican state. So why have Democrats won the state for the past twenty years? Because of the Republican deficit in Mississippi River towns. For example, La Crosse County, the largest of these counties, had Kerry win by 8 points. The second largest county, Eau Claire County, had Kerry win by ten points. Viewed individually, these counties aren't gamechangers. But when you factor in roughly 10-12 counties in Western Wisonsin that voted this way, that creates a decent sized hole for Republicans. These are generally blue-collar communities that may not go for Obama's upper class liberalism, but have not bought into what Republicans have been selling in recent years. If McCain is to win in November, he has to reverse the margins in these counties. This area tends to be overlooked, but it needs to be his first priority in the state.


Comments
Quick correction
Racine is south of Milwaukee, and while it does trend Republican some years, it is probably best to call the place "bi-polar." In the past few races involving the local State Senate seat, it has gone GOP-Dem-GOP-Dem.
Me thinks you were meaning "Manitowoc," as a town north of Milwaukee which is tending more Republican over the past few elections.
The rest of your analysis is dead on though. Dane Co. has as a whole, around a sub-4% unemployment rate, which explains its growth. The local bio-tech industry is flourishing there.
I broke down the numbers myself
There was a huge difference in 2004 between the 10 county Milwaukee media market and the rest of the state. http://uselectionatlas.org/RESULTS/
Bush carried SE WI by a 622,000 to 578,000 vote-a 44,000 edge. Which is all the more remarkable because Kerry won the center city Milwaukee 4th District by 220,000 to 94,000 votes....hence Bush narrowly carried close-in suburban Milwaukee county.
Adding the other 9 counties in and Bush won suburban/exurban/small city SE WI by 528,000 to 358,000....a nearly 20 point spread, losing narrowly only in Kenosha.
This edge wasn't enough to offset losing Dane County by 90,000, since rural/small town outstate WI only generated about a 36,000 vote edge for Bush out of nearly 1.5M cast.
Bush ran reasonably well in the NE WI districts (6th and 8th; Green Bay, Appleton, Oshkosh) but as noted before, ran weakly in the LaCrosse- Eau Claire media market. (3rd District and part of the 7th District). This may be entirely coincidental, but Kerry seems to have tended to run better in protestant areas of rural WI than catholic areas. http://www.valpo.edu/geomet/geo/courses/geo200/religion.html
Two other places stand out.
Kerry won 58% in Rock County, south of Madison, and this was good for a 15,000 edge.
And in the four extreme northern counties reliant on TV from Duluth, MN, Kerry won by a 28,000 to 15,000 margin. (Maybe ought to run ads in this ADI, eh?)
So Dane County and the 4th District, which comprise less than 1/4 of the state were good for a 216,000 vote edge for Kerry. That's a big hole to big out of, which means no other holes can be dealt with and still win this state.
This hole will be harder to close because of WI's ultrapermissive election day registration laws, which are easily exploited by those intending the stuff the ballot box. Since we failed to elect a Republican Governor here in '06, they are still on the books
Rock County has branch of Madison University
Rock County has a branch of Madison University and has the Beloit College. It also has one of the oldest General Motors Plants in Janesville that rumor is will be shut down. With it sharing a border with IL it will be hard for the GOP to win.
Something else about WI is they have same day registration. My niece's boyfriend went with her when she was voting and they tried to get her boyfriend to vote too. He didn't have any id and they offered to allow my niece to "vouch" for him. They didn't even ask if he was old enough or lived in the same precinct. During the 2004 election; a bunch of punks slashed the tires of the vans that were rented for the GOP get out to vote effort in Milwaukee. [One of the punk's mother won her Democrat seat that day] Another Democrat politician voted in both IL and WI.
I can literally see Beloit, WI out my living room window. I know they have an illegal immigration problem. Yet, that is the type of voting that goes on in that state.
Times have changed, and today
Times have changed, and today Bush would lose that 2004 election by double digits.
Do not bet the kid's college fund on McCain here.
College towns
Part of Democratic success in Western Wisconsin will be due to multiple college towns, the kinds of places Obama polls well. La Crosse and Eau Claire were harmful to local 2006 GOP races because there was tremendous liberal turnout to oppose the gay marriage amendment.
This ballot question was a crusher....
59% for traditional marriage.....http://www.cnn.com/ELECTION/2006/pages/results/states/WI/I/01/
Guess that there are well over one million "divisive" and "discriminatory" voters in WI, plenty of whom must be Democrats since the question won in Milwaukee 55-45%
The question polled 56% in Rock County, and 60% or so up in the far north, BTW. The "yes" vote was 52% in Eau Claire and just 50% in La Crosse. Which sorta surprises me butthen again I'm from the East Coast.
Dane County voted like it was in Berkeley---67% "no". .70K Yes, 140K No, ..it sticks out like a sore thumb on the map ...outside Dane County the trad marriage side had a 470,000 vote edge (62%)
Seats were lost
A few marginal GOP state senate seats were lost in those college towns. That gave the State Senate to the Democrats.
Given the marriage issue was a wash in Eau Claire & LaCrosse
was there some other reason an incumbent who had previously won in this district would lose support?
Plus, with "Bush" on the ballot how many of these voters were casting an anti-Iraq vote and would have shown up anyway.
Finally, were there marginal Republican incumbents elsewhere that held their seats because social conservatives came to the polls?
Don't forget the marriage ammendment passed
The marriage ammendment got conservatives out to vote, too. I wrote letters to the editor and blogged very boistreously about my opinion on the subject. They told me that since I lived in IL, I should mind my own business. I told them that since I had children and grandchildren living in the state; it was my business. The marriage amendment passed.
The marriage amendment tracked the presidential vote
in the college towns and the Milwaukee suburbs.
In Milwaukee County, the smaller urban areas and the rural counties traditional marriage was much more popular than Bush was
Let's be honest
Wisconsin don't matter. Michigan Michigan MIchigan!!!!!!
Granholm, Kilpatrick and they like McCain. Racism runs rampant in this state and for good reason. Working class whites ere kicked out of detroit. Racist mayors have stolen from them for years andnow its payback. Middle class whites in Michigan have seen liberalism on display and dont like i.
THE MAYOR OF DETROIT GOT BOOED AT A RED WINGS PARADE.