More About Rush

Crossposted at Right Minds

In my last post, I wrote about Rush Limbaugh’s role in the Republican party. I said that while Rush makes a very good spokesman for the conservative movement, leadership of the GOP is best left to politicians. Rush should play a William F. Buckley role—lead the movement, not the party.

Given some of the sentiments expressed around the conservative blogosphere on the topic, that isn’t good enough for many conservative pundits. They think that Limbaugh’s brand of conservatism is outdated—angry, exclusive, backwards-looking, and tinged with racism. In this view, Rush Limbaugh, while he may have his uses, should stay well away from any leadership position.

There is, perhaps, some merit to that viewpoint. But those who agree with forget one thing. If Rush Limbaugh speaks for the conservative movement, there is a reason that is so. His ideas resonate with millions of people, and those people are willing to invest time and social capital into listening to him.

So if we assume that Limbaugh makes a poor conservative spokesman, the fault lies with all those millions of conservatives who support him. There are so many conservative leaders who seem to assume that Limbaugh’s ideas weakens the movement. Instead, I think the opposite is true—Limbaugh’s ideas are the movement, in that without the glue his show provides, conservatism would be an abstraction, not a living political faction. (Granted, had Rush never existed, conservatism wouldn’t have withered and died—someone would have picked up the slack, though probably not so well).

So if reformer conservatives don’t like Rush, there’s an easy answer—set up your own alternative. Those right-wingers who point out that Limbaugh can attract maybe thirty percent of voters and scare away the rest miss the fact that their ideas are only popular with a tiny population of political junkies who comment on their websites. David Frum thinks Rush’s popularity doesn’t extend much beyond his twenty million strong audience. But Frum’s popularity doesn’t extend much beyond his relatively small group of Internet fans. Maybe Frum’s (and others; Frum is just a convenient example) ideas are really good and will be a fresh start for the GOP and the conservative movement. But so far, new conservatism has been long on ideas and short (inevitably, given its newness) on results. If Limbaugh is outdated, he has had success. Those who attempt to tear him down don’t seem to have anything to put in his place.

0
Your rating: None

Comments

PROFESSOR RUSH: DOCTOR OF DEMOCRACY

 I live in Toronto but must listen to Rush on a Buffalo radio station as i have for about 12 years. We grow liberals on trees in Toronto. In the car or truck that station cannot be heard in the east end of Toronto or very far north, so many who need to hear Rush teach about liberalism, cannot listen. Many liberals quote the talking points about Rush but when i hear them, i know they did not listen to him, only to the lies about what he is alleged to have said. That is how to spot a liberal lying when they pretend to quote Rush but only spread the Dem lies that he did not say. Professor Rush is a breath of fresh air, in a world gone crazy, like much of Europe which loves socialism. The cost of living is so high in Europe, that a can of soda is $2 in the corner store in England.  Gasoline was over $7 per U.S. gallon in the most expensive countries in Europe back in 1998, because of socialism, taxes and big government. 

How do you think they prop up this phoney brand of commie lifestyle? Very soon, Americans are going to be paying the cost of propping up wasteful job creation programs and more government than you can imagine.  With your new budget, the USA is now more socialist than Canada ever could be or was. Your new name is going to be the Socialist States of America. Better get ready to vote out the Democrats in 2010 or else your kids and grand kids will also want to leave. Come to Canada, pay less taxes. We get a 60 percent tax deduction for charities and get to keep all the profits tax free when we sell our primary homes.. Did i mention basically free health care?? Sorry our drugs cost so little. We don't allow the drug companies to donate to political causes over $1,000.  Now you see the big picture.

  

so glad you enjoy suckling at the teat of hatred.

i don't need to quote Limbaugh... i can quote the people who made limbaugh, and they're far smarter.

what you said

Perhaps there isn't an alternative, but there's going to have to be at some point.  I don't wish to deny Rush a seat at the table.  But the leader, or the main voice, or, worse than that, someone who dictates the actions of others in the party or goes around demanding apologies for real or imaginary slights is a role I don't think he'll be able to play, or should play, at that!  I'm going to try to write about this myself and I will try to be as magnanimous as possible.  But I really don't think this is good for the party.