| About Us | Contact | Donate | User Blogs | Login |
What's Next for Palin?
Crossposted at Right Minds
So, with the presidential election over, Barack Obama will become President of the United States, Joe Biden will become Vice President, and John McCain will serve out the rest of his time in the U.S. Senate. Sarah Palin’s fate is less certain—she has an interesting political future ahead of her.
Her situation at present is not without precedent. On one side of the ideological fence, Palin is nigh-universally loved and respected. Over eighty percent of Republicans have a favorable view of Palin, and she seems to be the Republican frontrunner for 2012. She is viewed, at present, as Miss Conservative; a perfect model of conservative thought.
To the other half of the country, she’s a punch line. She’s seen as frighteningly extremist; as well as laughably unqualified. An entire Palin mythology has sprang up among Democrats—she didn’t know that Africa is a continent (is that even possible for a governor?), she was unaware of which countries are in NAFTA, she “went rogue” and started going after William Ayers without campaign permission. She is a sort of Democrat bogeyman, a terrifying “what if” to frighten the base.
Sound like anyone we know? Yes, Sarah Palin occupies the exact position once occupied by Hillary Clinton, except the parties are reversed. And we all know how the Hillary saga turned out. She came very close to winning the White House—had it not been for an unexpected, smooth-talking Illinois Senator, Hillary Clinton would probably have beaten McCain and become our first female president.
Palin could do nearly the same thing, except she could actually win her party’s nomination. The Republican party tends to embrace the next person in line as its nominee (the last time they didn’t was in 1964, with Barry Goldwater), and Palin is the next in line. And Palin is probably the politician most identified with the Republican party, which would have to be an advantage in getting the nomination.
Palin’s other advantages are pretty obvious. She is (at times) articulate and compelling. She has a sky-high approval rating as governor of Alaska. And she is, of course, attractive and has a wonderful family, and seems to embody the American Dream.
Further, there really aren’t that many strong Republican candidates on the horizon. Mike Huckabee is far more articulate and funny than Palin, but he lacks support from the conservative base. Mitt Romney has money, but no charisma or ability to connect with voters. Bobby Jindal is smart and conservative, but little known (though that could change before 2012).
On the other hand, Palin has some tough obstacles to overcome as well. Over half the nations thinks she’s stupid, which is a bit of a problem when running for president. And her situation in Alaska might not be as secure as it looks—being an oil producing state, Alaska depends on $74 dollar a barrel oil to balance its budget. Oil’s at $60 right now. And as Hillary Clinton proved, highly polarizing candidates don’t always play well with voters.
Palin has a lot of room to succeed—and a lot of room to fail. She will have to eradicate the impression that she is unintelligent, which will be quite hard—Gerald Ford was perhaps the most athletic president ever, but one trip and fall gave him an unshakeable reputation as someone exceptionally clumsy. But hard or not, Palin must succeed.
Palin has one more weapon that could help her do so. America voted Barack Obama into the White House because he promised “change” (tempered, of course, by “hope”). Palin represents much the same attraction—she bills herself as an original, outside-the-Beltway thinker. That isn’t a qualification for the presidency, or any other office, but if the word “change” could make Barack Obama the most powerful man in the world, then it is not inconceivable that “outside-the-Beltway” could do much the same for Palin. Palin’s attractive and inexperienced, but don’t underestimate her—she managed to go from mayor of Wasilla to three and a half million votes and a heartbeat away from the presidency in less than ten years.


Comments
Palins not it, at least not now.
I believe that like it or not, too many people are out on Sarah Palin. Largely media driven, there are a lot of people that just dislike her. I have talked to smart rational republicans that have even spouted some of the smears against her. It blows my mind the way she has been treated.
Either way i think she is just to devisive right now. She should go back to being somewhat under the radar for the next few years, then re-examine things. Peolple seem to nearly universally discredit her status as acting governor which i dont understand, but the only way to change that view...is through experience.
Yeah...
She should go back to being somewhat under the radar for the next few years, then re-examine things.
I can see how she can help her chances by hiding in a corner and acting like a recluse as if she has something to be ashamed of. That's not how Hillary did it and I think that Daniel makes a key comparison.
She will have to raise her game
In a huge way, and not just to win her party's nomination. I have a particular take on this, which is based on the last ten years (and the next four).
Part of her appeal is also her achilles heel -- that downhome, common-sense, plain-speaking personality.
Back in 2000, when Dubya showed up, the country was on the tail-end of an economic boom (bubble didn't really hit until 2001). Remember one of the issues of the day? Bringing respectability back to the Oval Office. (What a great problem to have, in retrospect.) So on the heels of everyone being offended by Clinton's transgressions while in office, we (the aggregate) were comfortable with a guy who spoke a little more plain. He was "someone we could have a beer with."
Flash forward to 2008: economic holocaust, Katrina, Iraq, etc. Lots of things that make the incumbent administration look clueless. And, correspondingly, Dubya's numbers goes down, down, down. Now, with people wondering if they're going to lose their house, their job, their life-savings, the need for someone a little more serious than a beer-drinking buddy became much more pressing.
Flash ahead to 2012: what environment will we find ourselves in? If we're back on track, and people feel safe in their homes and jobs, the chances of Obama being defeated in re-election are low. If we're still spinning our wheels, then there's a chance for the Party of Lincoln.
But that's only an opening if things are bad. In a similar environment this election, Obama ran roughshod around McCain because he could speak to the issues of the day. McCain tried to recall echoes of time past but offered little in the way of details, and that was a bad signal to send to people looking for some real answers.
If Palin is to step in next election cycle and have a chance, she is really going to have to step up her game. She will have to be more than "someone we can have a beer with." She'll have to be able to go toe-to-toe with Obama in speaking to issues, and that is not her strength today.
She needs a serious makeover
There is absolutely no way Palin would stand a chance against Obama the way she is right now. Can anyone honestly imagine her winning a debate against him? I liked her at first - in fact I grew up in Wasilla when she was mayor - but she disqualified herself in the couric interviews. She tripped over basic questions, regardless of the bias, regardless if she's smart or not, that just isn't presidential. In a world of complex financial, foreign, and social issues with an ever-growing world population, it's appropriate to expect the leader of the most powerful nation to have immense depth of knowledge. She fails to project a sense of seriousness that most people want in a president, and add the beauty queen image on top and it's worse.
Is it possible she could undergo an immense transformation in 4 years? Maybe, but I doubt it. Putting her out on the national stage so early did a lot of damage to the GOP's image and that risk shouldn't be taken again so recklessly.
Look
If you saw the Greta interview last night, she'll be fine. She did an excellent job. The fact is that if things go bad in 2012, any Republican can win if she can address the issues before us.
I remember Reagan in 1976
He was an actor! A cowboy! He'll get us all killed with that confrontational talk about the USSR.
After four years of Jimmy Carter, he looked like a genious and our only hope.
The rest as they say, is history. I wouldn't worry about what "half the country" thinks about Palin right now. She has a few years to soften her image and sharpen he credibility. After four years of Obabma, she may look a lot better to her current critics.
Palin = Clinton is a false parallel
Number one, Hillary is knowledgable, Palin is not. The "mythology" you refer to is coming from directly inside the McCain campaign and it's not been refuted except for Palin calling them "jerks" and "cowards" (on that she is right). She is woefully ignorant of world affairs. This celebration of ignorance and mediocrity must stop.
But, she's "gonna plow through that door" in 2012 and for that I wish her godspeed.
Hillary had huge gaffes early on
From "I didn't sit home and bake cookies you know" to "Mahatma Ghandi used to run a gas station in Missouri" to "the vast right wing conspiracy", everything that has ever flowed out of HRC's mouth hasn't been exactly gaffe free.
Add in her moral (Whitewater) and ethical (attacking the women Bill attacked) shortcomings, you really make the point that Palin starts way ahead of HRC.
Woefully ignorant of foriegn affairs? I saw the debate agaist the highly seasoned, experienced and polished Joe Biden, and she battled him to a draw. On foriegn policy. You've got to be kidding
Keep telling yourself that she's a foreign policy expert
I'm praying that there are a lot who believe just as you do. Literally. Also.
Keep telling yourself she's woefully uninformed
Misunderestimated.
Palin created that image
The idea of Palin being uninformed came directly out of her mouth, not her critics.
McCain's numbers started tanking as soon as the Couric interview went public and people recoiled at the notion of someone so unprepared being so close to the Presidency.
A few days later, the markets crashed and gave the Palin apologists an alibi.
Palin has a long road ahead to repair her image, but it can only start when she starts speaking intelligently. Calling her critics "stinkers" does not count as intelligent.
Stinkers!!!!
Your right. I'm not tolerating that kind of foul mouthed disrespect from any candidate!
I bet she calls her kids "stinkers" when they misbehave. I think the rough and tumble world of politics must have gotten to her and she just snapped.
if she wants to be taken seriously
She needs to speak to Americans like adults, not 6-year-olds.
Maybe the mayor of Wasilla can get away with that, but it's not going to go over well with the general electorate.
Oh
Sorry Ray. I thought she was Governor of Alaska and a former candidate for Vice President of the United States.
I didn't realize she never made it past Mayor of Wasilla. Thanks for corrrecting me.
you misunderstand
I'll rephrase:
Maybe that kind of banal chatter could pass muster for the mayor of a small town like Wasilla, but it will never work on a national stage. To wit:
"My fellow Americans, we have decided to impose a gosh darn trade embargo on Russia because that Putin fellow is just being such a stinker, ya know?"
There are maybe 20 cities with a higher population than Alaska and Palin crashed horribly during her brief stint as a VP candidate, so she has yet to pass any sort of broad political test.
You need to take another look
Seriously. You need to let go of this Wasilla crap. At least admit that she's got an 80% approval rating as Governor of Alaska! And a 91% favorable rating among the GOP.
I am not saying she is the future of the party. But she has shown what happens when you stick to conservative principals rather than a mealy mouth, middle of the road, flavor of the month message. Any agreement there my freind?
I don't think Palin's
I don't think Palin's adherence to conservative principles is the issue. It's the perception of competency or lack thereof. It makes no difference if 91% of the GOP likes her if the majority of the general electorate thinks she is unqualified for the office she is seeking.
That is currently the #1 roadblock to any Palin candidacy on a national level, no matter how well-loved she is by her supporters.
With regards to the "Wasilla crap", it's only in response to the constant drumbeat that she had the most "executive experience" of any candidate on either ticket.
Right
The only resonse is to belittle her record. Go backward on the resume until it looks light.
Ridiculous thought process
Good luck to you.
my point has nothing to do with her record
It's the way she presents herself. If you want to turn it into a red herring about her record, go ahead.
But if she had presented herself as knowledgeable and competent, then McCain would have probably beaten Obama.
I only brought up the "mayor of Wasilla" point as an example of a more localized office where someone could get away with that kind of behavior.
From Camille Paglia . . .
She states it much better than I . . .
"I like Sarah Palin, and I've heartily enjoyed her arrival on the national stage. As a career classroom teacher, I can see how smart she is -- and quite frankly, I think the people who don't see it are the stupid ones, wrapped in the fuzzy mummy-gauze of their own worn-out partisan dogma. So she doesn't speak the King's English -- big whoop! There is a powerful clarity of consciousness in her eyes. She uses language with the jumps, breaks and rippling momentum of a be-bop saxophonist. I stand on what I said (as a staunch pro-choice advocate) in my last two columns -- that Palin as a pro-life wife, mother and ambitious professional represents the next big shift in feminism. Pro-life women will save feminism by expanding it, particularly into the more traditional Third World"
But you are right. She talks funny. So lets disqualify her.