A Missed Video Opportunity

Good points. Then again, we're Republicans, so we obey the rules. But did we do so to a fault in this case? -Patrick

Much ado has been made about the House Republican protest against Democrats for adjourning without a vote on energy policy, and with good reason. It is both a politically momeentous occasion and a technological one.

But thus far, this public relations battle has been a missed video opportunity for the GOP. Someone needs to be capturing this event on film for posterity.

Yes, there are good reasons why that hasn't happened. In a display of cowardice designed to save her party from embarrassment, House Speaker Nancy Pelosi, D-Calif., ordered the cameras in the House chamber turned off, and C-SPAN dutifully and complied. Unfortunately, C-SPAN has a monopoly on congressional floor coverage. Cameras are banned on the floor and in the press and public galleries.

But if Republicans want to make the most of this confrontation with a recalcitrant majority, they need to find a way to film it. The on-site Twitter coverage has been great, but online video is far more powerful. There's a big difference between reading the words "Crowd chants 'USA! USA!' and 'Drill now!'" and actually seeing that enthusiasm as it happens.

If this truly is "the Boston Tea Party of 2008," as Arizona Republican John Shadegg said on Twitter, then someone needs to start dumping some tea.

Lawmakers already have shown a willingness to challenge outdated House rules that fail to recognize the realities of communication in the information age. Why not challenge the rules against video from the floor?

Someone obviously already did so with a cell-phone camera, but the grainy, choppy footage was merely symbolic, not substantive. Americans deserve to see and hear more.

C-SPAN can't buck Pelosi's orders and stay in business, but would she risk challenging a fellow House member who taped a debate, or at least one side of it, that Americans are entitled to hear? To do so would be an even greater PR disaster for Democrats.

Rep. John Culberson, R-Texas, or some other high-tech revolutionary should take a videocamera onto the floor and show the tape that C-SPAN can't. And if Republicans don't want to go that far in testing the House rules, then have the debate somewhere other than the House chamber. Move the proceedings outside the Capitol building for everyone to see.

If Republicans continue the protest, the liberal media will keep ridiculing it and burying the news. But the Internet makes it possible to bypass the media and have the energy debate neither the liberals in Congress nor the liberal media want America to hear.

Put it all on Eyeblast.tv. We'll help spread the word.

0
Your rating: None

Comments

QIK is where I found John Culberson's uploads

I searched for more within the same time frame, but this was what I found:

here, here and here

Fox News tried to cover this on Fox & Friends this morning and on America's Election HQ last night, but their video completely sucked compared to Congressman Culberson's.  It's awesome to see the American citizens passing by just line the chamber while the GOP has its finest moment in ages. 

I just Tweeted Culberson and taxreformer to upload their videos

to Eyeblast.tv.  Here's the link to taxreformer's videos of the GOP Revolt on YouTube!

 

Get that footage on Eyeblast, too

I actually saw your videos. I subscribe to the "taxreformer" channel on YouTube. But I'm talking about getting video of the actual debate -- the cheering, etc.

Having other people describe it in interviews or write about it is a milestone in the sense that the mainstream media isn't covering the story, so at least we're getting the story out in some way. But live, on-the-scene coverage is what's really missing.

By the way, you need to start uploading your videos to Eyeblast. You guys have an account but haven't used it yet. If we had your videos over the weekend, we would have been promoting them on our front page. YouTube won't do that for you.

Absolutely agreed!

And if I were in D.C. instead of San Diego going to my day job tomorrow, I'd be all over that.  I just tweeted the following request to the Rock the House group on Twitter:  lagomorph13 #dontgo Please upload your videos tomorrow to Eyeblast.tv at http://tinyurl.com/5s9ony, and the admins will post them on the Front Page!

I also posted the same request on Facebook at Let's Rock The House! 

Thanks so much for the great promo opportunity Danny.  I'm not familiar with our account info, will check with the NxR admins about whether we can make it public for our site viewers. 

Now I'm a-gunna have to git me one-a them funny li'l i-Phones.  I heard they only worked with AT&T as the provider, and I've got a 2 year contract with Verizon - then I heard there was a hack that could be done to use my existing provider.  I'll have to check it out - the iPhone video quality is surprisingly good.

My mistake

I thought you were "taxreformer," which has an account at Eyeblast and hasn't used it yet. We definitely want their videos and will promote them, so thanks for the tweet on our behalf. :)))

LoL! Now you have to post the Rock the House! Videos in Page 1

hehehe....now You is Owned!!  <weg>

Why Not Ask Volunteers in DC to Video the House Republicans?

Why not ask anyone willing, in the DC area to get over to the House as fast as they can to video the proceedings?

Ask for Independents, if you want to protect Republicans.  I don't think it's illegal to bring a video camera in, is it?  Good footage may even get the interest of major news networks.  Boy, you'd think that political paparazzi would be stampeding. Especially since the Speaker of the House is trying to violate our right to freedom of information AND freedom of the press to report the news.

 

Camera use on Capitol Hill

Actually, there are restrictions on when and how the public can use still and video cameras on Capitol Hill. Those rules need to be updated to reflect the realities of the new media era.

What I'm suggesting is that if anyone is in a position to force a change, it's members of Congress. They have the access and the authority. Some of them already are challenging outdated "franking" rules that technically prohibit the use of Twitter and other tools on congressional Web sites. They could do the same with video.

And if House Republicans don't want to be that revolutionary, they could still take the debate liberals don't want to have somewhere other than the House floor to make their point in a way that the story can be told in video.