Pastor Vindicated On Disorderly Charge, Given A Guilty Verdict For Obstruction‏

Pastor Vindicated On Disorderly Charge, Given A Guilty Verdict For Obstruction‏ - By: Debra J.M. Smith - www.InformingChristians.com

 

First Pastor Dave was wrongly arrested and charged with "Disorderly Conduct" for having addressed to teenagers in a parking lot, as part of his ministry. Then he was wrongly arrested and charged with "Resisting" the first arrest. Later the district attorney changed the second charge from "Resisting" to "Obstruction." This is the short version. At one point in the case, the district attorney offered to drop the obstruction charge if Pastor Dave would have pleaded guilty to the disorderly conduct charge. That did not fly, as Pastor Dave was not about to plead guilty to such a horrendous charge.  So, what did the district attorney do? Well, within a week of the trial she flipped it around. She dropped the disorderly conduct charge and went with the obstruction charge. I guess they get to pick and choose these things like candy in a candy store. And we wonder why so many people do not agree with the judicial system in this country.  The district attorney obviously realized that in the United States of America, speaking to two teen boys did not constitute disorderly conduct. She admitted, in so many words, on April 27, 2009 during Pastor Dave's trial in her opening statement that he had not done anything wrong towards the teens.  The obstruction trial, that in essence, turned out to be Pastor Dave on trial for his own arrest, came down to his word against three cops. Who do you think won? Keeping in mind the theatrics that can go on in such a trial, I don't think it is hard to figure out the answer to that question. But the good news is, Pastor Dave was vindicated of doing anything wrong towards the two teenagers. Clearly the district attorney new she could not get the jury to believe that one!    For the full story, go to: http://www.debrajmsmith.com/pastordave.html

 

3.666665
Your rating: None Average: 3.7 (3 votes)

Comments

I guess you don't watch "Law and Order"

So, what did the district attorney do? Well, within a week of the trial she flipped it around. She dropped the disorderly conduct charge and went with the obstruction charge. I guess they get to pick and choose these things like candy in a candy store. And we wonder why so many people do not agree with the judicial system in this country.

Debs, I guess you don't watch "Law and Order" - becasue yes, deciding who gets charged with what is what DAs do. How else would you like the system to work - the perp decides what he gets charged with?

I have no idea why you think this matter should be posted here, but I was curious enough to Google it. You failed to mention that the perp asked for and got a jury trial - which rather casts the whole thing in a different light, don't you think? Unless it is your contention that the jury pool in Beloit, Wisconsin is, like MSNBC, full of heathens.

Well, "Nands" - Do you not know how a jury can be played...

Normal
0

Normal
0

Well, "Nands" - Do you not know how a jury can be played when the judge is an ex-prosecutor? What? Did you miss that episode of “Law & Order?”

Unlike you, I have great faith in the ability of 12 citizens of

Unlike you, I have great faith in the ability of 12 citizens of Beloit, WI to figure out what is what. Also, unlike you, I don't assume that just because someone calls themselves "Pastor X", they are above reproach. Pastor Ted Haggard, anyone?

Well, "Nands," if Law & Order...

Well, "Nands," if Law & Order presents it that way, then it must be true.

An important posting.

Abuse of power, especially by law enforcement and judicial authority, hits at the heart of the Bill of Rights.