| About Us | Contact | Donate | User Blogs | Login |
Rebuilding the Right: Why Abortion Still Matters
In the aftermath of the 2008 election, I noticed a great deal of argument within the Republican Party and the conservative mocement as to whom within our ranks we should hold responsible for our defeat. Specifically, there has been an ongoing war of ideas between conservatives who emphasize economic issues, and conservatives who emphasize social issues, with many in the former category saying that conservatisim and Republicanism should shed their social and cultural ideas and stick to the economy, and those in the latter who insist upon the primacy of social matters. I would say that we don't have to emphasize one at the expense of the other, but I feel I must says this: discard social values at your own peril.
Easily the most visible social issue of our time is that of abortion. We are at a point in this nation where the Sarah Palins and Rick Santorums of the world are denigrated as backwards ignoramuses and neanderthals, as people unable to see the light of the progressive march of history towards its teleological whiggish conclusion. This is criticism we are accustomed to from the left, who insist that abortion must be legal regardless of societal consequences. The criticism they take from the right, however, the criticism that we need to deemphasize the abortion issue and focus on our anti-tax, pro-business agenda, is ill-advised. This is because the notion of a Right to Life is the fundamental to basis of what conservatives believe in.
The idea of a Right to Life constitutes the very fabric of conservative ideology, the belief in the value of the individual. The economic ideas generally associated with the conservative movement, low-taxes, limited government, and personal responsibility, are all based on the principle of individual rights. The most basic and most seminal of these individual liberties is the liberty to Live. As conservatives, we believe in the intrinsic and unique value of the life of every man, woman and child on God's green earth, and that they have liberties that can never be compimised. If we as conservatives cannot respect this most basic and fundamental of individual liberties, then we have given ourselves no real reason to respect any others.
If the Republican Party wishes to return to the American political scene as a voice for conservative ideas, it cannot simply brush aside the abortion issue as some are willing to do. Republicans should embrace this issue, not run away from it. In some states, Republicans will have to carry minority votes, and there are strong contingents within immigrant communities, particularly those from Latin America and East Asia, that place a great importance on family values. Furthermore, this is an issue that allows the party to reach out to the youth vote. As a college student myself, I know that the pro-life movement has a very strong youth element to it. If Republicans and conservatives don't want to abandon this generation to the wolves of rampant social democracy, then they need to reach out more to these groups, and bring them fully on board with the conservative movement.
Embracing social issues does not, however, mean that the Republicans must become the party of Mike Huckabee, a party whose sole appeal is to social conservatives, with perhaps some talk of tax-cutting thrown in. We can stick to our economic conservative values, promote limited government, and stand on moral principles as well. If we abandon one of our key principles, then we may as well abandon them all.
- Eric Ames's blog
- Login or register to post comments


Comments
I think you're missing the point
No one is telling you to abandon your moral principles, but as Tom Coburn said: "The greatest moral issue of our time isn’t abortion, it’s robbing our next generation of opportunity. You’re going to save a child from being aborted so they can be born into a debtor’s prison?” If we can elect pro-choice, fiscally responsible Republicans in more socially liberal regions, we should. They would be better than most Democrats in the same regions.
pro-choice usually means big government
I agree with the sentiments. Indeed, the right to life cause would be better served by more pro-choice Republicans who would vote for good judges. But as a practical matter, it is very hard to find pro-choice Republicans who are fiscally responsible. The few who are usually come from socially conservative states like Texas (Kay Hutchinson, Lamar Smith) or Georgia (the late Paul Coverdell). Note that the three Republicans who voted for the spendulus bill are all pro-choicers from the northeast. I believe Hutchinson was the only pro-choice Republican senator to vote against it. I haven't checked it out, but I'll bet that most of the Democrats who voted against it in the House are pro-life. Politicians who are willing to stand up for the rights of the unborn are usually willing to stand up for economic rights as well. Those who can accept arguments why the unborn shouldn't be protected also tend to be pretty willing to accept arguments for other encroachments on individual liberty.
I don't know whether that's a hard and fast rule.
Remember, Harry Reid is pro-life, and Barry Goldwater was pro-choice (like Hutchison, he often voted to limit abortions, but was pro-choice for early abortions and fought to get the Pro-life plank removed from the 1992 GOP platform).
good rule of thumb
There are certainly plenty of exceptions, and there used to be a fair number of pro-life leftists in the House Democratic caucus. But my point is that there is a very strong correlation between fiscal and social conservatism, and most of the socially liberal Republicans who might be recruited to run in the Northeast are going to be pretty squishy on fiscal issues as well.
And I suspect that is because most of the voters who want a strong fiscal conservative to represent them also want someone who is pro-life, and most of those who are embarrassed by the GOP's pro-life stance are also embarrassed when the party takes tough stands on fiscal issues. Social and economic conservatism flow from the same basic assumptions about the individual, justice, natural law, etc.
The church is also rebuilding
The Christian Right has been faced with the emergent church ... http://matthew25.org/category/abortion/ ... I believe more people are waking up to the facts about this movement.
"One who turns away his ear from hearing the law, Even his prayer is an abomination." Proverbs 28:9
http://www.lamblion.us/2008/09/what-does-emergent-church-movement.html
All things said and done, Conservative Christians are Convservatives who want smaller Government and for Government to remain seperate from our freedoms, Govenments proper place is under God.
Keep it Simple Stupid
Murder is bad.
I wonder...
...about those pooper scooper laws.
Why, do you suppose, that the Left has not come out against this on the grounds that the mess that one's dog leaves behind is not a part of one's body?
And why is there this talk of "reproductive rights" when it can be shown that abortion is, in fact, an impediment to the reproductive process?