There is now no question

It's a given that no one wants war especially a religious one, and your insinuation that I or anyone who disagrees with BHO on  the big issues is disingenouous and insulting. (By the way, I guess it's OK now for us to add the "H" back in his name... at least for today, while he's in Cairo).

My belief that he's a One World Order president ( just the sound of that is frightening) is found primarily 1) in his opening remarks (after the thank you's to Cairo Univeristy), 2) a misunderstanding on his part of Muslim history that he made in the middle ( in order to endear himself to unfounded Muslim pride, I am sure) and 3) especially in his conclusion remarks about the Koran ( what he calls "the Holy Koran"), the Torah and the Bible, where he tries to forge a sort of one world Torah-Bibical-Koranic  statement... that's the really scary part.

1) Opening clues:(bolds are mine for emphasis and clues to his real intentions)

"I have come here to seek a new beginning between the United States and Muslims around the world; one based upon mutual interest and mutual respect; and one based upon the truth that America and Islam are not exclusive, and need not be in competition."

2) Middle misinterpretation and misunderstanding of history

"As a student of history, I also know civilization's debt to Islam. It was Islam – at places like al-Azhar University – that carried the light of learning through so many centuries, paving the way for Europe's Renaissance and Enlightenment"

Student of history? I don't know what history books he used at Harvard.I guess they skipped the chapters about the Moorish Invasion and  the Battle of Tours in the 8th Century. The only thing Muslims carried were swords during that "paving"-after the Battle of Tours they carried more than a sword... they carried all the European booty and gold they could  back home... and if there was any "enlightment" made to Europe, it was Europe's "enlightenment" of the monetary profits and gain that could be made as modeled by  the Muslim slave trade of Africans.(  I encourage anyone interested to read Islamic Imperialism, by  Professor Efriam Karsh of King's College, University of London) .

"Islam has a proud tradition of tolerance."

(Huh? Say what, Mr. President????

Tell that to the family of Daniel Pearl, Mr. President. Tell that to the families of those soldiers in Iraq whose naked bodies were dragged through the streets by the cheering crowds and were burned and then hung on bridges in Basra. Tell it to the families left fatherless and motherless because of 9/11, and afterward the  celebration througout the Muslim world over the henous act in New York on that terrible day.  

3) The conclusion of BHO's speech  is one big liberal quasi- religious- cum-bay-ya fest, where he suggests that with a little Holy Book cherry picking, we'll find the keys to happiness, peace and we'll get the big picture. Then and only then, in the words of Rodney King we can "all get along". This is BHO's most telling One Worldism... in fifth gear and in the fast lane:

"The Holy Koran tells u: "O mankind! We have created you male and a female; and we have made you into nations and tribes so that you may know one another."

( The Koran also says that those that "make war upon Allah and his messenger...will be killed or crucified, or have their hands and feet on alternate sides cut off..." (  The Koran, Surat al-Ma'idah 5:33)

The Talmud tells us: "The whole of the Torah is for the purpose of promoting peace."

The Holy Bible tells us: "Blessed are the peacemakers, for they shall be called sons of God."

"The people of the world can live together in peace. We know that is God's vision. Now, that must be our work here on Earth. Thank you. And may God's peace be upon you."

(and an 'assalamu alaykum' back at you, Barak!) 

While BHO can cherry pick various holy passages that sound simalarly nice (and there are some similarities in the three scriptures, recounting historical figures such as Abraham, Moses and Jesus) and he can ingratiate his hosts with words like "holy Koran" and "peace be upon you" and "blessed be there are acute differences in  practice, interpretation and worldview between  of Islam, Judaism and Christianity. A nice speech isn't going to change any of that, no matter how many times liberals want to hold hands and sing around the proverbial campfires of 'Yeah-but-it makes-me-feel-good'  tolerance.

BHO has done enough apologizing to the world (first in Europe, now Arabia- what's next North Korea?)for the country that elected him president. Until Islam cleans up it's own house with actions (not just words) will we see true progress toward peaceful co-existance.  

if it weren't for the Italians, there would be no Renaissance. I challenge you to read this link in its entirety.

...but your not really Italian, or you would know your history.

I've noticed you have a way of trying to support weak arguments with personal attacks.

Let's see...was  Byzantium and Constantinople Muslim? Nope.  Roman. Christian. Eastern Orthodox..(get it, Nando..."Constantinople....Constantine"?)  It was Christian until it was overrun by Ottoman Turks in 1453. 

 Your most truthful word in your posting is "via" and "preserved".  At the very most, they were keepers , not originators.