Flip-flops and Governance

Praise of Obama from an unlikely source - Karl Rove - on an unlikely topic: Obama's flip-flops:

http://online.wsj.com/article/SB124286200693341141.html

Barack Obama inherited a set of national-security policies that he rejected during the campaign but now embraces as president. This is a stunning and welcome about-face.

For example, President Obama kept George W. Bush's military tribunals for terror detainees after calling them an "enormous failure" and a "legal black hole." His campaign claimed last summer that "court systems . . . are capable of convicting terrorists." Upon entering office, he found out they aren't.

He insisted in an interview with NBC in 2007 that Congress mandate "consequences" for "a failure to meet various benchmarks and milestones" on aid to Iraq. Earlier this month he fought off legislatively mandated benchmarks in the $97 billion funding bill for Iraq and Afghanistan.

Mr. Obama agreed on April 23 to American Civil Liberties Union demands to release investigative photos of detainee abuse. Now's he reversed himself. Pentagon officials apparently convinced him that releasing the photos would increase the risk to U.S. troops and civilian personnel.

Throughout his presidential campaign, Mr. Obama excoriated Mr. Bush's counterinsurgency strategy in Iraq, insisting it could not succeed. Earlier this year, facing increasing violence in Afghanistan, Mr. Obama rejected warnings of a "quagmire" and ordered more troops to that country. He isn't calling it a "surge" but that's what it is. He is applying in Afghanistan the counterinsurgency strategy Mr. Bush used in Iraq.

As a candidate, Mr. Obama promised to end the Iraq war by withdrawing all troops by March 2009. As president, he set a slower pace of drawdown. He has also said he will leave as many as 50,000 Americans troops there.

These reversals are both praiseworthy and evidence that, when it comes to national security, being briefed on terror threats as president is a lot different than placating MoveOn.org and Code Pink activists as a candidate. The realities of governing trump the realities of campaigning.

Interesting that Rove is calling it 'welcome'. Article is worth a read. The domestic Obama gets far less praise.

We see a 2-track approach with Obama. Like the previous Democrat in the WHite House, he says one thing and does another. But his reasoning and mode are different. The speech-Obama is an idealist but a moderate toned one. The action-Obama is doing everything he can to maintain his power at all levels, from pushing Chrysler bondholders, to big spending and huge new regulation initiatives. Thus, he ends up both more liberal at home and more aggressive overseas, a true LBJ-style guns-and-butter war-and-statism President.