| About Us | Contact | Donate | User Blogs | Login |
The Antidote to "Spend-Too-Much"
We thank Grover Norquist for his thoughts on the crucial issue of transparency. This is genuinely an area in which Republicans, at the State level, have made real progress and shown genuine leadership. More like this, please. - Jon Henke
Republicans have learned how to deal with tax hikes. Since 1986, pro-taxpayer candidates have signed the "Taxpayer Protection Pledge" promising in writing to oppose any and all tax hikes. Those candidates like Bush 41 who signed and broke the pledge have been defeated. A strong and public message to others.
Since 1992 more than 90 percent of all Republican candidates for House and Senate have signed and kept the pledge. In 1993, Clinton had to rely solely on Democrats when he passed his tax hike.
Thanks to the pledge and a GOP that branded itself as the party that will not raise taxes there has not been a major tax hike in Washington DC since 1993. That is fifteen years without a net tax hike from Congress. That is the longest period in American history without a significant tax hike.
Still spending has increased too much. Much thought has gone into how we can "bell the cat" of spend-too-much.
There is now a strategy beginning to emerge.
In the fall of 2006, Gov. Rick Perry of Texas put his gubernatorial office's spending on the internet available for everyone in Texas-and the world-to see. The Texas Comptroller Susan Combs then did the same for all spending by all agencies in Texas, and legislation complementing her action was passed.
Of all state elected officials, Gov. Matt Blunt of Missouri probably went the furthest the fastest - issuing an executive order to put all state spending on the web with a search engine that makes it easy to follow how tax dollars are spent in the appropriately named "Show me State," and launching the site on the same day, on July 11, 2007. The Missouri Accountability Portal (MAP) has had more than seven million hits since.
Websites in Kansas, Oklahoma, South Carolina and Alaska are also up and running, with Kansas and Oklahoma being the results of legislation, while South Carolina and Alaska's websites were launched per gubernatorial action.
Similar laws have been passed in Utah, Washington State, Mississippi, Louisiana, Georgia, Maryland, Hawaii, Minnesota and, most recently, Arizona. State constitutional officers have also embarked on their own spending transparency efforts.
Suddenly, every check written in Missouri and other transparency states becomes a potential "Bridge to Nowhere" - a teaching moment on "spend-too-much." We remember the six hundred dollar hammer of the Reagan years. Taxpayers and voters understandably have a hard time getting their heads around "Three Trillion dollars" in federal spending. However, they can grasp a single earmark, travel costs, or a high salary, with this type of information readily available at their fingertips on the Missouri Accountability Portal.
School districts, county governments and other local government entities are beginning to feel the pressure to open up their checkbooks to public scrutiny. Before the decade is out every state, city and school district will be fully transparent. There is no good reason to say "no" to transparency. Only the corrupt have something to hide. Which politician wishes to advertise to the world that their books must be a secret?
The press loves transparency. It is the "lazy reporter wins a Pulitzer prize" legislation. Honest liberals like Ralph Nader have endorsed the effort. Conservatives trust that voters will benefit from seeing exactly how each check is spent.
As taxpayers are getting used to being able to tracking their tax dollars at a mouse click, we are beginning the long march to wrestling "spend- too- much" to the ground.
Americans for Tax Reform has also launched the Center for Fiscal Accountability, dedicated to shedding a light on government expenditures and promoting the principles of fiscal restraint and limited government. Sign up to receive a notification email when the website launches at www.fiscalaccountability.org.


Comments
Vitally Important
This is a fundamental issue. Transparency is a path to accountability (or exposing and eliminating lack thereof). Accountability is a hammer to get us to fiscal responsibility.
I am particularly interested in seeing it implemented at the school district level. We have had scandals where school construction companies and architects were behind hugely expensive school bond campaigns. We have seen school district supers that make $200,000/yr, have additional generous expense accounts, and put family members on the payroll. There are other abuses, and the general overabundance of administration bureaucrats in school systems.
This will not only help us save money, but I hope lead us to fundamental reforms in schools and in other govt programs.
I applaud the effort at transparency, but...
...transparency will not be enough to significantly reduce wasteful and unnecessary government spending. As long as the state can borrow from the future and print money, thereby allowing the taxpayer to be duped into believing their taxes haven't been raised in fifteen years, things will pretty much remain the same.
As long as government growth remains the structural goal of the state, Congress and the taxing class, government growth will continue to increase, even with total transparency, until the economy itself falters and millions are out of work. Even then it will be the taxing class who will be the last to see their paychecks stop.
ex animo
davidfarrar
spend-too-much
I assume you are equally as interested in the Bush administration being completely transparent about the enormous debt run up, and unaccounted for, to fight the Iraq war? Or, how about the accommodations made for the energy industry in secret meetings with VP Cheney?
Actually, yes we are
At least I am, anyway. Many of us realize that blatant cronyism and secrecy created a massive failure out of a presidency that actually had many things going for itself and should have done much better. 9/11 was a terrible overwhelming event that turned into a great distraction, an all-encompassing "cause" for President Bush to the detriment of many other good programs like education reform, faith-based initiatives, and the like. He completely lost his focus to terrorism. Now...acknowledging that flaw, I still have to say that I don't regret for a moment that this country has not been attacked once during his entire administration. But yes, I'm interested in furthering transparent, ethical government which submits itself to the will of the people and the Constitution of the United States (which, after all, IS the will of the people). Part of the success of Republican resurgence is that we are not in denial, we know our party's made tremendous mistakes, and the first step toward improvement is admitting we have a problem I don't see anything of the sort on the Democratic side. D-E-N-I-A-L is not a river in Egypt - it means "Don't Even kNow I Am Lying".
Taxes and Spending
Grover, you have done a nice job over the years focusing attention on "no tax increases", however, there comes a point when simply not raising taxes is not enough. Excessive spending must be reduced. This includes eliminating outmoded and obsolete government agencies and infrastructure. Ultimately, the only way to reduce taxes is to REDUCE GOVERNMENT! The outgoing Bush Administration has not been too bad on the tax front but they have been terrible on the spending front and they have presided over one of the greatest expansions of government in recent times. OUTRAGEOUS and you can convey my message to your friend Karl Rove.
Now I would suggest that you shift your efforts a bit towards reducing government, reducing spending, and tax REFORM.