Call to Arms: NY-23

in

The special election in New York's 23rd District is all the buzzz for people spent on reading about ObamaCare.

I myself am perplexed at why the RNC wants to sustain the beat down it experienced last November.

Last night, one of my more moderate friends asked me, "Would you rather have a Scozzafava win or a Democrat?"......

It's a legitimate question.

I tend to be more of an old-school Reagan conservative in my thinking. 

It's not about the party name to me, it's about the principles of the person collecting my tax dollars after election day. 

Call me old-fashioned, but I believe in electing people based on what they're actually going to do versus what their label is.

To me it's as simple as this: I want someone who is going to take their grubby hands off of my 70 hour-a-week, hard-earned dollars.  I want someone who is going to defend the values that I live my life by, and I want someone who is going to defend life. 

And anyone who deviates from these policies is not good enough to represent me, Republican/Democrat, or Liberal/Conservative.

To the general population, these principles fall into the category of conservatism.  So, Republican or Democrat, I want the candidate running to win who represents my views.

The biggest debate contrived from the hustle and bustle of this race points back to what the principles of the Republican party are/should be.  In my mind, Conservatives are NOT an extremist wing of the Republican party, contrary to MSM spin and "pale pastel" moderates.  I would say that if I had to put myself into a category it would be conservative. 

I believe many Americans desire less government intervention, less people telling them how to live my life or what to do with their money. 

These are not extreme ideas.  In fact, I'm pretty sure it's a luxury of the American people in general to favor less government.

The GOP has not picked candidates dedicated to these goals in a long time, and that is why the Republican party does not know what it stands for....

It's also why we need to start electing common sense, Reagan-type conservatives to represent that constituency.  That's why my support is going to Doug Hoffman.

We need to set a precedent on what the GOP stands for by showing consistency in our candidate picks -- by electing the Doug Hoffmans of the country.

0
Your rating: None

Comments

Where are the good Democrats?

19th entury Democrats

I am a Conservative hanging loosely onto the GOP, but uncomfortable with doing that. I wrote a book called THE CHANGING FACE OF DEMOCRATS, on Amazon as well as my site www.claysamerica.com.  In that book, I compare 19th century Democrats, beginning with Thomas Jefferson, James Madison, James Monroe, of course, all the way to Grover Cleveland to the 20th century Democrats. The 19th century party was more libertarian than are the current crop who calls themselves libertarians. The 20th century Democrat is in lockstep with Rousseau and Marx, rejecting the Jefferson crowd. They believe, and demonstrate it, that a few elite like themselves should rule the many, like us.

 Marx, and those like him who condemn capitalism (their word) and individual freedom, say the interests of the community, which they define, are far more important than are the interests of individuals. It was Bastiat who said the legitimate self interests of individuals generate harmony in community, something the modern Democrat rejects with passion. Individual freedom began as an active philosophy following the landing and settlements of the Pilgrims in 1620. It created the free market and the enormous prosperity experienced in America. Jamestown brought us more of the European style of the few ruling the many, which, thank God, failed to gain permanent traction in America as a tradition. However, it is the modern Democrat who would accept Jamestown and its ideals of king and serf over the Judeo-Christian ideals of Plymouth. So, in my studies and comparing the earlier Democrats to the newer ones, I have developed a soft spot in my heart for the Jefferson Democrats of libertarians who fought so hard to retain the sovereignty of individuals, their local governments and the rights of the states that formed the Union. I simply wish we could have them back in charge, and at that time I would drop the Republican Party like a red hot piece of coal.  The Republicans have been somewhat consistent since Alexander Hamilton (a Federalist), Henry Clay (a Whig), Abraham Lincoln up to Teddy Roosevelt, all of whom desired a strong, interventionist central government in either New York or, later, Washington, D.C. The Republicans, except for Goldwater and Reagan, actually have more of what they wanted all these years, with the current Democrat leadership. They have a herd of confused libertarian-leaning conservatives like me being dragged along unhappily behind their anointed ones who so often compromise with the elite. How can we get those early Democrats back?