| About Us | Contact | Donate | User Blogs | Login |
Happened the same day
.Waxman to push global warming bill
Comprehensive global warming legislation will be sent to the House floor by Memorial Day, House Energy and Commerce Committee Chairman Henry Waxman (D-Calif.) announced Thursday.
By Mike Soraghan
Posted: 01/15/09 11:22 AM [ET]
Bitter cold settles over wide swath of US
By David Sharp
Associated Press Writer / January 15, 2009
PORTLAND, Maine—A bone-numbing blast of arctic air settled over the Northeast for an extended stay with extreme temperatures Thursday that fell to 38 below zero in northern Maine, cold enough to idle ski lifts, silence snowmobiles and send people indoors.
I'm sure the subzero temperatures tonight across the Northeast explain why we should add hundreds of billions to the federal deficit to deal with warming. I'm just not quite sure why.
- Ironman's blog
- Login or register to post comments


Comments
Cue the whining:
"Weather isn't climate!"
weather is climate dependent though.
you guys apparently all missed the lectures on chaos theory and temperature.
The prediction for NA in terms of "what effect will global warming have" has been "more storms, more energy in the system that needs stirring up (going from equator to poles)" and yes, some warming (two degrees of change is an awful lot in this scenario). But it says nothing about droughts, waves of snow in Seattle, etc. other than to say "things will change". Again, this is my popscience "I actually listen when scientists are on TV" view. I mean, if they can't even get the pace of polar melting right, why should we expect exact predictions in a particular timezone???
What does this mean? Anything unusual is likely to be part of the global warming phenomenon, and we don't really have enough data and models to figure out what the likely stuff is going to be.
Monitoring weather and climate is notoriously difficult.
So if they aren;t accurate a week out with forecasts
We should bet $10 Trillion that they are right 50 years from now.
This is "chaos theory" all right. ......which is a fancy way of saying they have no bleepin idea why things happen and are simply pulling an answer out of their lowest orifice.
Don;t try junk sceince on a glass eyed banker.
Forget it.
Forget it, Ironman, the science of global warming doesn't really matter anymore to the left. They have come to believe it with a faith-like adherence. It is just like John Kerry said during his campaign: even if global warming turns out to be false, let's do cap-and-trade anyway, because the result will be a cleaner environment regardless! Never mind, of course, what it will do to the economy. That isn't really a consideration when contemplating Mother Gaia.
Sarah Palin has more reason to believe in AGW than I do
It is 39 right now in Wasilla, AK
http://www.weather.com/outlook/health/coldandflu/local/USAK0264?lswe=Wasilla,%20AK&lwsa=Weather36HourColdAndFluCommand&from=searchbox_typeahead
It is 8 in CT
http://www.weather.com/outlook/health/coldandflu/local/USCT0033?from=recentsearch
Wow, Ironman, once again you've nailed it!
All those scientists with their advanced degress and years of training, all the time they spend studying masses of data - and you confound them all by reporting two headlines that appeared in the paper on the same day.
Bravo!
Well, I'm not expert at reading prehistoric tree rings
But I DO know that this was the actual, real world temperature as I put my son on the bus this morning in "temperate" southern Connecticut
-8°
Might I suggest to the Left that if a couple of hot days justifies the deindustrialization of western civilization, the coldest weather I've experienced south of Albany is an equally strong argument not to tax the American economy back to the Stone Age.
Deindustrialization?
A bit hyperbolic, aren't we?
well, let's take this bill
http://www.cga.ct.gov/2008/FC/2008HB-05600-R000755-FC.htm
I have no doubt that the stated goals will be missed in this bill, and the CT politicians will blantantly ignore the fact they wasted their time on useless legislation; but it will be grapeshot for liberal lawyers to tie up all that infrastructure stuff Obama wants in reams of lawsuits
Now,. barring some unforeseeable technological advance, how is a state whose population is already substantially larger than it was in 1990 or 2000 going to get anywhere near these goals without outsourcing every possible CO2 source beyond New England?
This is like King Canute telling the tide not to come in. But the good King didn't try and banish all his subject''s burning of turf and coal to prevent it.