Message to Senator Dodd: You first

Talking Head Chris Dodd appeared on Face the Nation this morning.  His statements will be remembered  for their breathtaking chutzpah

 A key senator says the nation's car companies should have to replace top executives in exchange for a long-term bailout package from Congress.

Sen. Chris Dodd heads the Senate Banking Committee. He says he is hopeful Congress will pass a short-term $15 billion aid package for the automakers in the next several days. But the Connecticut Democrat says the companies should have to restructure if they want a more significant bailout from Congress next year.

Dodd says the companies need quick cash to avoid collapse in the next several weeks. But over the long-term, Dodd says Chrysler probably ought to merge with another company and General Motors should be required to replace chief executive Rick Wagoner.

http://biz.yahoo.com/ap/081207/congress_autos.html

Now, Chris, I'm with you on Wagoner walking the plank. After all, GM is hemorraging money and Wagoner failed to prevent this from happening.

But, shouldn't you be held to the same standard as Rick Wagoner? 

You've admitted the Wall Street bailout that you principally drafted largely failed http://thenextright.com/ironman/chris-dodd-on-the-bank-bailout-yep-i-pulled-a-plaxico

You spent the critical month of August 2008 at your vacation home in Ireland instead of working to prevent the financial meltdown http://www.thenextright.com/ironman/oh-doddy-boy-the-banks-the-banks-are-failing 

You were the number one recipient of campaign funds from Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac  and your all time top contributor, Citigroup http://www.opensecrets.org/politicians/contrib.php?cycle=Career&cid=N00000581 just got an early $20 Billion Christmas present from the Treasury, just like all the other friends you have on Wall Street going hat in hand http://thenextright.com/ironman/the-best-senate-banking-chairman-money-can-buy    (Funny, I don't recall the heads of Citigroup or Bank of America being asked to tender their resignation prior to getting taxpayer bailout money?)Then again, you've always been a "reliable friend' the banking industry http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2007/02/15/AR2007021501555.html

Your "reliable friends" at Countrywide Mortgage are being investigated by the G-Men http://deepbackground.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/10/30/1613877.aspx 

You tried to enrich ACORN at the expense of the taxpayers when you drafted the Wall Street Bailout http://thenextright.com/ozarkguru/major-earmark-in-democrat-bailout-agreement

Now, I'm sure you are going to say that Rick Wagoner lacked vision since he failed to foresee the collapse of his industry. Well, how aren't you equally culpable?

You said your bill in July 2008 was the answer to the housing crisis http://blogs.courant.com/on_background/2008/07/housing-bill-finally-heads-to.html

This was after in March of 2007, you said legislation on foreclosures was unnecessary http://query.nytimes.com/gst/fullpage.html?res=9E01EEDE1530F930A15750C0A9619C8B63

And before the complete meltdown of the global financial system you said you did not expect "many more banks to fail" http://thehill.com/leading-the-news/dodd-does-not-expect-many-more-banks-to-fail-2008-07-14.html and told people not to "panic" http://www.usnews.com/usnews/politics/bulletin/bulletin_080715.htm

Rick Wagoner has gone through tens of billions of shareholder equity. What is the present estimate of the various financial bailouts out there? (I' ve seen $7 Trillion!) http://money.cnn.com/2008/11/26/news/economy/where_bailout_stands/index.htm?postversion=2008112615

Maybe had Dodd not lived in Iowa in 2007 this could have been avoided http://www.gwu.edu/~action/2008/ia08/doddiavisits07.html

On September 23 I called for Dodd to step down as Banking Committee Chairman

Does anyone think Chris Dodd's performance since September 23 as Banking Committtee Chairman has done anything worthy of his retention?

How has he proven to be any less incompetent than Rick Wagoner?

I await the Senator's response.

5
Your rating: None Average: 5 (1 vote)

Comments

Bravo!

You forgot when Dodd blocked regulation of Fannie/Freddie in 2005, shelving Paulson's April 2008 blueprint for financial regulation 'until after the election' (which is when I realized he had to go), and just listening to him chairing any of the recent hearings.

You might also ask the Senate to re-organize their committees to re-align with the Executive Branch, which the House did early in 2007.  There is something very odd about a committee named 'Banking, Housing, and Urban Development'.

 

sorry...

boy you can use bandwidth listing Dodd's screwups!

"At the end of my tenure on this committee," Dodd said in early 2007, "I want it to be said that the safety and soundness of our financial institutions was not weakened on my watch."

The root cause, incidentally

in the auto makers skid from weakness to insolvency is,,,,the banking crisis!

http://seekingalpha.com/article/109542-half-of-u-s-consumers-delaying-new-car-purchases?source=article_lb_articles

The biggest factor holding down car sales is the continuing banking crisis.. Like, the one Senator Dodd said wouldn;t happen.

 

 

do you have no concept of a bubble?

or of loss of consumer confidence?

It's like a friend of mine said "republicans can't keep more than one idea in their head at once"

do you have no concept of preventing a bubble?

Isn't that within the "safety and soundness" portfolio of the Senate Banking Committee chairman?

My bad. Those were his campaign contributors inflating the bubble and instead of dealing with the looming crisis, Chris moved to Iowa on a delusional Presidential bid.

Maybe Republicans think that when they are given a job to do, they ought to stick with it until it gets done.

I guess it's easier to tell everyone not to panic just weeks before Wall Street collapses.  At least Captain Smith eyeballed the iceberg before it hit the Titanic.

the fruck? (typo silly and intentional)

Do you have any idea of separation of powers at all?

The Federal Reserve Chairman responsible is an appointed position of the Executive branch, who is nonpartisan (theoretically, at least. in reality Greenspan was Randian and everyone knew it) .

If you're going to bitch about a vote that happened in 1990 or so (when greenspan was confirmed) the burden of proof rests on you to show that there were actual acceptable alternatives (shouldn't be hard, deregulate everything was a really dumb idea).

I'm not going to bother to read the law, but just by consulting wiki, I can see that the law says that Greenspan needed to show up to talk about the fed's priorities. However, I don't see any more legal oversight that the congress CAN give to the Federal Reserve Chairman.  Maybe I'm wrong on that -- wiki is not unfalible.

But seriously, barring a floorfight about interest rates (do you really want us passing a law every time we lower or raise interest rates?????), what SPECIFICALLY could Dodd have done to rein in the bubble -- particularly considering that he wasn't even Chairman of that Committee at the time?

Dodd bears some culpability, no doubt about it. But when it's the executive branch mucking things up, the blame rests primarily there. If you put a gun to my head and asked which Senator bears the most blame -- maybe Biden?

Yes, it is sound governmental policy to lie to investors (no not really). At least, we've been doing it for the past thirty years or so. I'm all in favor of reporting the U6 (more than 12% unemployment) and some better inflation rates. Instead, the government releases stupid statistics that are patently false, and then people need to pay to make the real ones (it's a good business, I guess. but then why bother with the government statistics???) so that businesses don't go bankrupt.

since your post is completely incoherent

I won't respond in any detail, expcept to point out that if Dodd's role was insignificant in creating the problem, how can he claim he can fix it?

Did Chris Dodd protect the safety and soundness of the banking system? It's sorta a simple question unless you don't like the answer

well, as I've pointed out, he's now the chairman of his committe

also, now he's probably got more political will from the people for change in our system.

Secondly, I don't think that he can fix the whole mess by himself -- that's just ludicrous. But I believe actions taken by Bernanke (forcing hedge funds to disclose any short positions -- which effectively eliminated many hedge funds from the market) mean that the new Fed Chairman is interested in increasing the transparency of our financial markets.

I think that Dodd could eliminate hedge funds by crafting a bill (if that's in his purview, idk if it is).