| About Us | Contact | Donate | User Blogs | Login |
The collateral damage of the naysaying pundits
As is readily apparent, many so-called "conservative" pundits like George Will http://www.thenextright.com/ironman/george-will-empty-suit-behind-the-bow-tie. Peggy Noonan http://www.peggynoonan.com/article.php?article=438 and David Brooks http://www.sltrib.com/opinion/ci_10830202 decided that rather than offer even tepid support to the McCain-Palin ticket, it would be way more fun to fire off a weekly columm attacking them and their campaign as incompetent.
Now John McCain and Sarah Palin are a big boy and a big girl and probably couldn;t give a rat's tukkus that some writers dissed them. And they can look to the political environment and their own campaigns to explain a 6 point loss. Friendly fire didn't cost them that many votes.
But the elite pundits ought now to consider that while fragging Mac and Sarah for their alleged deficiencies, they inflicted a lot of collateral damage on the rest of the Republican party. Let's assume that some moderately substantial number of right-of-center voters were sufficiently moved by the media blitz of disgrunted conservative writers to stay home.
Well, George, Peggy & David, Senator Merkley sends his regards http://www.nydailynews.com/news/us_world/2008/11/06/2008-11-06_oregon_race_for_us_senate_called_for_jef.html
Congressman Kratovil also says thanks http://wjz.com/local/andy.harris.frank.2.861518.html
Congressman Perriero also will probably say thanks too http://www.inrich.com/cva/ric/news.apx.-content-articles-RTD-2008-11-07-0207.html
and we're still waiting to see if Senator Begich http://www.aksuperstation.com/news/local/34276439.html, Senator Franken http://www.upi.com/Top_News/2008/11/10/Franken_within_204_votes_of_Coleman/UPI-19251226343255/, Senator Martin http://www.ajc.com/services/content/metro/stories/2008/11/11/senate_chambliss_martin.html?cxtype=rss&cxsvc=7&cxcat=13 or Congressman Brown http://www.sacbee.com/capitolandcalifornia/story/1383995.html will also be sending warm regards
You see, when you decide to go shiv the top of the ticket, the entire party suffers when voters decide not to bother to vote. And did it go unnoticed that Republican turnout was down this year. http://politicalwire.com/archives/2008/11/07/republican_turnout_declined.html
Notice how few liberals before the election---even those who were die-hard Hillary people---publicly dissed Barack Obama. That's because. hey ---they actually think winning elections sorta matters.
And it matters a whole lot for people out there in Senate and Congressional races downballot. I'm not sure what any of these people (save Ted Stevens) did to deserve this, but as I pointed out, fragmentation grenades are rather inexact weapons.
At some point a bill will pass that will be horrendously repugnant to any thoughtful Republican. It will pass by one vote---because one of these people wasn't there to stop it.
I look forward to the very erudite apology from the salon set "conservatives" then--hardly--they'll still be blaming the Republican rank and file as if we are the problem.
- Ironman's blog
- Login or register to post comments


Comments
Bill Buckley was both loved
Bill Buckley was both loved and influential because he was able to frame his ideas in a way that built a conservative coalition, strengthened conservative candidates and debunked liberal palaver (both Democratic and Republica)--even in hard times, like after the Goldwater defeat or the Nixon resignation.
Will, Noonan and Brooks care more about expressing idiosyncratic opinions than building anything workable. How many conservative candidates have they been influential in electing? As you point out, there are a number of good conservative candidates they hurt.
Their defense is that integrity demands that they say what they think no matter what the impact. Unlike Buckley and William Rusher, they are not wise enough to frame their thoughts to help and heal. That's why their legacy is as talking heads rather than unofficial but very real statesmen and women.