| About Us | Contact | Donate | User Blogs | Login |
The Human Cost of War
An interesting observation from Byron York, the Washington Examiner's Chief Political Correspondant.
" So far this month, 38 American troops have been killed in Afghanistan. For all of 2009, the number is 220 -- more than any other single year and more than died in 2001, 2002, 2003, and 2004 combined.
With casualties mounting, the debate over U.S. policy in Afghanistan is sharp and heated. The number of arrivals at Dover is increasing. But the journalists who once clamored to show the true human cost of war are nowhere to be found. "
I hate to use the term "liberal media bias" because, like most political rhetoric, it is far too broad to really mean anything at all. But think back to all the print media and television outlets that would constantly show tear-jerking images of countless caskets draped in U.S. flags of fallen soldiers in the Middle East. Compare the frequency of those images between 2003-2008 to the frequency which with we see them today. Considering the statistics York mentions above, it's an interesting change in the media's style of journalism.


Comments
?
The U.S. government completely banned all such images from even being made by the press in those years, so it's unclear what planet to which you're referring.
You can see instances of
You can see instances of photos being released, talked about, and focused on by the media here and here. The point is that while it used to be a frequent subject of debate, now that the ban has been lifted the media has quickly forgotten about it.