| About Us | Contact | Donate | User Blogs | Login |
We Need Service-Oriented Infratructure
Colin Delany makes a crucial point at e.politics (and techPresident) about the importance of (a) integrating new/internet/social media with the rest of the organization rather than siloing it as one department among many, and (b) treating new media as a force multiplier for existing goals.
[Former Obama new media director Joe Rospars said] his department was NOT a part of the campaign's tech team. Instead, it was coequal with communications, field/grassroots, finance, etc., and was in fact just as much a client of the technology folks as, say, the press team was.
His remark jumped out at me because it's true so rarely. More often, online organizers and online advocacy staff are put in the technology box rather than allowed to be communicators ... And online communicators are often the last people consulted when messaging and outreach strategy are being planned, when they should be a part of the process from the beginning. [...] [I]t's not the tools, it's the people and how they're organized and directed to USE the tools.
The Obama campaign used the internet as well as they did not because they employed tools that were particularly new (database-driven field organizing, email fundraising, online video and social networking have all been around for years) but because they worked out human systems to put those tools to work effectively.
It is important that we don't put the technology cart before the mission horse. The internet simply changes the scale at which we can productively do things that people already want to do. As I've written previously, the Leftosphere is not effective because they can fundraise and mobilize activists. They are effective because they can communicate and organize people around a message. Fundraising and activism is a product of communication and organization.
I've outlined the correct course and order for rebuilding the Right as follows.
- ...better information organization, which helps create coalesce a movement around...
- ...the organizing agenda, out of which flows...
- ...the storyline, narrative, which motivates...
- ...the grassroots/netroots to get engaged, mobilized and donating, all of which is channeled effectively by...
- ...the infrastructure, both online and offline.
Notice that the first 3 steps are really about information organization, ideas and communication. It's not until we get to step 4 - when people are actually motivated to do something - that new, innovative technology really becomes necessary to turn information into more tangible results.
The key: new media operations need to be service-oriented.
The internet is not an organization, full of people to direct. It is a market, full of people who already have things they want to do.
We need to stop approaching the internet with a "what do I want them to accomplish?" mindset. Instead, our campaigns and infrastructure need to ask, "what do they want to accomplish and how can we help?"
- Jon Henke's blog
- Login or register to post comments


Comments
On the Money
I hope others are listening.
Trippi had it right
Decentralization of campaigns is where we FAIL (and where BO showed the world how to run a presidential campaign). Good stuff here.
republicans have a real problem there.
even their grassroots aren't very good at the decentralization thing. this is why they pursued the waffling thing to death -- they like clear leadership, etc etc.
Folks, clear leadership isn't nearly as good as adroit leadership. talk to any army man, and he'll tell you the same thing -- it's the sergeants that win the war.
It reminds me of 1999
The distinction you are drawing is what differentiated successful efforts from underperforming or failed efforts at building an online presence in the business world in the late '90s. You are exactly right that in order to be successful new media must be seen as a vital and essential element of every department's toolkit. It was a titanic effort in many companies to get the sales organization, the marketing organization, product development, etc. to recognize why and how to succeed online.
Back then evangelists highlighted the opportunity; later it became a competitive advantage; then well exectuted and integrated online channels became a differentiator. Now, it is simply a necessity and a given in the business space.
Politics and campaigns have lagged in finding value online; none moreso than our beloved GOP. The Democrats had it forced on them by the netroots. MoveOn, Kos, etc. made their presence felt and were at first unwelcome, then they liked the money, and now these elements are more and more part of the furniture. The GOP has yet to figure out how new media will work for us. Will there be an internet fueled revolt among conservative activists or will the party organs effectively integrate new media into their toolkits to harness and empower supporters? Or will an as yet unrecognized approach emerge?
From the party perspective, there is a lot of expertise in the business world for how to do this. I hope the GOP is able to get the people and resources in place to reorient itself to these necessities.