| About Us | Contact | Donate | User Blogs | Login |
Muhammed, Bush and Muslim Prejudice
I'm noting the intersection today of the criticisms of Muhammed for his 'sins' and the criticisms of the Bush Administration's attitude toward water boarding.
What most people didn't object to in 2002 while the fear of terrorism was a close as their breath, with the subsiding of that fear and memory, the public is now moreso criticizing Bush and Co for failing to live up to American ideals during time of war.
[It is noted that indeed there were many who objected DURING the war.]
In this context, I offer a review of the biography of Muhammed:
To understand the prophet we have to understand the environment he had to work with and the culture of chivalry that he was part of.He was not born in an age of social security, old age homes and political correctness.
Muhammad's mission emerged in a war zone, if u want a modern parallel think of the Krips and Bloods magnified by a thousand, Think ethnic cleansing in Bosnia/Serbia. For those with more historical erudtiion think of Japan in the Muromachi period.
In the midst of such turmoil and suffering a noble warrior emerges, his basic message to the people is that we are all the same, no tribe or person is superior to another there is only one god ie we are all part of the unity of things.
This in a nutshell is the sahadah or testimony of the Islamic faith. He preaches the message in peace at first and maintains this peaceful mission despite persecution of him and his followers. When the persecution becomes too great and the powers that be refuse to change their evil ways, god grants him the authority to fight. Muhammad takes up the mantle for war even though his army is still low in their numbers and their resources pitiful. Miraculously with he help of God, Muhammed an his followers are able to overcome their adversaries and are able to create a new civilisation. This is how a Hollywood movie would portray the prophets life, it's a lot more digestible now isn't it?
Muhammad sanctioned the death of a lot of people, but he spared the lives of a lot of people too even though he would be justified in taking their lives as an example to others or in self defense.
Some people will avoid the truth and become enemies of it,or it is their dharma to protect the old order,rightly or wrongly(as is the case of his own uncle)This will lead to more bloodshed injustice and suffering than if they are allowed to live.
God wont just wave a wand and everyone will be cleansed and purified, this defeats the whole purpose of human existence,destiny and responsibility. When we are able to extricate our limited grasp of the human experience from our cosy suburban cages we can see the true genius of the prophet. In a war situation, a person has to be a warrior, The prophet of Islam is the greatest warrior that ever lived, he did not shy away from the responsibilities and the horrors of war, for someone who was of such a sensitive and ascetic disposition it must have been unbearably painful.In Muhammed we see the personification of Arjuna in the Bhagvad Gita.Muhammed waged war,selflessly and with absolute trust in gods will(bhakti).He did not indulge in the power and privelige his victories bought him(he married mostly widows and died with hardly anything to his name.) In the character of the prophet Muhammad we see the character of God, that is what is meant by his saying `he who has seen me has seen god'. As god says his wrath is great, but his mercy overrideth his wrath.In fact gods wrath is illusionary, it is a mercy in disguise.(that is an esoteric principle which need exploration)
Muhammad was harsh and decisive when necessary, in life harshness is necessary ,let alone in a period of warring states. The harshness he displayed is as the harshness of god. Muhammad was equally generous (he spared the jew that bewitched him,forgave the people of Taif etc etc. He always maintained that the peaceful path was superior to the path of confrontation.
Muhammad and Islam is problem for people who have a problem with accepting reality as it is and want spirituality to be an escape from facing the truth about ourselves and the evil within us.
All Reliogus mythology,in fact all moral systems emerge out of conflict betwen opposing forces,so it seems very peculiar that Islam is singled out as being inhernetly violent, when in fact all moral systems we know in any civilisation have pretty much the same origins.Christ did not bring a new civilisation,he was a reformer of an existing one. Muhammed integrated both yin and yang of the spiritual path.He was able to be the sitting and walking Buddha in one.In his example i can see the spiritual perfection aspired towards by a sage in every religion,he managed to reconcile heaven and earth and mastered and mediated between both.
Muhammad is a true example to all humanity of how spirituality should be exercised in all conditions of life,not just when we have the luxury to live in an ideological bubble. A truly remarkable Human Being.
-jin (Amazon book reviewer)
I also take just a moment to say that I find some comments here concerning those who follow Islam to be as 'extremist' as the recent characterizations here of Islam and the people who practice that faith.
I have known many Muslim people who are in no way extremists, violent or ignorant.
On the whole, of those I've met, I've found them to be intelligent, reverent, and much more mild mannered than most who participate on this blog!
From my studies of the history of all religions it seems apparent that each 'prophet' came asa wayshower to a different population at various times thru history. Mohammed delivered amessage that could be heard and accepted by the desert population of the Middle East, and so it would come as no surprise that it spoke to them 'from where they were'. I find it helpful tohear the teachings (whatever the religion) with that in mind.


Comments
Muslim prejudice
What a lot of back written apologetic codswallop....forget your belief examine the facts just the facts. He was remarkable in that he was a murderer, pedophile, delusional, and could fool people into thinking he was a prophet that's what is remarkable...
...Mohammed's teachings 'the sword of islam' have made violence endemic in islam never mind the middle class fence sitters saying it is a religion of peace-----yeah sure.........At least the violent ones are honest in their approach....not hypocrits.
Truth hurts....What you are misconstruing is that political incorrectness isn't prejudice. Mohammed was a pedophile,-child bride Aishya.. and a violent man taken to delusional fantasies...He had very few saving graces and if you don't believe then just read the koran and the hadithas...I think the form of hinduism or paganism that was there before islam was probably gentler, black stone kaabas and idols to boot...
In the end result...I could say that islam is the sufis, but in actual fact a religion is what the majority practise and preach....all the tenets of islam so far I'm not happy with....
my online experience with Muslims
A couple of months after 9/11, I made a point to seek out Muslim forums and figure out what made them tick, ideologically. One accident was that the moniker I chose on one of the forums was mistaken as a female one, although that wasn't my intent! :P It did lead to some occasional deferential treatment, but it actually prompted several to overreach under an assumption that I was either more timid or less educated than a male. (this is a common occurrence on public forums, anyway)
Anyway, I found that, theologically, they had a LOT in common with fundamentalist Christians. Sure, the names of their prophet was different but they had a lot of common beliefs:
--- scriptural inerrancy of their holy book
--- belief that their prophet represented the idealized person
--- misogynist attitudes about the roles of women in society
--- strongly negative attitudes towards homosexuals and non-believers
--- belief in the increasing decadence of society, particularly focused on evolution
--- pseudo-scientific interpretations of their scripture to prove compatibility with science
--- desire to return to a pristine past, when society followed their religion and all was good
--- explain away all misdeeds done by their religion as the acts of misguided followers
In the course of various discussions with muslims on the forum, I noticed a particularly violent strain of posters. They were not in the mainstream of the forum, but also were not actively censored or disciplined for some of their more incendiary comments.
At one point, one of the posters began talking vividly of how near he was to the Heathrow Airport in London, and how easy it would be for him to shoot down a jet with a shoulder-launched missile.
Considering some of the other extremist comments made, I decided to report that post. I called the Secret Service about it, and they directed me to Scotland Yard. So, I got the ok from my boss and called Scotland Yard from my work phone. I gave the information to the guy on the phone and he even went to the forum, reviewed the comments and said they would follow up.
A couple of weeks later, Heathrow Airport was shut down by authorities there. Apparently they thought there was enough evidence to follow up. I'll never know if my call had anything to do with it, the timing could have been coincidental or they may have already been aware of it. However, the website also shut down their forum not long after that.
That said, the vast majority of Muslims seemed like perfectly normal people, albeit very interested in getting people to see the "light" of their religion -- very much like some very Christian cousins I have.
But, like Christianity, there exists a particularly violent strain of believer who is prepare to do whatever is necessary to push his religion to a point of ascendancy in society. It's very important that the moderates deal with these extremists rather than tolerate their presence. This only taints the general view of their religion and makes it impossible for them to gain the trust of the general public.
But, like Christianity,
Let me guess . . .the Pope?