WITH A STROKE OF THE PEN SOFT TYRANNY BEGINS JANUARY 20TH

President Barack Obama with a Stroke of a pen on January 20, 2009, will institute his own ideology by implementing and reversing eight years of Bush Executive Orders. The Washington Post reports, that "Transition advisers to President-elect Barack Obama have compiled a list of about 200 Bush administration actions and executive orders that could be swiftly undone to reverse White House policies on climate change, stem cell research, reproductive rights and other issues, according to congressional Democrats, campaign aides and experts working with the transition team." Another article from LifeNews.com also quoting the Washington Post Article stating that Cecile Richards, the president of Planned Parenthood, the nation's largest abortion business, told the Post that she expects Obama to rescind the protections on taxpayer-funded abortions and abortion counseling immediately after his inauguration. "We have been communicating with his transition staff" almost daily, Richards said. "We expect to see a real change." The Post also indicates that Rep. Diana DeGette, a Colorado Democrat who has been one of the primary members of Congress pushing for embryonic stem cell research funding, prodded Obama during the campaign to make it a priority. She told the newspaper that supporters of funding the destructive and unproven research have already drafted language for an executive order that Obama can use. Responding to the news, Patrick J. Mahoney of the Christian Defense Coalition told LifeNews.com that Obama's making taxpayers fund abortion takes away from his claims to want to govern from the center and find common ground on abortion. Mahoney said "it would greatly increase abortions around the world. It would also create a scenario in which American evangelicals and Catholics would be paying for abortion referrals through their tax dollars." "If President-elect Obama reverses this policy, it would show a complete and blatant disregard for the faith values of millions of American Christians as well as expanding the violence and tragedy of abortion worldwide. America should be exporting justice and human rights, not brutality and violence," he said. On January 20, 2009 with the stroke of a pen Barack Obama plans to enact "Soft Tyranny" by exercising his executive power and not wait for congressional action. In a AP story, John Podesta, Obama's transition chief, said Sunday Obama is reviewing President Bush's executive orders on those issues and others as he works to undo policies enacted during eight years of Republican rule. He said the president can use such orders to move quickly on his own. "There's a lot that the president can do using his executive authority without waiting for congressional action, and I think we'll see the president do that," Podesta said. "I think that he feels like he has a real mandate for change. We need to get off the course that the Bush administration has set." Executive Orders have been used by sitting presidents since 1789 even though no provision or statute that explicitly permits Executive Orders exists in the U.S. Constitution. Only two Executive Orders have ever been overturned by the U.S. Supreme Court, so President Obama's pen may bring a "Soft Tyranny." Soft tyranny is an idea first coined by Alexis de Tocqueville in his 1835 work entitled Democracy in America. In effect, soft tyranny occurs whenever the social conditions of a people hinder any prospect of hope among its members, with soft tyranny comes hope lost and freedom lost for the individual and a movement for the good of the collective. C.S. Lewis in his work "The Humanitarian Theory of Punishment" expresses that this soft tyranny is the most oppressive because we as a people are tormented day and night for our own good. "Of all tyrannies a tyranny sincerely exercised for the good of its victims may be the most oppressive. It may be better to live under robber barons than under omnipotent moral busybodies. The robber baron's cruelty may sometimes sleep, his cupidity may at some point be satiated, but those who torment us for our own good will torment us without end, for they do so with the approval of their own conscience." -C.S. Lewis from "The Humanitarian Theory of Punishment" 2502552544_16ab5bff6b I believe President Obama on January 20, 2009 with the power of his pen will increase the power of the State over the individual implementing a soft tyranny. Out of this tyranny is a government that believes that it must decide what’s in the best interest of their citizens, as opposed to the people themselves. -LEX REX http://theinvisiblehand.typepad.com

1
Your rating: None Average: 1 (1 vote)

Comments

you ain't a civil liberties type guy are ya?

so sorry. I will be against any executive orders that directly contradict legistlation. LIKE THE HUNDREDS that bush has put into place.

don't know why you're bothering to quote toqueville, but I can too!

As one digs deeper into the national character of the Americans, one sees that they have sought the value of everything in this world only in the answer to this single question: how much money will it bring in?

Grant me thirty years of equal division of inheritances and a free press, and I will provide you with a republic.

I cannot help fearing that men may reach a point where they look on every new theory as a danger, every innovation as a toilsome trouble, every social advance as a first step toward revolution, and that they may absolutely refuse to move at all.

Let's roll, America!

So..

And what exactly was Bush doing if not "tyranny" when he lumped increasing power into the executive branch, trod over the seperation of powers enshrined in the Constitution by adding more signing statements to legislation than all other presidents combined? Unwinding these wrongs should be a priority and I hope that Obama follows through with what he says.

all partisans have a double standard

I am not pointing figures at anyone or any particular party... it's human nature to always apologize for "our guys" while blaming "them".

For example, when something bad happens, a Republican partisan generally will, in order of preference:

1. blame the Democratic president in office

2. if a Republican president was in office, blame the Democratic congress

3. if Republicans also controlled Congress, blame the Democratic minority for obstructionism

For Democratic partisans, simply use the same formula but reverse the parties. Now you have your full set of finger-pointing talking points for posting on blogs!

There are litmus tests for each party. For Republicans, simply ask them about Jimmy Carter. If their response is anything along the lines of Carter was a terrible president who ruined the economy (which was saved by Reagan), then you are probably talking to a partisan.

Democrats have a very similar litmus test on Bush, Sr.

 

 

Bush Senior wasn't a bad guy, and I'm a Democrat

so I guess I must not be a partisan (yay, logic). ;-)

I actually thought Reagan "bring us to the brink of nuclear war by fighting a cornered rat" was a lot scarier.

about soft tyranny comment

Check out this article on soft tyranny - exactly what u were talkin bout

 

e