Ministry of Fear

Fear and Loathing in the White House

by Lance Thompson

 Barack Obama rode to the presidency on a tidal wave of campaign enthusiasm, famously promising Hope and Change.  Instead, his administration has been governed by Fear and Loathing.  The arguments for Obama’s health care reform bill–ten pages shy of two thousand pages at last count–have all used fear.  Twenty million Americans are without health insurance, we are told, then 32 million, then 47 million.  If we don’t pass this massive, indecipherable bill, insurance will be unaffordable, you will go broke if you get sick, millions will die.  Prescription drug companies, insurance companies, doctors and hospitals who question the grand prophecies of the bill’s proponents are told that if they protest this massive takeover of one sixth of the economy, they will be punished with retributive amendments and strangled by federal regulation.    The cap and trade bill was sold in the same way.  If we don’t hobble our industries with restrictions and regulations, the Earth will grow warm, ice caps will melt, polar bears will starve, coastal cities will be inundated.  Carbon dioxide, a gas all animals exhale, is now a toxic substance that must be regulated as well.  We are all polluters, and we must literally be saved from ourselves.  The stimulus bill passed on fear and panic.  If we don’t pump $800 billion into the economy within a week, the market will crash, millions will lose their jobs, your savings will vanish, your home will be foreclosed, you will be living in an appliance box under the freeway.  The federal government took over banks, auto companies, Wall Street firms, this time applying the voice of terror to the corporate officers and boards of directors.  If you don’t agree to a government takeover, your pay will be cut, your pensions cancelled, your stock made worthless.  Go along with us, or the full weight of the federal government will be used to crush you.  What the Obama administration cannot convince us to fear, they loathe.  The administration loathes our international allies.  The White House significantly recharacterized the “special relationship” we’ve had with Great Britain since World War II to a “special partnership,” putting our English cousins at arm’s length. We observe diplomatic niceties with Iran, Libya and leaders of Hamas while warning the Israelis we may shoot down their jets if they do the world a favor and knock out Ahmadinejad’s nukes.  The French, whose relationship with the United States warmed when Sarkozy took over, are snubbed when Obama is too busy to meet with the French President on a European trip.  Taiwan and Japan look for backup from us against North Korean missile launches, but we scarcely can find the time to lodge a half-hearted protest.  The Obama administration holds our allies in contempt.  The administration loathes a free press.  They like the main stream media, as long as they are Obama-worshiping cheerleaders and not impartial referees.  But if Fox posts a critical story, the administration attacks them, and threatens to cut off access to top officials.  When the Associated Press found last week that the White House had overstated stimulus-created jobs by 5,000, the White House immediately attacked the wire service.   If a conservative commentator lambasts the administration, he is discredited, insulted, and prevented from engaging in his right to enter a bid on a football franchise.  Most of all, the Obama administration loathes America.  They despise its military power, so often used to defend against tyranny and aggression.  They are ashamed of its capitalistic system and economic strength, though both are inspirations for the world.  They dismiss the independent spirit, the individual liberty, and the unlimited opportunity that characterize the American dream.  Instead, they believe in an all-powerful state that redistributes wealth, picks winners and losers in the private sector, and takes over companies and entire industries by fiat.  The Obama team’s loathing for America becomes more evident every day, as more and more administration officials are shown to be involved in corrupt organizations like ACORN, sympathetic to or adherents of communism, or enablers of terrorists foreign and domestic.    The fear weapon also has a limited term.  Just as Al Gore’s shrieking alarms of global warming become less and less credible with passing time and lowering temperatures, so will all the dire predictions the Obama administration uses to run up massive debt, pass nationally destructive legislation, and appoint subversives to positions of power.  The case that only government can save us from catastrophe becomes harder to prove each day, as government itself is clearly shown to be the greatest danger we face.  When Americans become wary of their government, then the Obama administration will find that fear is a two-edged sword, and an irresistible motive for change.  Or so we hope.

0
Your rating: None

Comments

Government can give a sense

Government can give a sense of direction. If we look over the last 8 years, we have seen our jobs go overseas, our money going to Iraq, and the neglect of the infrastructure. So we lived what government can or will not do. Call it ignorance and arrogance. Call it whatever you want. Call it laissez-faire or call it that we are abiding by the constitution. 

Now I live in a town of 16,000 people and we lost 2000 manufacturing jobs. And it is no secret why the midwest voted for Obama. Now we are going to get an added 200 jobs and it is by the direction of government by Eisenhower. Yep, those 200 jobs will be on I 75 the corridor for distribution plants. So the Interstate saved the day for 200 people.  Now, we can invest in our country, in our people, and in the future. Or, we can continue with wars and borrowed money and neglect our country. In which, we can continue to bail out cities and states, cash for clunkers, extension of unemployment benefits, and casinos in every state.

China has building whole cities, has the largest airport in the world, the longest bridge, high speed rail, and they will be bringing in a car to the U. S. next year. They are also investing for their future. They are making contacts, buying up raw material, and using government money for research on batteries and whatever else. We have been losing ground for years, but some people think we should do nothing. That tax cuts is the only thing that is needed. Well, those tax cuts are spent and was borrowed money. So where do we go from here? We saw the trickle down and it will not trickle down to the lowest 20% or 30% of the population. And we stayed the course. And we saw a country run into the ground. 

We don't have to pick and choose winners and losers, but we do need to invest in future sciences with federal research grants. It is government that can give seed money for the future in which other investment capital will not do. It means jobs and growth, along with doing the usual of cutting government spending and all the right things to move a country forward. 

It seems like as of late, that republican presidents go towards foreign policy and neglect our country. As great as Reagan was, he put all his effort in winning the cold war, and rightly so. Bush, for most of his time in office was consumed by war. 

It is time to recognize that we have an economic war with China and other countries. It is time to address some issues that will not go away, or what is not covered in the 250 year old constitution. So, so far, I have not heard any adequate answers from republicans. It is just failed policy and failed ideology. 

 

picking winners and losers

Okay let's just pick one sentence from In Between's rant:

We don't have to pick and choose winners and losers, but we do need to invest in future sciences with federal research grants.

How, pray tell, is government supposed to pick which federal research grants to fund WITHOUT picking "winners and losers"?

 There are a lot of

 There are a lot of technology sectors to invest in. More than what I know. You give grant money to universities and corporations. Obama did it with a new battery plant in Michigan.

Energy Department awards auto battery grants | Green Tech - CNET News

We know we have to be energy independent for security reasons and for jobs. We know the first country that becomes energy independent will own the world. So this is one area. 

Who knows what will happen in the chip sector or the communication area. Also in medicine. 

The thing is to invest in your country. And if you don't then we lose. And that is what we are seeing today. 

The money can be sent to universities or to states and they know more than the government where to invest the money. 

I know conservatives do not like government, and there are plenty of horror stories on that. Even Japan built bridges to nowhere. But you cannot sit around and let China and other countries pick our country apart. We need jobs of the future as we get rid of the old. And as right now, there is no replacement for those jobs that went overseas. And that means people sitting on welfare and not paying taxes.

We have benefited from the government by building the Hoover dam, the interstate, the internet, and by putting the man on the moon. Everything goes through satellites and our government through all the research and along with many companies made it happen. All these things made our lives better. The NIH works on many drugs as well as pharmaceutical companies. There are failures along the way, but we also benefit with both the gains and failures. 

Instead of ideology from both parties, I find it does not hurt to invest in your country. We have to do something instead of nothing. And as I have said before, we are reduced to bailouts of cities and states, extension of unemployment benefits, cash for clunkers, and casinos for every state. We are paying a heck of a price for doing nothing.