The Enemy's Agenda

The Democrat Hydra

by  Lance Thompson

This nation has enemies of all kinds.  But imagine a generic enemy of the United States–any state, agency, organization or individual who would benefit from this country’s failure.  Then imagine what such an enemy would want for the United States.

The enemy would want our borders to be porous so that illegal entry into this country would be comparatively easy.  Further, the enemy would want the consequent flood of illegal aliens to drain our welfare, education and health systems; increase crime rates, clog the justice system and fill our prisons to overflowing; and to create a separate nation within our nation that has its own language, customs and identity separate from that of American citizens. Finally, he would want this illegal group to gain the rights of citizens and cast their votes against the legitimate interests of this country.

The enemy would want to subvert the very democracy that our nation is the symbol and champion of.  He would hope that our electoral process could be invalidated by disenfranchisement, fraud and corruption.  He would hope that Americans would lose faith in the democratic system, and, in the face of the repeated thwarting of popular will, to cease participation in the franchise entirely.

The enemy would like to see the checks and balances of the American government sabotaged.  He would like to see our Congress crafting laws in secret and concealing their excesses from scrutiny.  He would like to see the president fill his administration with officers tainted by unlawful acts and compromised by unsavory histories.  He would like to see our judicial branch filled with judges who legislate from the bench and who thwart the will of the people with arbitrary decrees.  He would additionally wish that oversight of these branches of government would be reduced or eliminated so their abuses could continue without interference. The enemy would know that this, too, would destroy the faith of Americans in their government and leaders.

The enemy would like to see this nation’s defenses dismantled.  He would like to see more and more laws that protect those who would destroy this country, and greater restrictions on those who defend it.  He would like to see this nation abandon its allies, withdraw from its strategic positions, and unilaterally surrender the initiative in the high ground of space to our foes.

The enemy would like to see the powerful market economy of this nation destroyed.

He would like to see the value of our stocks, retirement accounts and real estate tumble.  He would like our financial institutions to collapse.  He would like the mighty economic engine that is America hobbled by burdensome regulations and taxes, pseudo-scientific environmental restrictions, and adversarial government policy.  He would like to see private industry and public employers consumed by the cancer of ever more powerful unions.  And he would want to so increase the debt of the United States with irresponsible spending, out-of-control entitlements and incomprehensible monetary policy that our country would lose its place as the world’s most economically powerful nation.

All of these conditions are being created by the Democrats in the White House and Congress.  Democrats are the champions of illegal immigration.  Barack Obama’s campaign, as well as that of Al Franken and other Democrats, benefited from the aid of ACORN, a vote-manufacturing community group that was under criminal investigation in five states during the presidential campaign, and is now slated to get a multi-million dollar chunk of the stimulus bill.

The stimulus bill itself was crafted in secret, defended by lies, and rushed through the process without being shown to many Democrats, let alone any Republicans.  As Byron York recently pointed out, it contains provisions for a board that can terminate investigations by inspectors general into the executive branch.  And in almost a trillion dollars of new spending, the only significant cutbacks in the bill were in the areas of defense appropriations.

Liberal judges have released terrorists, murderers and child molesters and reversed the democratic will of the people by striking down initiatives from prohibitions on gay marriage to calls for English only ballots.  The new administration has appointed a terrorist sympathizer as attorney general, sprinkled tax evaders throughout the cabinet, and created the “culture of corruption” which was a phrase the Democrats themselves invented, and have now perfected.  Finally, the financial meltdown was caused by Democrats coercing banks to offer loans to those unable to repay them and Democrats blocking oversight of Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac.

Moderates on both sides are eager to grant the opposition the benefit of the doubt, and concede that those across the aisle have the best interests of the country at heart, even if their methods differ.  But when one party’s policies consistently support and achieve the aims of the enemy, then intentions are immaterial.  Only the results matter, and in the issues above, where Democrats have had their way, the results are always detrimental to the interests of the United States.

If we cannot use the term “enemy” for the leaders whose policies serve the needs and interests of the enemy, then perhaps we need a new term.  “Unenlightened co-conspirator” has a nice ring.  “New double-Dealer” has a retro flair.  We could save “disloyal opposition” for a more favorable balance in Congress.

But maybe we already have a term for politicians who abuse our system of government to deceive its citizens, drain its treasury, strip its defenses and undermine its foundations.  It starts with a “D’ and ends in “rat.”

http://www.lowdowncentral.com/feature-article/2009/2/24/the-enemys-agenda.html

0
Your rating: None

Comments

And they wonder why Republicans think

Bush's regime was a Kleptocracy or a Manchurian Scenario where the leaders of the Administration were dedicated to slowly destroying America from within.

Well, I've at least one Republican friend down on that side, at least.

Because your first five or so paragraphs aptly describe George's Corporatist reign, where King Henry was able to do whatever he pleased, in the service of his former and current masters of the universe.

Amazing 8 year blindspot

RisingTide pegged it. Up until the point where you first mention Democrats, your entire post could appear on DailyKos as a condemnation of the last administration without a single word being changed.

I was never big on Freud, but what we have here is projection as a defense mechanism.

and you wonder why my favorite poster on kos is a republican

Dr. David Brin -- his posts are priceless!

Let me guess...

...he's your favorite poster on Kos because he's not really a conservative yet he still calls himself a Republican, so you get to hear all the usual talking points as uttered from the rest of the Kos Zoo yet you get the additional warm and fuzzy feelings of appearing to 'listen to the other side'?

he's... an out of the box sort of thinker.

1. I like his reasoning on being a Republican. Shows a better knowledge of game theory than most folks.

2. He's actually helpful in coming up with relatively non ideological (or at least non-left/right) proposals for Congress -- and with an understanding that so long as he stays away from "third rail" issues, that he might be able to see a few implemented. http://www.davidbrin.com/suggestion.htm

3.  Who else posts links like this:

http://counterknowledge.com/2009/02/the-trouble-with-conspiracy-theories/

http://www.greencarcongress.com/2009/01/researchers-eva.html

http://www.whatarack.org/

4. It's awful nice to know someone with a few friends in interesting places. Brin talks about what he's learned from his -- and some of it is downright frightening.

Except there

You'd probably have quite a few posters calling the poster paranoid.

there, in all actuality, the writer would and does

admit that he's talking "tinfoil hat stuff"

And then we get to hear his rants on the destruction of America's military by GWBush, and conspiracy thoughts on why Bush sent osama's family back home and then lied about it...

the main difference, as far as I can tell, is that Brin at least does get invited to talk to Congress, and knows enough people from here and there to actually sound credible about the damage (if not his suspicions for what causes the damage)