"How Much" vs. "What Type" of Experience

*** UPDATE FROM THE FLOOR OF THE CONVENTION: 7 PM Central, 8 PM Eastern ***

Excerpts from Gov. Sarah Palin's speech tonight have been released. Here are two of my favorites:

"Before I became governor of the great state of Alaska, I was mayor of my hometown. And since our opponents in this presidential election seem to look down on that experience, let me explain to them what the job involves. I guess a small-town mayor is sort of like a 'community organizer,' except that you have actual responsibilities."

YES! But there's more...

"Here's how I look at the choice Americans face in this election. In politics, there are some candidates who use change to promote their careers. And then there are those, like John McCain, who use their careers to promote change."

I'm getting out the throat lozenges for all of the screaming I'll be doing in a couple hours.

--------------------

I'm sitting in a restaurant in the Ramada Mall of America hotel waiting for my reuben with fries. I'm finally catching up on all of yesterday's and today's news, and noticed that Barack Obama contended that he has more executive experience than Sarah Palin:

“Well, my understanding is that Governor Palin’s town of Wasilla has, I think, 50 employees. We’ve got 2,500 in this campaign. I think their budget is maybe $12 million a year. You know, we have a budget of about three times that just for the month. So I think that our ability to manage large systems and to execute I think has been made clear over the last couple of years.”

Really? Are you serious? Not only is it ridiculous that Obama thinks that running for president is the same thing as being president. It's fantastic that Democrats are now trying to defend their top of the ticket against our number two. The McCain campaign made good use of this today:

I, along with others from the Alaska delegation, have been bombarded by the press about ridiculous things like the various pregnancy theories, "big scandals" that really aren't, etc. The one thing that has been bugging me is the question of whether or not an Alaskan governor is ready to be VPOTUS and POTUS.

First of all, I've never really bought this whole argument of "being ready on day one." No one, no matter the experiences that any candidate has, is ready to be commander-in-chief, leader of the free world, and chief executive. Every president has to face very different challenges and is presented with very different opportunities. So to compare and contrast presidencies, and to use past presidencies as campaign material, is really a useless exercise. When I look at a candidate, I look at what type of experiences that candidate has gone through, and not the length of certain experiences.

Besides the personal experiences of John McCain and Sarah Palin, biographies that we've already heard and the American people are getting to know, let's talk about the political opportunities and challenges that Sarah Palin has gone through. As a city councilwoman and mayor, she cut property taxes. And as governor, she has championed modern ethics legislation. She's taken on big oil by deciding to restructure our state's oil & gas tax and deciding to go with an independent natural gas pipeline constructor. She's also worked with big oil to support offshore drilling, development of ANWR, and opposition of the listing of the polar bear on the endangered species list.

John McCain and Sarah Palin have called for and instituted change and reform, whether it was popular or unpopular. When has Obama or Biden had to fight against the wind?

Many reporters and pundits from the MSM have been very condescending towards Alaska, arguing that making decisions for a small town and a small-in-population state is not sufficient experience. I hope they keep on making that arguments, and in turn providing us small town voters from Wisconsin, Michigan, Ohio, Iowa and Pennsylvania. It's not about "where" you make decisions; it's about "how" you make decisions. Sarah Palin has provided a record of tough decision-making that impacts the lives of individuals that Obama and Biden can only wish for.

Finally, what about foreign policy and the apparent "lack thereof" from Sarah Palin? At first look, Alaska doesn't seem to be the center of the foreign policy world. But Palin has worked with international oil companies. Her administration manages one of the busiest cargo airports in the world. The National Guard that she is the commander-in-chief of manages the National Missile Defense system in Ft. Greely, Alaska. She has had several trade meetings with our East Asian partners. As one delegate put it, Alaska feeds America, supplies America, fuels America and defends America. Palin provides McCain a great opportunity to merge foreign and economic policies.

Sarah Palin might not know everything, but we don't need the "I-need-to-prove-I-know-more-than-you-do" candidates in Obama and Biden. Palin's ability to learn, and then lead, will be a fresh approach in the West Wing. So, I beg the MSM and the liberal blogosphere to keep on attacking ... and finally show their true elitist colors.

0
Your rating: None

Comments

Weak Tea

I'm sorry but this is a very weak defense.  Notice how you turn the issue of experience into qualitative measures.  This is extremely unconvincing especially since your qualitative measures are almost purely ideological.  For example, how does cutting property taxes have anything to do with experience, quantitative or qualitative?  Are you arguing that had she raised property taxes your measure of her experience would be less? 

 

 

This is a completely strong

This is a completely strong defense. Having office and doing something with it are two different things. While Obama has some experience, he doesn't have the kind of experience he's touting he'll bring to the Oval Office. He paints himself as an agent of change, but has never acted on it, despite the opportunity.

He's had a big opportunity to reform against the corrupt politics in Illinois and the U.S. Congress, but he hasn't done it. He keeps waiting for the Presidency.

Palin waited for nothing. She's gone after reform from Day 1, when no one cared about a small little town of Wasilla. And she's taken it right up to her Governorship of Alaska.

Quality is way more important than quantity when it comes to experience. It's disingenuous to suggest otherwise.

Your right because KT's argument is what is weak.

The fact that he would attack the idea od quantifying her actual serious attempts at reform by Gov. Palin shows just how desperate the Obama supporters have become.  They need to come up with something that discredits her while discounting her accomplishments.

Please

There are a lot of criteria, and suggesting that being mayor of a small town is equivalent to some of Obama's milestones is insulting.  Obama was president of Harvard Law Review, Summa cum Laude from Harvard Law, and taught consitutional law.  Palin doesn't bring much intellectual firepower to the table, has no legal training, and confessed she doesn't even know what the VP does.

And oh, Giuliani.  Sorry, but he is a hack, and a TERRIBLE public speaker.  The audience doesn't seem to know when to cheer and when to boo.  It's no wonder he didn't get any delegates after spending all that money.

Better issues, PLEASE, which are the economy, the war, the war, the war, and the economy.

Giuliani said that the Democrats didn't mention Islamic terrorism, which is a cheap shot, since they talked about national security but didn't use those exact words.  How about jobs moving overseas, the mortgage crisis, the very unpopular war (87% against now), the mounting national debt, and the ECONOMY?  Those are the issues that people care about, and the "experience" angle is seen as nothing more than style over substance. 

"Tax cuts" do not solve every possible problem, and somehow we need to PAY for things like, oh, WARS, but the American people have not been asked for any sacrifice like those made by my parents during WW II, and like I was asked for while serving in the Army during the Vietnam debacle.  PEOPLE WILL SUPPORT SOMETHING THEY SACRIFICE FOR, BECAUSE THEY HAVE A STAKE IN IT.

I shouldn't have to point that out.

I think these people are doing their best to throw the election.  Maybe some of them think they will get another shot in four years.

And here it is, another lefty defending the elitism of Obama.

I really care nothing for Harvard, and neither of the things you have mentioned about Obama make him qualified to even be president.  We don't need a legal scholar to ponder every minute detail when critical decisions needs to be made.

Now I know your probably a coward who hates conflict and will shy away from it in order to hopefully appease your enemies who happen to be violent and dangerous people judging from your ridiculous rant about war, your alleged military service notwithstanding.   Based on what you said, "PEOPLE WILL SUPPORT SOMETHING THEY SACRIFICE FOR, BECAUSE THEY HAVE A STAKE IN IT", then all I can ask you is well what the hell do you think convention theme has been about?

You are right that tax cuts don't solve all our problems but neither does government.  That is why we need less of it.  All the problems with the economy you mention are in some way the result of too much government in the economy not because of less government.