| About Us | Contact | Donate | User Blogs | Login |
Identifying Progress, No Matter How Small
On my own blog (www.kungfuquip.com) I have spent considerable digital ink discussing the things the GOP is doing wrong, and calling out the more egregious acts of folly in which the right's infrastructure engages.
For my inaugural post on this new outlet, I thought I'd take a closer look at some of the incremental steps I see in the right direction. A recent e-mail exchange with a colleague pointed out one such item I had overlooked - John McCain's "McCain Report".
While I still must point out some of the things I find awkward about McCain's blogs (not the least of which is that he has two of them that seem to compete with one another), I will note that Goldfarb's content seems to be vastly superior to what is ostensibly their flagship blog - titled simply the "McCain Blog".
The McCain Blog is largely the sort of press release and dull e-mail fodder we've come to expect from campaigns. It recaps the latest rally and pimps "new eco-friendly items" available in the McCain store. It gets updated every few days. The one upshot is they do allow discussion.
Goldfarb's McCain Report, on the other hand, is actually good. It's not full of PR fluff and cheerleading. It's updated several times a day and it contains substantive material. It is what campaign blogs should be (save for the fact that McCain should occasionally author posts, which he so far has not).
Take one recent piece triggered by a Ben Smith item in the Politico:
As Ben Smith reported yesterday, the Obama campaign recently brought Jason Furman on as a senior economic advisor. Smith notes that Furman wrote a lengthy defense of Wal-Mart in 2005, titled "Wal-Mart: A Progressive Success Story." In it Furman denies that Wal-Mart is suppressing wages, or exploiting their employees. The fact "that more than 1.3 million Americans work at Wal-Mart demonstrates that its compensation is at least as good as the alternatives," he says. And he adds that “the available data is consistent with the premise that Wal-Mart pays wages that are comparable to the retail sector.”
His new boss takes a different view. In 2006, Obama told Fortune that "Wal-Mart is making enormous profits, and yet it has chosen to go with low wages and diminished benefits." And in 2007, Obama told union members that he won't even shop at Wal-Mart because of their exploitation of American workers. Has Obama moderated his views on Wal-Mart or will Furman and he just agree to disagree?
That is far from the typical piece on the campaign's other blog:
Today, John McCain addressed the threat of global climate change and outlined his strategy to lead America to meet its obligations as a steward of this planet. The centerpiece of his plan is a market-based system designed to curb greenhouse gas emissions, mobilize innovative technologies, and strengthen the economy.
Be sure to watch the newest tv ad called, "A Better Way," then click here for more information on the McCain Plan.
I'm actually very pleased to see the McCain camp doing something well. In fact, what impresses me most is the superior quality of the McCain Report when compared to the Obama blog.
Senator Obama released the following statement today in response to the news of the trade deficit increase:
Today we learned that the trade deficit jumped to its highest level in 13 months. This is not an accident. This is yet another sign of the failed economic policies of the Bush administration that John McCain seeks to extend – policies that reflect unprecedented fiscal irresponsibility and borrowing from abroad. Rather than get America’s fiscal house in order, Senator McCain is proposing $300 billion more in tax breaks and loopholes for big corporations and the wealthiest Americans, and he hasn’t explained how he’d pay for them. Just this week, John McCain reaffirmed his commitment to special interest-driven economic policies that will widen the trade deficit, but won’t help American automakers secure fair treatment in South Korea, and won’t ensure that China stops devaluing its currency and tilting the playing field against American workers. As President, Barack Obama will stand up for fiscal responsibility by restoring fairness to our economy, investing in a renewable energy future, and adopting a trade policy that serves the interests not just of multinational corporations but of America’s hardworking families.
You can learn more about Barack's stance on trade here.
That is a stark contrast. The Obama team (vaunted as they are for their superior web skills) is running a dry boring blog, while McCain's team have at least begun to get it. It's nice to see.
(As a side note, I'd like to offer two suggestions to Team McCain. First, look into search engine friendly urls. Second, optimize the meta tags on your blog posts to actually include the specific content of the post. Especially with this new stuff critical of Obama, it's going to be important that people can actually find it.)
- MichaelTurk's blog
- Login or register to post comments


Comments
Obama's boring blog
The article fails to note that while politicians or their staffs are not the most profound bloggers on the web, each has surrogates in the form of the thousands of other political blogs that support their postiions. The page views on the other political blogs outnumber the page views on the candidates' blogs by thousands to one.
In that arena, the liberal blogs are ahead, and it is not clear what the conservative side needs to do to regain the lead we had and squandered a few years ago.
This blog is of course an attempt to reverse that tide, but we are a long way from matching the Great Orange Satan in terms of readership or influence.
Other blogs
That was the argument we used in 2004 to explain away the dull content (no offense, Patrick). The Democrats laughed at the Bush blog for its lack of flavor, yet praise the rehashed Obama version as brilliant.
Beyond that, though, it's sort of a chicken/egg argument.
Are candidate sites dull because there are so many other sources of information about the campaign? Or are there so many other sources because the campaign isn't giving supporters anything interesting?
These campaigns have research books hundreds or thousands of pages thick with material on the opposition. That's enough to provide at least a half dozen blog posts per day with good meaty stuff.
Compare that to even the best blogs that are lucky to come up with even a few compelling posts that get noticed.
Where should we be getting information about the candidate and the opponent if not from the guys who know the most about both?
The Moat
From my experience the reason a campaign doesn't put out more meaty material is the disconnect between the communications shop and the web staff. Most of the time communications is busy pushing stories to newspapers, tv, and radio. They should be spending as much time crafting great weblog posts, pushing them to the blogosphere, and hoping they bubble up to the MSM. In this day and age a campaign's weblogger should be in the communicaitons shop and let the web team build and maintain the online infrastructure.
Agree with your sentiment, not your conclusion
Your right that the problem is the communications shop, but I disagree completely with making the solution "give them more control over the mass message." Most corporations do not put their sales/marketing and media relations teams in the same place because they're completely different skills.
The fact that the Communications shop is in charge of the web is an antiquated holdover from the days when the website was "the place where we put our press releases." The average Communications director has no more experience or ability to run a new media program than the guy that cleans the building at night.
So let your Communications shop talk to the media all day long. Let them pimp surrogates to talk shows and try to get favorable coverage from reporters at the NY Times. That's what they do. However, if you want your message to resonate with the people, it will not originate in the same place as a message that resonates with Dana Milbank.
Most television advertising, radio, and direct mail is generated outside of the Comms shop with good reason. The web message should originate in the same place. As the broader themes of the campaign are developed for paid efforts, they should be reflected in online messaging - via blog outreach, online advertising, search terms, etc.
I've argued that campaigns should be resturctured so Comms becomes the corporate equivalent of media and investor relations. Your political shop becomes your Sales team. Microtargeting, strategy, traditional media, and new media should be your Marketing team.
Going by experience
The best communicators I've encountered were in the comms shop. But then again I've encountered comms people who cringe at the thought of having to give a reporter a quote.
Since a lot of campaigns is about titles your restructuring could be encouraged by blatantly naming a Chief Marketing Officer, Chief Sales Officer, etc and letting them build from there.