| About Us | Contact | Donate | User Blogs | Login |
McCain's Move
With less than one month to go, John McCain has few winning moves, and Barack Obama is headed to "Check Mate" on the chess board of Election 2008.
What is McCain to do?
Two McCain advantages remain. And they are true advantages, not bloated attacks on Obama or overused GOP talking points.
1. Senate Record
One reason the voting public distrusts and dislikes politicians is that politicians fail to follow through on election promises. For fence-sitting voters, especially those bombarded by campaign ads and phone calls, it's hard to believe either candidate will do what they say.
With two Senators at the top of each party's ticket, the candidate's disadvantage is the public's advantage -- a record by which to evaluate each candidate, to predict how they will perform in office.
Obama claims he will give 95% of taxpayers a tax cut. He claims that he will reach across the aisle and find compromise solutions to our nation's challenges. He claims he will move us closer to energy independence. He claims he cares about Main Street and will hold Wall Street accountable. But what has he done while in the Senate to achieve these goals? One look at Obama's past votes and legislative behavior, and it's clear his campaign promises are inconsistent with his record reality.
And what about the "Present" votes while in the Illinois State Senate. What kind of commitment did that show?
McCain's must be accountable to a much longer record, but it's one that is consistent with the domestic and foreign policy agendas outlined on the campaign trail. When it comes to reaching across the aisle, as Mike Murphy said on Meet the Press today, "You look at any piece of bipartisan legislation in the Senate that got done the last five years, John McCain's been the quarterback ... McCain is a guy who can get things done in Washington with two parties."
2. Runaway Liberal Agenda
Also on MTP today, Murphy referred to the "runaway Democratic train" that comes with an Obama presidency.
How many moderates and independents would prefer a Congress to have limits, the checks and balances so cleverly built into our political system? With Congress' abysmal approval rating, scary is the thought of a liberal Democratic president putting forth an agenda that Congress will ratify quickly and easily.
With a liberal and a moderate as our choices, even left-leaners may consider a moderate out of fear of the reckless decisions made possible by a Congress who says "Yes, We Can" to every proposal the liberal president desires.
(McCain should take care in presenting this as a problem with an Obama presidency. Voters don't like hand-wringing and demagoguing either. Nonetheless, McCain can stand on his record as someone who forces compromise, which is better than forcing unchecked bad policy.)
McCain must try these two moves now ... or never.
- mindyfinn's blog
- Login or register to post comments


Comments
point 2 kind of negates point #1
Obama will have little need for bipartisanship as he drives the runaway train of the dem agenda, although he may need some intrapartisanship to keep the fiscal conservative / blue dog democrats on board.
As so often happens Mccains potential advantage - voters fearing dems overreaching has its shadow. I have often wondered how Mccain would get his agenda of more trickle down reaganomics passed by a dem congress. When Bush passed the tax cuts the GOP was in the majority. Dems have a history of getting rolled on foreign policy and national security issues, but I don't think it would happen on any of Mccains domestic agenda - tax cuts, energy, privatizing Soc sec., healthcare. A Mccain administration almost ensures gridlock.
So, what you're saying is McCain is toast
Because these "advantages" are thin gruel.
This is a change election; the wrong track number is off the charts. #2 says: vote for McCain because Obama will change too much. McCain has not persuaded on change. His pitch is all process -- bipartisan, maverick -- with little substance. I don't think he's really engaging the voters on the issues.
Unfortunately, as the campaign seems to be indicating will be their approach, making Obama appear unacceptable as a person is the only tactic they have that will actually change votes over the next 4 weeks. Will it be enough?
We had gridlock during the Reagan and most of the Clinton era
and I think the public was more satisfied with the policy results. Empirically, they've turned hard against monoparty control of government (1994; 2006).
John McCain ought to run as "the man who will tell Congress no".
.
McCain's only hope...
...is to go in a direction that is repugnant to him. And to most in the GOP Hierarchy to include his elitist advisers who do not earn their pay. Its time to take out the bottle labeled "Populism" and measure out a full tablespoon, mix it in. Stir profusely. I know many on this board won't agree. But it is the populace that has what we want - and that is votes.
McCain has allowed the Obama camp to pull him away from certain "hot button" issues that Middle America wants in the forefront. 2 of those issues are Oil/Energy/Drill Now and Illegal Immigration.
If McCain would zero in on these 2 issues. Regarding domestic drilling, he should shift the emphasis to the number of jobs that this would bring. High paying jobs. And he should pose the question, "why are democrats standing in the way of high paying jobs for U.S. workers?" He should stop attacking the oil companies. They employ millions of Americans. Those millions vote.
Immigration - he and Palin really need to come out hard against employers who hire illegals and promise swift and ruthless action against them, if elected. Steer clear of any action against the illegals themselves - concentrate on those who give them jobs. Point to the damage being done to legit U.S. workers ie lower wages, etc. Palin and he need to visit the border areas. Point out that if Obama is elected, the border will swing wide open. We all know that will happen.
The huge problem w/the McCain camp is that they are allowing the msm and the dems dictate where this battle is being fought. We have the option of choosing our own battlefield with the sun at our backs and in the eyes of our opponent. Darvin Dowdy
agree
I think you are completely correct. I'm sure Sarah Palin would do it, but what are the odds that McCain will allow it? In my opinion, he just doesn't have it in him.
My only hope for McCain, Rohan...
...is that somewhere inside of him, the thought of losing ..... well do you remember the Patton speech at the start of the movie? That! I think its there - inside of him. This is his last chance. He'll have no more opportunities. The thought of losing has to disgust him. Don't you think? He can stay with these esoteric values that he's learned over time from someone else or he can go with his gut instincts. Go on the attack. "Use their guts to grease the treads of our tanks" or something like that.
Well any way, here's the Patton speech from the movie. It gets me motivated. I must to listen to this at least once or twice a month:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YDecLiA_Qbw
This is very true!
We haven't had "monoparty" very long periods of monoparty control since the end of the New Deal. The 2000-2006 period was the longest since 1960-1968. I know if McCain wins unfortuantely in many ways it will be a victory for the Democrats, but his running against monoparty control might have some appeal to those who aren't comfortable with one party having all the reigns.
That being said ,if Obama were to win, I predict no more than 2-4 years of monoparty control. The far-left fringe that has dictatorial control of the party will have free reign to screw the American people until they get chane to say something about it.
respectfully disagree...
...the dem's will do everything within their power to make sure they never lose power again. Or at least for decades to come. All the way down to the state and local level. Down to dog catcher. They'll have 2 or maybe 4 years to do some extreme gerrymandering in every state. They'll make it legal for felons and non-us citizens to vote. They'll build an artificial voting base to equal the GOP's legit voting base. They'll break the law if they have to do so. They're not to be trusted. This is not the Democratic Party of our Fathers or Grandfathers. These are a collection of U.S. hating socialists who hate our Constitution and want to turn it into a "living document" that can mean what they want it to mean.
If BO wins and the dem's win both houses, the only thing protecting us, other than the Good Lord will be 4 supreme court justices. Losing is really not an option, my opinion. DD
Exactly, and Well Said
With four weeks to go, he needs to pick a message and stick to it.
This message of "McCain will tell Congress no" could appear tough to sell, given the anxiety caused by the failure of the first bailout plan. However, its a message that resonates with the American people, and both parties, who detest Congress.
Also, the probability is the bailout will not be center stage a week from now, and the focus will shift. It'll be time for the candidates to talk about what they will cut from the government given the narrative that the taxpayers are now $700 billion poorer.
McCain is in a much better place to talk about how he will stop the spending bleed. He has a record to stand on. Spending is an issue on which conservatives, moderates, and independents agree.
If someone like Obama can get
If someone like Obama can get elected it represents a complete change in the character of America. It means that the the majority of the voting public has embraced socialism and defeat. If they remain in power then our country is finished, period.
The jackals around the world will recognize our newfound weakness and exploit it for all it is worth. Expect more wars, violence, shortages of all things, and loss of hope in the future.
Not a pretty thought, but I bet I'm right, unfortunately.
Threat of social democracy a viable issue for McCain
The slide towards a social democracy ought to be a huge hot button for independent and undecided voters as well as all conservatives. Graphic examples of how our country would change will hammer it home. Sounds like a job for a 527.