| About Us | Contact | Donate | User Blogs | Login |
Trust, Not Change
Is our country more concerned about change, or trust?
One might conclude that with McCain's recent insurgence in the polls, he is winning the change game. Yet, are the voters who have moved to McCain -- since the choosing of Sarah Palin for VP -- convinced that he will bring about more change?
Or do they like the air of authenticity that the ticket embodies vs. the urban, blue-blood, highly polished, Washington-insider ticket of Obama-Biden?
I propose that voters' "change"-ing opinions of John McCain have to do with the likeability of Sarah Palin. Her small town values and family life, and a "you go girl!" response to her mastery of unexpected challenges, win over voters. Not just because she's a woman, but also because she's not an Ivy-league educated CEO or lawyer from the glamorous regions of America.
The undecided Midwest -- suburban and rural -- voters can trust Sarah Palin (she's real), and thus trust McCain by association.
Compare the McCain-Palin ticket then to the Obama-Biden ticket. The majority of American voters are likely to gravitate towards the service to country ideals more closely aligned with the Midwest and West, the ideals summed up in the "Country First" theme recently touted by the McCain campaign. Compare that to the lack of understanding, and even fear, that most Americans feel towards the self-serving inner-city and inner-Congress wheeling and dealing associated with the Northeast and big cities.
Simply, McCain is from Arizona and Palin is from Alaska; Barack Obama is from Chicago, Illinois and Joe Biden is from Delaware. McCain began his adulthood by risking his life many times for the security of our country. Obama began his career in Harvard Law School and then spent a few years as a "community organizer;" he's on his way to career politician-hood.
Palin did not attain political success due to overt political ambition. She had pure intentions of serving her family and community, and then her town and her State. She is a "real" person. Biden, by comparison, has spent nearly his entire adulthood as a member of the most exclusive club in the nation: the U.S. Senate.
Fair or not, the perceptions Americans have of the two presidential tickets are accurate ... because they are the perceptions of the two presidential tickets.
With trust in government at an all-time low, which bona fides are more Americans inclined to place their faith in?
I’ve heard time and again from women regarding McCain's pick of Palin that it's quite "presumptuous" of McCain to count on women to “vote for Palin just because she's a woman."
Ok. So these women, from metropolitan areas outside Washington, DC, Chicago, Houston, Boston and Los Angeles don't need to vote for her. Most of them wouldn’t have voted for McCain anyway.
Yet, if women, and men (yes, they like her too!), from the Midwest and West are more enthusiastic about McCain, and if they turn out rather than sit out, it’s all over. Make room for McCain-Palin in the White House.


Comments
Read my mind!
Daniel Schur of Westborough Mass - "That's one thing people from the East Coast and West Coast forget -- how many people live in the middle of the country." - ABC News The Note
This is an issue that the Obiden camp has to face -- the real American electorate. Can OBiden go to Michigan or Wisconsin and have their message really resonate with the voters?
Also calling Palin stupid, yeah that's going to work real well with undecided women!
You didn't hear anyone whinging when women said they were voting for Hillary because she's a woman!
Trust?
I grew up in a rural and suburban place in a very red state. Distrust of people from big cities was a common thing. These folks didn't like "city slickers." They were very suspicious of people from New York or Chicago or Los Angeles. I think it was a deep seated resentment because of their own insecurity about their level of sophistication. They feel inferior because they come from a small place (they shouldn't) and they resent those who do not. People are afraid of people who are different. The big city and city people can be a scary place for those who are unfamiliar.
After moving to the city and living in cities for 10 years now, I found this fear totally irrational. Good people come from cities too. Their struggles and challenges are not much different. Their values are not much different. In fact. They are the same. They all believe in some version of the American Dream. This anti-snobbery is the new snobbery in this nation. I'm here to tell you that it's wrong for the McCain/Palin campaign to capitalize on and play lip service to these insecurities and it should be condemned.
I also find it unsettling that people from my part of the country want to support a candidate just because they are more comfortable with them on a personal level. The election should be about merit and about who has the best plan to tackle the problems we face as a nation. I don't want the guy who I'd have a beer with running the free world. I want the guy who's the smartest, brightest, and most inspiring leader to lead us into the future. A Harvard education is a good thing. Graduating with honors is a good thing. No, it's a GREAT thing.
Having said that, I don't want an "average hockey mom" to be our Vice President. No offense to hockey moms. Yet, this is the second most important job in the world. For example, if you had to have a major surgery, would you want it performed by an "average" doctor? What if you found out that he had graduated 4th from the bottom of his class (McCain)? Heck no. You'd want the best, brightest, and most skilled doctor. Not knowing what the "Bush doctrine" means in a interview or that Fannie Mae is a private company is a pretty serious inadequacy for a major candidate. Wake up people. There's a reason why they aren't allowing Palin to take questions from the media. It's because she doesn't know anything. She's clueless! There's no excuse for this. And we're going to trust Sarah Palin to lead our nation if McCain is unable? They must think we're stupid! C'mon folks!
I think a candidate should also be measured by how they run their campaign. If we want to talk trust, we could talk about McCain's campaign ads. Even Rove said they were dishonest in an interview with Fox News. Rove admitting a campaign ad is dishonest?! Now THAT'S a statement. Should we trust a candidate who issues outright lies in their campaign?
Some people I know don't trust Obama because he's different. When asked, they can't say why. They just say, "I just don't trust him." (These people are all white by the way.) This is pure xenophobia. It's an irrational fear of people who appear foreign. Please people. See past the fear. Make a brave choice. You can do it.
Remember folks. Jesus was a community organizer. Pontius Pilate was a governor. For the Republicans, especially Guliani, to belittle Obama for his charitable work after law school was despicable. They failed to even mention his 8 years in the state senate or over 1000 days in the US Senate.
There was another lawyer and progressive thinker from Illinois who was criticized during his campaign for not having enough experience. His name was Abraham Lincoln.
Oh God here we go again with these stupid stereotypes.
Please quit trying to spin our distrust of Obama nad his phony "change and hope" campaign. I swear they stole that line from a 2004 Southpark episode where their was an election between douchebag and turd sandwich.
For the record Reagan was a governor, Charles Manson was a community organizer. FDR was a governor and Al Capone was a community organizer. Do you see the ridiculousness
of this bad analogy. Jesus was rabbi who rpfessed to be the Son of God, Pontius Pilate was not a democratically elected figure but someone appointed by the conquering Romans. He also made the ultimate vote of present by refusing to say no to crucifixition of Jesus even though he knew man had done no wrong and didn't support it.