| About Us | Contact | Donate | User Blogs | Login |
Does Mitt Romney Want to Be Vice President?
Mitt Romney has been popping up everywhere lately and remains one of the most discussed candidates for Vice President. Romney himself has been notably less than Shermanesque in disclaiming his ambitions for the VP slot.
This is puzzling because Romney shouldn't want to be McCain's veep. And it's quite possible that he actually doesn't.
I find all the breathless speculation about the VP on both sides actually kind of silly. Historically, the Vice Presidents -- and especially failed Vice Presidential candidates -- don't get elected President. The pretty big caveat in here is that they can succeed into the office at any time through death or resignation, and this has historically been the main pathway into the Oval for VPs.
When George Bush was elected in 1988, people remarked that a "curse" had been broken. The last #2 to manage election in his own right was Martin Van Buren in 1836. And remember who they succeeded: Andrew Jackson and Ronald Reagan, two of the great realigning figures in American history.
The track record of losing VP candidates is even worse. John Edwards. Joementum. Jack Kemp (who didn't run again). Dan Quayle. Walter Mondale. Bob Dole managed to get nominated, but on the back of his recent Senate leadership, not his VP candidacy 20 years earlier. The last failed Vice Presidential candidate to be elected President was Franklin D. Roosevelt. He had been the Vice Presidential candidate in 1920, but here again, his political identity was that of Governor of New York.
Mitt Romney is already in line to be the nominee in 4 years if McCain loses under the GOP Law of Primogeniture. Why would he want to muck it up with a VP run? If McCain loses, it is all downside for Mitt. People would forget all the positive aspects of his Presidential run and remember his role on a losing ticket. (See Edwards, John.)
And even if McCain wins, Romney would face a tough road getting elected in his own right. Republicans are already facing voter exhaustion after 8 years in power. Could they win a third or fourth consecutive election even if they manage to pull it out in '08? The possibility grows progressively unlikelier. It is very likely that McCain still harbors thoughts of serving one term, setting up his VP as his natural successor. If McCain were a successful President, it would be a lot easier to re-elect him than transfering his brand to a VP, always a dodgy proposition (just ask Al Gore). The Democrats would have an even more compelling argument for "change" in 2012.
I have to assume that Romney knows his history, and knows that he is already in pole position for the nomination under the likeliest scenario, a McCain loss (calling them as I see 'em, folks).
Why does he seem to be lobbying for the job then?
Because it can be quite advantageous to be talked about as a potential Vice President without getting the nod. VP buzz is what separates promising future candidates from the pack of senators and governors. The reason the majority of the GOP base knows Bobby Jindal isn't because of his remarkable personal narrative or throwing the bums out in Louisiana. It's because he gets talked about for VP.
John F. Kennedy threw his name into contention for VP in 1956. If he'd actually gotten it, he probably wouldn't have been the nominee, but getting buzz and leaving the party hungry for more was the perfect setup for his Presidential campaign.
John Edwards was actually Joe Lieberman's runner-up for the VP slot in 2000 and this got people talking.
And John McCain was not Bob Dole's VP in '96, but was constantly at his side and traveled on the plane the last few weeks of election. This earned him some political chits and set up his 2000 run.
The lesson here is that if you're going to run in your own right, you're better off as the nominee's BFF not VP.
VP buzz gets Romney headlines and speaking engagements around the country without being overshadowed and having to share in the downsides of an uphill Presidential campaign. But it's still unlikely he would get picked because of the questionable personal chemistry between the two men, and Romney has to know this. But as a high level surrogate, Romney gets to travel around the country making the case for McCain better than McCain himself and leaving the base hungry for more.
Best case scenario: After November people say "If only McCain had picked Romney..."


Comments
good points
Good points about the VP choice -- I've been thinking that whoever McCain picks would end up being the 'natural successor' and all that. The first election I was really aware of was Bush in '88, so with that and then Gore in '00 my personal experience has shown that VPs can do well, so it's interesting to see the facts to the contrary. :)
I still don't want McCain to pick Huckabee though.
Of course, the Law of Primogeniture isn't a lock or
Pat Buchanan would have been the GOP nominee in 2000.
Believing that Republicans will pick the next nominee from Sen. McCain's 2008 pimary opponents is like thinking the Democrats should have gone back to the, "Seven Dwarves," Dukakis was picked from to choose their candidate in 1992. The lot of them were weak-links (after all, they got beat by McCain) and if the GOP can't field someone new in 2012 they will and deserve to lose that election as well. But this fact is so glaring there is no doubt in my mind that several new candidates will dominate the next contest.
And McCain COULD win this election. I don't think that would be very good for the GOP and Republicans wouldn't run Congress for another 40 years, but it could happen.
To know the real skinny on a politician you have to look at what they do, not what they say. I'll confess that I voted for Mr. Romney in the CA primary after months of hearing that hack Hugh Hewitt shill for him endlessly, but the enthusiasm for his candidacy is/was just mind-boggling to me. As they say, "the Apple doesn't fall far from the tree." If you want to know what makes Gov. Romney tick you have to look at what he DID as Gov. of Mass. Which means, yes, he is Pro-Life on abortion, but no, he's not a conservative. He's his father.
The track record for Veep nominees isn't good, you're right about that. But in the end, it won't make a difference for Mitt Romney.
I'm guessing that only cyberpunk Republicans will get this, but
when I saw the words "primogeniture" and "Romney" together, the first thought that popped into my head was ~ Romney: Ventrue Primogen.
Next thought ~ Obama: Assamite Primogen.
Nosferatu is so tempting, but I finally settled on ~ McCain: Brujah Primogen because he's such a warrior/idealist.
Now I'm going to have nightmares all night long. Either that, or I won't be able to sleep until I go to our local VTM LARP in (One World by Night) after my project is finished. I've got to dress up as ~ Cindy McCain: Toreador. Heh...
Romney is VP, McCain pulls a
Romney is VP, McCain pulls a Tim Russert, and Romney becomes the country's saving grace.
Why?
There is one step above finishing 2nd in the previous contested primary season; a sitting/former VP. Moreover, unless Mike Huckabee gives up his delegates before the convention, there will be some confusion as to who is next in line.
As for Buchanan, that is a special case. The 1992 primaries weren't exactly hotly contested, as Buchanan failed to carry a single state. Hence, that Law gave the nod to Bob Dole (who finished 2nd and took
45 states in 1988). Buchanan chose to leave the GOP in 1999 rather than take the mantle of "next in line" in 2000.Interesting take on the line of succession.
Actually, Pat Buchanan won the Louisiana Caucuses, came in 2nd in Iowa, and won the New Hampshire primary in 1996, in part due to his fame in taking on the elder Bush in '92 (in which, you're right, Buchanan won no states against the President). But even after Dole won in S.C. Buchanan maintained a solid 2nd place consistently earning better than 1/3rd of the vote. Nothing all that unique about this, other than he'd never held elected office before running.
Then he came in something like 9th in Iowa's 2000 Straw poll in Aimes so he had to find a new audience. But the point remains valid, primogeniture isn't a lock. McCain's nomination emerged from a cast of political weaklings. If someone else can't best Romney in 2012, it will President Obama for 8, not 4 years.
Romney Would Be A Bad Choice For McCain
I think Romney wants to be McCain's VP because he thinks McCain's going to win. Romney knows that in 2012 he can't run in a primary against McCain, so this is his best shot to become the next heir to the nomination. In 2016, Romney will be a distant memory.
I think Romney would make a good President, but would be a drag on McCain's ticket. Romney is portrayed as being loved by the conservative base, but if anything I would argue McCain's past is more conservative than Romney's. All you have to do is look at a few YouTube clips from a few years ago to see that Romney was willing to say anything to get elected, including at times running to the left of his Democrat rivals. For the Republican Presidential primary, it meant he had to transform himself into Ronald Reagan. Some conservatives ate it up, but I remain skeptical. I have a hard time believing you go from Massachusetts RINO to Reagan in two years.
Romney also has the baggage of being a venture capitalist (worth around $100 million) that would routinely go into businesses and lay off people in order to make the company profitable again. Ted Kennedy really made some hay out of this in the Senate election. In tough economic times, Americans aren't going to connect with the guy who gives out the pink slips at work in order to boost the company's stock price. Economic conservatives understand the value in this role, but your average swing voters is going to be turned off.
There's also the Mormon issue, which isn't fair, but it will be a factor that works against us. I've been amazed how many Christians think electing Romney somehow legitimizes Mormon theology. If even a small amount of religious voters are turned off at our ticket, we're doomed.
McCain should pick Palin as VP. She would get an enthusiastic reception among the conservative base, and would bring a lot of women voters to McCain. To me it's a no-brainer if she wants the job.
VP is no curse
What curse? what about Teddy Roosevelt, Richard Nixon and Harry Truman? Plenty of VPs end up as President eventually.
Michigan, Michigan, Michigan
If some replacement for Russert writes that on an easel election night McCain would wish Mitt was the running mate
Would Romney Make Much Difference?
I would respectfully disagree that Romney on the ticket would mean McCain wins Michigan.
Romney's only real claim to winning that state is that his dad was governor there nearly 40 years ago. I can't see the fact that McCain's VP's "dad" was Governor of Michigan in the 1960's changing one person's vote.
He also won Michigan's primary, after he promised (pandered) billions in taxpayer subsidies to help the auto industry. A promise he won't be able to deliver, or get support from McCain. (BTW, Is anyone noticing a pattern that he'll say anything to get elected whenever it suits him?) He goes from being an economic conservative to offering a" FDR New Deal" type plan, just to win one primary.
The only real plus I see for Romney on the ticket would be money, but with McCain taking matching funds, I'm not sure how much of a factor that will be.
McCain could do a lot better than Romney. Someone like Rob Portman, Tom Ridge, or my favorite, Sarah Palin would all be better picks that could make the difference this election. I think Romney would hurt McCain's chances more than anything.
winning isn't everything
but only one person won the MI primary, however it was accomplished.
I did not back Mitt in the primaries since he was too malleable, but malleability is sorta an asset for a VP candidate
As for pandering to MI, I think maintaining a domestic auto industry is more important than ethanol subsidies, farm subsidies and mortgage banking bailouts, all concepts most of the DC GOP are heartily in favor of .
Mitt 's not my first choice, but for one state only he is far from my last.
Forget who said this...
but it was someone on NRO (I'm just lazy). Anyway, the point was that picking Romney over McCain was picking the lesser of two evils--and I don't like the idea of choosing both for the GOP ticket. Whomever that was, I agree 100%.
Great Article
I am one that doesn't understand politics as well as I would like. But I enjoyed this article as it clearly explained the authors viewpoint and backed it with events in history. This helped me understand the political system a little better. Thanks for the article.