Good Questions to Vote for in the ATR Debate

Tomorrow is the RNC candidates debate hosted by ATR. You can submit your question for the candidates and vote here.

Perhaps not surprisingly, Ron Paul activists have voted up the majority of questions con the site. Most of these questions deal not with the vital and necessary goal of getting more Republicans who supported Ron Paul involved in the process, but on policy questions like eliminating the Federal Reserve, Austrian economics, the Fair Tax and the 2nd Amendment that the RNC Chairman has absolutely no jurisdiction over.

Whether it's Ron Paul Republicans or movement conservatives or moderates, my message to all is one and the same: the RNC is not a policymaking body -- nor should it be. It cannot make Republicans in Congress spend less, worthy a goal as that might be. The RNC's job is to win elections -- period. That means the RNC is made up of good political people -- not policy wonks -- who with all due respect, you wouldn't want making policy.

All the candidates for RNC Chairman are good conservatives. RNC members should choose the one who will win elections. As I've written over the last few days, technology, strategy, and tactics are not the only things -- and success in these areas is inextricably linked to having a Republican message "we can believe in."

That said, technology, strategy, and tactics ARE an outsized concern of anyone leading a political committee like the RNC, and so it's important we probe the candidates on these matters. If you want to ask the powers-that-be about what the GOP's philosophy should be, ask John Boehner, Mitch McConnell, and the Republican governors.

Below the fold are the top 10 questions that are relevant to the job of RNC Chairman, including some Ron Paul questions and a question about the authenticity of our small government message. I will be voting all of these up and encourage you to do the same, regardless of whether you agree with the specific angle the questioner is taking. I will also be exercising my right to vote down any questions that are not relevant to the job of RNC Chairman, ensuring a 2 vote swing from irrelevant to relevant questions. I went through every question for about 10 pages to generate this list.

In light of the success of the Ron Paul presidential campaign attracting large numbers of young activists to the conservative cause, what specifically will you do to ensure they become Republicans?

-- Jon Seehusen

Bailouts, senior prescriptions, No Child Federal school governance...Please explain how the GOP-brand effectively stands for "smaller, less intrusive government" today, and your plans to restore that brand.

-- BrianB

Having been a lifelong Republican for over 30 years, and having participated since the last election cycle at the precinct committee officer level of Republican party politics I am gravely concerned that the Republican Party is soley interested in running candidates who have paid their dues, so to speak, instead of supporting/running the right candidate for the right moment running on the right issues/message at the right location, i.e candidates who can win races. ...

-- Blonduxo (goes on to be a Ron Paul question, but these concerns are very valid)

While many people in the party have spoken about the importance of young voters, few have offered concrete plans on how to work from within the RNC to attract young voters back to our party. What, specifically, would you do to make the Republican Party an attractive option for voters 18-29 years old? Please include any ideas you have for specific programs, policy initiatives, or organizational restructurings you would commit to as RNC Chairman.

-- Charlie Smith

What will you do as RNC Chairman to ensure there is no self-dealing among RNC staff and consultants and as part of efforts to mitigate consultant self-dealings will you commit to legitimately bidding out all of the RNC's vendor contracts for mail, phone banking, and GOTV programs?

-- Erick Erickson

Considering the Institutional advantage Democrats enjoy in the educational system and at the collegiate level, Republicans have to work even harder than Democrats to attract the youth vote. What strategies would you employ to spread the Republican message to young people, and to promote the party as an organization they would want to associate with?

-- Locke

As chairman of the RNC, will you pledge to keep the party OUT of primaries and not endorse or oppose any primary contender either publicly or privately; publicly vet federal candidates based on the standard of the party platform and the U.S. Constitution; and open the party back up to ALL conservatives, even those who might disagree with some elected officials' policies?

-- ProfG

What is your vision for the technology necessary for our future and what steps will you take to make sure the RNC and the Republican Party compete with the most current technology available in the future?

-- Sharon Day

I am a contributor to the blog HipHopRepublican.com in the past the Republican Party was seen as the party for civil rights and equal opportunity. Today when people think of Republicans they see the party as belonging only to white people. Whether this accusation is fair or not it is a view shared by thousands of Americans. How will the new RNC Chair person specifically address these concerns and what specific tools will it use to improve its outreach to Latino, Asian and African American communities?

-- Terrence

What three issues do you think conservatives can rally behind and can be used to defeat liberals in the 2010 election?

-- Slick3627

1
Your rating: None Average: 1 (2 votes)

Comments

Patrick you're in deep denial ...

" The RNC's job is to win elections -- period."

The GOP is lost and without a compass. How can it, in that condition, win elections?  There comes a time (and the time is now) when the RNC must re-evaluate. Analyze.  Not only themselves but their "customers"! The Base!  Business's do this all the time.  The smart business's survey their customers to see if they (the biz) are aligned with what the customer wants.  They have to examine the GOP plank, policies and actions to try and get their bearing. That is if they even know they're lost.   The GOP/RNC continues to operate detached from the Base.  As if the GOP Base is really a nuisance to be brushed aside.

Regarding the prize for best question. The Norquist book.  Not a suitable reward, in my view.   Norquist has fought hard to keep the southern border wide open. Porous.  A plentiful flow of cheap, illegal labor pouring into this country.  And then then there's this:  ( link ) Norquists connection to radical Wahabbism.  This is one of the individuals that I've been posting about that needs to be "purged" from any GOP influence.  He can vote GOP if he chooses but that should be the extent  of his influence within the party. Darvin Dowdy

Also, regarding the PaulPods...

...when will we stop being so timid in dealing with this collection of anti-semites, holocaust deniers and white supremacists?  Here's some good links:

Michael Medved:  http://michaelmedved.townhall.com/blog/g/77711671-de32-47da-a721-8f606d586ad0

Am Thinker: http://www.americanthinker.com/2007/11/the_ron_paul_campaign_and_its.html

Lets call them what they are. They have zero credibility and should be totally ignored or even deleted.

DD

 

Wrong permalink

Patrick - the actual permalink for my suggestion is http://www.rncdebate.org/index.php?search_type=questionid&search_term=61

Pat, this is about the silliest post...

-- no, make that the most dangerous post ... I have read from you in a very long time.

Whether it's Ron Paul Republicans or movement conservatives or moderates, my message to all is one and the same: the RNC is not a policymaking body -- nor should it be. It cannot make Republicans in Congress spend less, worthy a goal as that might be. The RNC's job is to win elections -- period. That means the RNC is made up of good political people -- not policy wonks -- who with all due respect, you wouldn't want making policy.

If the Republican Party can't make policy, why bother creating a political platform?

What's the political point of winning elections if the people you elect don't support your party's political platform once in office?

If we don't have a strong policy-making party, who is going to keep the supposedly elected "Republicans" we elected Republicans?  Without such a political body present, Congress, as it has so vividly shown with the Wall Street bailout debacle, will always act to protect its own interests, its own political exposure, at the expense to the country's interests...always.

All the candidates for RNC Chairman are good conservatives. RNC members should choose the one who will win elections. As I've written over the last few days, technology, strategy, and tactics are not the only things -- and success in these areas is inextricably linked to having a Republican message "we can believe in."

How do you know all of the candidates for RNC Chairman are good conservatives if the political platform to which they pledge to support is meaningless?

Pat, how in hell are we supposed to arrive at a Republican message "we can believe in" if  the party can't make policy TO BELIEVE IN?

What you are saying to the members of the party is, "Look, little people, just sit back and make your donations when we ask you to and leave the thinking to us."  I am sorry, Pat, that's not the type of Republican Party I can believe in and it is certainly not a party that is going to win elections.

But most of all, Pat, I am deeply saddened that you, of all people, haven't seen the political challenge the Internet represents to our democracy and to the Republic itself. Without a strong, policy-making party, empowered by the Internet, there will be no organized opposition left strong enough to tell the Internet empowered candidates they are taking the wrong course, no organized opposition left strong enough to articulate the right course.  The Internet will be used not as a tool to allow the Peoples' voice to speak in our democracy, but as a tool to silence it.

Lastly, Pat: Do you support the Resolution?

ex animo

davidfarrar

Two observations

Mr. Farrar:

It seems to me that the Republican National Committee does indeed exists solely to help GOP candidates win elections based on its party platform, which is the extent of its role in policy creation. Once those GOP candidates are elected, it is then their responsibility to create policy in league with other elected officials in their body politic.

Second, it also seems to me that the folks who created this site understand fully the power of the internet to influence conservative activism, otherwise they would not have created this site and would be content to write letters to NR and American Conservative.

Let's get our new efforts off the ground by battling over ideas of substance.

This is getting sillier and sillier

Let's get our new efforts off the ground by battling over ideas of substance.

How can we, "battle over ideas of substance" if we, as party members, can't set policy in order to determine which ideas have substance and which do not?

Why should we, "battle over ideas of substance" if we, as party members, can't demand our elected party members abide by them?

Mr. Sykes, don't listen to me if listening to one of the little people offends you. Use your own God-given intelligence to understand just what has happened before our very eyes.

Two observations:

Congress, with the aid and support of our Republican President, just passed legislation socializing the very foundation of our entire economy. Where is that in our Republican Party platform? Now you and Pat may be naive enough to believe Congress did so solely for the protection and benefit of the American people, but I think not. Republican Congress members acted to protect their own political exposure in this debacle primarily because they knew they could do so without facing strong political opposition from their own party, or its leadership, or from any of the present RNC Chair candidates.

Observation Number two:

As I have stated before, the Internet is a very, very powerful communicative tool, and just like any other powerful tool, it can either do a great deal of good or a great deal of harm, depending on how it is used.

In the political arena, the Internet can either be used to empower the voices of the many so that the wisdom of the crowd can be used to create unimaginable good, or it can be used to amplify the voices of a few by creating the Piped Piper effect, as we have all just seen in its use with the Obama campaign. I prefer the former to the latter. This is the political precipice upon which the Age of the Internet has brought us all. We ignore it at our own peril, Mr. Sykes, and that of our party's, and that of our blessed Republic, and that of our own cherished liberty.

Let me just leave you the same unanswered question I left Pat: Do you support the Resolution?

ex animo

davidfarrar

There are two sides to this story

Congress, with the aid and support of our Republican President, just passed legislation socializing the very foundation of our entire economy. Where is that in our Republican Party platform? Now you and Pat may be naive enough to believe Congress did so solely for the protection and benefit of the American people, but I think not. Republican Congress members acted to protect their own political exposure in this debacle primarily because they knew they could do so without facing strong political opposition from their own party, or its leadership, or from any of the present RNC Chair candidates.

 

The counter argument is they believed that any other vote would be political suicide and they knew their own party and its leadership did not have the financial, organazational or manpower resources to come to their aid if they voted against the deep pockets of the financial services industry.  As it turns out the votes did more harm than good for many members and led to more than one defeat; but there were also several who saved thier seats with their vote. 

If you want the party to be able to exert disipline, it must also be able to provide assistance.  We were outspent nearly 2-1 in Congressional races, 3-1 in some cases.

 

deep pockets...

...thats the problem, Woodrigdge. The GOP continues to cater, pander, grovel toward these "traditional" deep pockets because they feel they have no choice.  Look at illegal immigration problem.   Most of our elected reps know that the Base is opposed to amnesty and wants existing laws enforced, but they continue to go the opposite direction. Why?  Because they know that Tom Donohue and the US Chamber will cut them off.  So, once again, its a decision, "do we go broke or listen to the Base?"  A rock and a hard place. Or so they rationalize.  The GOP has trapped themselves in false dichotomy.  Instead of being imaginative and coming up w/other sources for their fundraising.   Shallow thinkers control the RNC/GOP.  That's why they, like a dog, return to their vomit.  Darvin Dowdy

Returning to substance ...

David: Thanks for the reply. I think we are talking about two separate issues, which is at the heart of the obfuscation that rules American political discourse today.

The RNC sets the platform for the party and is responsible for fundraising and promoting campaign activities. Elected representatives, independent of the RNC, set policy and craft legislation according to the dictates of the office or legislative body they are elected to.

That was my main point in posting a reply to your comment. The RNC does not create government policy or craft legislation, therefore, Patrick's original statement that the RNC's role is to win elections is accurate.

Second, I happen to be well versed in the use of the Internet for mass media, having been a journalist and run my own online news organization. As has been pointed out, conservative bloggers scored the first victory with online tools vis a vis Dan Rather, which was a game changer in 2004. The left took roots after that and has built a wave of momentum for 2006 and 2008, while we seemed to be content with punditry over activism. Now that we are in the minority, the onus is on us to respond. I don't think conservatives are asleep at the technological wheel. We are adjusting now to be the party not in power. Sites like this and the many others out there prove we are ahead of the curve with our response.

Finally, in GOP politics, I am a little person, being nothing more than a precinct captain in my small southern community.

Sincerely,

Jeff 

ps. What resolution are you referring to?

Are you sure about that?

The RNC sets the platform for the party and is responsible for fundraising and promoting campaign activities. Elected representatives, independent of the RNC, set policy and craft legislation according to the dictates of the office or legislative body they are elected to.

I always thought it was the delegates to the RNC Convention who adopted the party's political platform. Who knew?

And call me old fashion, but I always thought the Republican Party's political platform was a minimum set of political ideals political candidates would need to support in order to receive the party's endorsement. Again, who knew anything different?

Of course, the RNC does not create government policy or craft legislation, after all, we are governed by a constitutional republic, not mob rule. But creating political policy through a deliberative process which has to be supported by political candidates wishing to have the letter "R" placed in front of their name on the ballot is fundamental to a representative democracy. In this respect, creating and maintaining a set of political ideals to guide our elected leaders IS the primary role of the RNC, not simply winning elections.

Therefore, Patrick's original statement that the RNC's role is to win elections is not accurate.

Jon, if you don't understand how the Internet has changed the ground rules of our political system, even in the face of Obama's most recent demonstration, I am not sure you have the political experience to fully appreciate its impact. So let's have a look at your small southern community and your local party organization.

Within your small southern community precinct, how many registered Republicans are there who have really never actually participated in your local party organization?

Now, how many of those same registered Republicans would get involved in your local party organization if they could first get involved with the party online -- an online system that gave them a voice within their party, allowed them to speak and to be heard?

ex animo

davidfarrar

Did any of those "good"

Did any of those "good" Republicans support the bailouts? If they did, they're not "good" Republicans.

Note it is a rhetorical question - I already did my homework.

 

Why

1. Why aren't this site and friends lavishing such attention on asking BHO questions? Wouldn't that be thousands times more effective? See this post from a couple days ago.

2. In the past, Rufinni was the beneficiary of a similar flawed voting system to that used by the ATR site, and he was since involved in a similar effort using a similar system. Perhaps this incident will help him realize that popular voting systems don't work. The only way to select quality questions is described at the link. Note, however, that just using parts of that won't work.

No intent

It seems to me from your statement above "Good Questions to Vote for in the ATR Debate" of addressing the issues as a party platform that the republican voters want. YES it is the RNC's job to sit policy that the voters demand.

If a chairman is not in line with the demnds of the Republican voters then you truly do not represent the party. First and formost the party must adopt a platform then elect a chairman who is in line and suppors that platform.

What you said boils down to you and the RNC have no intention of addressing nor setting policy based on what the members want as per the vast amounts of posts already posted in the forum on the debate questions. SO why ask anyone just go about you normal elite self serving arrogance and just deside for everyone what they should want like the good socialist you are becomming.

And while your at it make sure you change from Republican to commiecrat instead of playing the deception game. 

NO set policy NO republican vote

opaww 

 

banned at RedState

I was just banned at the RedState page regarding this issue, for a comment that anyone else would never have been banned for.

 

And the only obvious reason is because I supported Ron Paul in this election, and not the Democrat John McCain.

 

"Moe Lane" shouldn't dare try to deny it. I made a simple comment about the repressive tactics of the RedHats and BlackHats at the RNC, which I experienced first-hand, and I was banned by someone who obviously refuses to ban people who use invectives there that are just as bad or worse.

 

I'm referring to all of the uses of well-recognized insults to people who are mentally handicapped - specifically, the use of the word "retard". So many posters there simply slap on Ron Paul's name, and Wheee, they get to insinuate that supporters of Ron Paul are mentally handicapped. You know - retards.

 

I have been a registered member of RedState since my friend Mike Krempasky first created the site. I have been an active and involved conservative Republican for over 20 years. My comment is even one of the ten that Erick and Patrick selected to encourage everyone to vote up. And because I supported Ron Paul in this election -- and NOT because I called the McCain camp on the carpet for their Gestapo-like "security" techniques, which I witnessed first-hand -- I was banned.

 

Shame. 

Consider sending a note to the admins

I think they are pretty reasonable if you explain the issue.

Good luck.

Without consideration of his fitness of a candidate...

... I would say that it is a disturbing trend that Republicans would consider supporting a third-party candidate.  That shows fairly well a widespread discontent.

As it stands, the neo-cons have fallen out of favor and are having a tantrum; the so-cons are on their heels; the libertarians have gained a bit of muscle; and the paleocons have an opportunity to once again become involved in policy.  Some frictions there as intraparty power changes hands.

Here's a great post about it

socons are in charge. the big business folk have been displaced

your party continues to go into the know nothing basket.