| About Us | Contact | Donate | User Blogs | Login |
Introducing Project Battleground
The right needs a few good bloggers.
Actually, more than a few. We need more good bloggers in every battleground state and in every competitive Congressional district in 2010.
As important as having activist blogs like The Next Right is at the national level, it's even more important at the state level. The states are where the mainstream media is breaking down big time, with multiple local and regional newspapers expected to stop publishing in 2009. Media coverage in these areas won't just go away; it will move to the Web and the blogosphere. Many of the reporters and journalistic resources at cash-strapped newspapers will likely land at left-wing "alternative" news websites affiliated with the likes of the Huffington Post, the Center for Independent Media, and ProPublica.
If the right doesn't act now, we could find ourselves outgunned in this next shift in media just as badly as we were outgunned on the Internet in 2008.
We need conservative websites and blogs in every state that are dedicated to winning those states. They should be run by sophisticated activists or consultants who know how politics works, who know where the bodies are buried in the statehouse, or young up-and-comers who are interested in working in the political arena and can use this as a venue to prove themselves. We need sites like the Flash Report in California, Minnesota Democrats Exposed, Red Mass Group, Sayfie Review, run by my friend Justin Sayfie in Florida, or the Politicker network.
Now is actually a very opportune time to what I'm calling Project Battleground. An unusually large number of Republican operatives now find themselves with decidedly fewer opportunities for career advancement as a result of the last election. To those operatives to whom that last sentence may apply: there is no better way to get your name out there than to become a public voice in the political debate in your state, and to do it using new media. Most of the good state political websites are run by people with real experience in politics, whether they're operatives, consultants, or people with significant experience volunteering. If you know what you're talking about, the chances of success are very, very good, and you'll be the key voice defining the public battle to take back a Senate or House seat. I view blogging as essential to what I do as a political consultant, not because I flog my clients or use it to get new ones, but because I can use public arguments to prepare the ground for the kinds of strategies that help get good candidates elected.
OK, I'm sold, so what do I next? Just click the Read More link below to fill out a form letting us know of your background and interests. You really don't need our permission to start a new site, and you can use the form to make us aware of an effort you're already running or one that's planned. I may use the names to put together a Google Group for leaders in state political blogging -- and if it makes sense, I'm happy to piggyback on similar efforts that may already exist -- with the caveat that Project Battleground will focus more on electoral than policy battles.


Comments
Just what we need
Great idea! This is just what the right needs as we move toward 2010.
Duplication?
I've seen something like this already created. News Platoon is already out there and producing content. I understand that we on the right want the best product available, but you also don't want to get dilluted to the point you become ineffective.
What does Project Battleground offer that News Platoon doesn't and visa versa?
Bill Kristol is looking for a new gig.
And he lives in a Blue State. He wrote his last column for the Old Gray Lady this morning.
Conservative America
Great idea. I submitted the online movement I launched called Conservative America
http://americaconservative.ning.com
And so, what are you going to
And so, what are you going to sell, when you have nothing to sell. It is the republicans that failed the middle class. Now what do you do?
Duplication of Effort
We really need to have those people working on major projects with a number of followers sit down and talk to one another.
I know of at least 4 efforts to do just what Patrick is proposing here, and all we are doing is retreading over the same ground over and over again. Like pointed out, News Platoon is already out there with state-specific sites. We have at least 7 social networking groups, all of which tread the same ground...and even with the same people!
I understand a bit about wanting to be seen as the leader, but to defeat the Obamacons, we need to act with unity and not fall all over one another putting out the same projects.
Obama didn't have 6 versions of my.barackobama.com. He had 1. He didn't have 6 social networks competing and doing the same things, his networks were focused on certain areas and aspects.
We've got to stop this balkanization before it gets further out of hand.
News Platoon
As I mentioned in my post, I recognize that others may be addressing this problem from different angles. News Platoon seems to be building a blogging platform a la Soapblox using Wordpress MU that will allow anyone to blog. I leave the question of which platform to use open -- and in fact, don't advocate centralizing this under The Next Right, as I well could. I just want to identify personnel, and they can use whatever platform they want including News Platoon.
I also think the perspective is slightly different as News Platoon seems very plugged in to state free market think tanks and legislative activity. I am more focused on elections.
I think there's room for multiple approaches. As Kristol said, let 1,000 flowers bloom. The market will decide who is good at doing what.
Do you see what you are
Do you see what you are saying? The Left does not have to beg for people to "blog." Is there something about conservatism that prevents people from becoming popular bloggers?
I appreciate your concern, but just asking the question says that there is no "there" in conservatism.
Do you really want to say that?
The internet is the friend of pragmatism
An interesting question - and I think the answer is "yes". The problem is, the Internet makes fact checking extremely easy. Think about Rush, Hanity, O'Reilly. On their programs they have the key advantages of pre-screening their guests/callers, and then controlling the conversation by being able to cut the other person. Then they wrap the person in a cloud of often-poorly-substantiated assertions.
That doesn't work on the web, where the other participants can check your facts in a flash. Here is an example of David Farrar trying to do it to me on this very site.
There is a reason why Daily Kos is open to everyone and why RedState bans anyone who Moe Lane thinks is a bit suspicious.
The internet is the friend of pragmatism and the enemy of poorly-sourced unsubstantiated ideology.
Stephen Colbert said it best.
"Reality has a well known liberal bias."
Wow, my whole post condensed to 7 words.
Thanks!!
you've got some nerve
Oh this is complete bullcrap. Redstate has a restrictive posting policy just as Democratic Underground does. You, a Daily Kos trusted user, have got a lot of nerve coming here to a conservative website and telling us that we don't value open discussion.
boo on DU. boo on redstate.
I won't abide censorship.
Why the militarism?
Project Battleground joins News Platoon and the RedState Strike Force with its silly badge. Why all the faux military trappings? American's who voted for Democrats this last time around are not an enemy to be countered by force of arms. You have to persuade them, not shoot at them - no elections will be won via the base alone.
two points
First, to Ruffini's actual post, I still find it mind-boggling that the GOP does not have a better handle on this already. We have been aware of the Left's lead on this issue for years, and this last campaign cycle sure looked like there was a lot of foot-dragging and resistance to that newfangled interwebs by the established conservative activist networks. Maybe it looks different from the inside, but I'll bet not. There have been bright spots, but they are defined by the large darkness.
Second, Repack Rider noted "The Left does not have to beg for people to 'blog.' Is there something about conservatism that prevents people from becoming popular bloggers?"
I think there are several things that give the Left an inherent advantage. The list would include the Bush presidency, which really gave the Left a target to rail about as new media first came on line. It would also include the fact that conservatives have traditionally succeeded in other arenas (talk radio, faith-based groups, etc) and haven't felt the same level of necessity to use new media. And hand in hand with that is the general tendency of early adopters to be young people, who also have a general tendecy to be more liberal in their views.
The issue isn't that there are no conservatives with ideas and a desire to act on them. The issue is that they are less aware and adept overall with new media, and they will probably demand a structure more than the Left has. But new media is becoming mainstream, and it will more and more reflect the actual political landscape instead of just the fringes.
Conservatives are not naturally activists
Another big problem that conservatives will have with new media is the same root problem we have had with the old media: we simply are not as "political" as the left and therefore are not drawn to devout our lives to political activism. We devout ourselves to our families, our churches, and other private endeavors. We generally think of politics as messy and dirty, and try to avoid injecting it into places where it doesn't belong. Conservatives who want to devote their lives to helping others do so by becoming pastors, or stay-at-home moms, or entrepreneurs. Only a small minority of conservatives are drawn to devouting their careers or large blocks of time to politics. That is why the left was able to grab control over most universities, newspapers, non-profits, etc. Probably also explains why they have more success in recruiting strong candidates and in getting their incumbents to stick around longer. We should likewise expect conservatives to be outnumbered by liberals in the ranks of bloggers, on-line activists, etc.
The left's numerical advantage should be partially neutralized in the new media because it is much easier to start a new blog and establish its reputation than to start a newspaper or TV network. The reach of conservatives in the new media will be driven as much by demand for news from a conservative perspective as by the supply of conservative activists. But we shouldn't expect conservatives to be able to do everything that liberals do with new media. We'll have to be more careful picking our targets.
historically, the unis have been run by liberals
simply because the conservatives who were there did not like politics. it's constitutional.
Sadly, now all those conservatives vote Democratic.
Engineers, scientists, economists... all democratic. no wonder why the republicans deride "the elites" so much...
It doesn't make much
It doesn't make much difference in how much media you have. If your policies have failed the middle class, then you lose. Look at the electoral college. Look at the states you lost. Ask yourself why.