| About Us | Contact | Donate | User Blogs | Login |
MA-SEN: Ogo Off the Ballot?
UPDATE: EaBo Clipper from Red Mass Group responds saying Ogonowski should be fine.
Not good, if it pans out:
When the deadline for certification passed yesterday, Jim Ogonowski, the Republican leadership's choice to challenge US Senator John F. Kerry, was 82 signatures short of qualifying for the GOP primary ballot, according to the state's central voter registry.
But Ogonowski's campaign aides contend there are enough certified signatures at various town offices around the state not filed yet on the computerized registry to put him across the 10,000 threshold. ...
Even if Ogonowski does get the 82 signatures he needs, his fight probably is not over.
Election specialists say he will not have the needed cushion of extra signatures to insulate himself from legal challenges.
Ogonowski's only primary opponent, Jeff Beatty, is expected to challenge the validity of his signatures before the ballot law commission.
I like Ogonowski. I worked with a coalition of bloggers to raise $20,000 for his MA-5 special campaign last fall. Back then, he had a kick-butt volunteer operation and a ton of grassroots energy. It's at least a little mystifying that this is such a close call. Stuff like ballot access should not be a close call, not for a guy who's already on the air.
Read on.
And sorry, but Jeff Beatty isn't really an option for me. I met him at CPAC. I'm sure he's a serviceable candidate who can get 42-45% of the vote against John Kerry (who is more of a laughingstock back home than people realize). But he wouldn't make the statement Ogonowski would in the context of a McCain-Obama general.
Consider the optics.
Massachusetts, as we all know, is one of the most Democratic states in the union, but the backbone of the Democratic coalition is the white working class vote in places like South Boston, Worchester, and Lowell. The face of Massachusetts liberalism is Beacon Hill and Cambridge, but the one-party nature of local politics mean that elite Democrats are badly underrepresented compared to their brethren in other states. This leads to some unexpected tensions.
Most people assumed that Barack Obama would win here handily with the support of Governor Patrick and Senators Kerry and Kennedy, not to mention significant portions of the Kennedy clan and the state's liberal base.
So it was one of the big surprises of Super Tuesday that Hillary Clinton won MA by double digits.
Between February and mid-April, five polls in a row pegged the McCain-Obama race even to within 7 points (a more recent poll has Obama up 12). (This in a state which has been 20-30 points more Democratic than Republican at the Presidential level.) All polls show Obama significantly underperforming vis a vis Clinton.
It doesn't help Obama that his rhetorical muse, "Coupe Deval" Patrick, has been arrogant and ineffective as governor. In 2006, "Yes, we can" festooned Patrick's website.
Ogonowski vs. Kerry would be a working class Republican vs. an out-of-touch Boston Brahmin Democrat. Ogo's ads have hit on just this point.
eBurke's post earlier today showed how this works: in the October special, Ogonowski ran ahead of Republican numbers in working class towns, while Niki Tsongas handily carried the towns like Concord in the Brahmin Belt.
Even if this were a single digit race, Ogonowski could point the way for a Republican revival as an anti-elitist, working class, un-PC movement in the Northeast. With Obama at the top of the ticket, it could be a low ebb for MA Democrats at the federal level.
But a good message doesn't count for much without a good volunteer organization, particularly in machine states with onerous ballot access requirements.
(Via Red Mass Group.)


Comments
Uh, Patrick, this is Basic Stuff.....
Ogonowski may be the best thing to happen to politics since Oliver Cromwell dismissed the Long Parliament. However, doesn't it raise a few red flags that a guy who has been preparing for this Senate run ever since he lost in that close shave election to Tsongas can't even get a First Down?
He understood the rules going in. Why was his team not ready for the ball game? The fact remains, he lost his race to Nikki Tsongas. This is what I usually say to my friends who want to place the superb Mike Steele with John McCain.
It helps to know how to win first.
Agreed...
The fundamentals still matter. We can talk all day about the miracle of post-heirarchical, Web-driven smart-mob campaigns with empowered user-driven content (or pick your own random set of Web 2.x buzzwords), being able to read the calendar and the election laws of the state...and knowing how to work the system to ensure you don't have ooopsie moments like this...is the most basic of political requirements.
A Bad day in MA
This is horrible. If he doesnt make the ballot it is a bad day in MA. Kerry is known in that state as someone who never leaves Boston. He is no Ted Kennedy who is known across the state as someone who actually travels outside of Boston. Ogo could have given Kerry a real run for his money.
The problem is obvious here
"the Republican leadership's choice"
If you wait for Republican "leadership" in most states, you''ll be waitin quite awhile
Assumption
A good campaign doesn't assume that. Like I should talk. I spent a whole Saturday in Delaware last fall getting signatures for Fred Thompson only to find out only to find out the consultant the campaign hired lied about how many signatures he had.
Jim should get on the ballot, right?
While the fact that he missed the deadline doesn't exactly inspire confidence in his organizational skills, it seems to me that his appeal is credible, and that he should easily make up the 82 signature difference with the sigs from the other offices.
Has Jim recruited anyone from the Romney presidential team? Romney wasn't the right candidate, but they sure knew how to run a tight organization.
Over before it started
Great post! This was setting up to be a really interesting race -- I've been covering this on my blog for a few weeks. Not sure what Ogonowski's been playing at either - on his campaign blog, one of the two posts is about him collecting 20,000 signatures (not really sure what happened). Either way, it's pretty embarrassing for guys like Romney who endorsed Ogonowski and threw a few fundraisers for him. For the record, I love the Ogonowski ads, they're great, i love the message...but the general consensus of the pundits seems to defy the actual situation. Ogonowski is touted as Mr Grassroots, yet Beatty is the stronger candidate amongst the rank and file. Like you said, a good message doesn't count for much without a good volunteer organization.
I suppose the most disappointing thing about all of this is that it makes the Mass. GOP look like a bit of a joke...the best guy to challenge Kerry can't even get his name on the ballot! Ouch!
Are there enough motivated GOP activists in Mass....
....to run a competent campaign?
Why on earth did he come up short? I thought this guy had grassroots support out there?
MA demographic picture a bit more complicated
Hillary's base here wasn't just working class white people, but working class and low-information Democratic voters in general.
There are huge pockets of immigrant communities in areas like Lowell, Worcester, and South Boston, and Clinton drew much of their support here in the primaries. Obama's base in Massachusetts was more upscale whites (your typical Northeast liberal elites) but their is a significant segment of the working class in this state that is not likely to vote for McCain, despite his stance on immigration, and even less for Ogonowski.
Seems Strange
Something like this makes me wonder if there is something (besides signatures) missing from the equation? Not meaning to cast aspersions on the other Republican candidate at all; with the Democrat lock on Mass one would look there for "weird happenings." In any case, this is not a good thing.
How the process works in MA
There is a lot of misinformation out on the internets about this story. Some even lists Jim as an airline pilot which he never was. So here's how the signature process works in Massachusetts and why I feel confident that Jim will have over 10,000 signatures at the end of the day.
Campaigns have about 2 months to gather the raw signatures necessary for ballot access. It is adviseable to garner twice as many signatures as necessary to withstand the inevitable non-certifiable signatures.
Signatures for a candidate are only certifiable if they come from voters enrolled in the candidates party or unenrolled voters what we here in Massachusetts call independents.
The signatures are turned in to town and city halls for verification of the signatures. During that process names that are either illegible, not of the requisite party registration, or are note enrolled as a voter at all are disqualified. The town clerks are supposed to use an on-line system from the Secretary of the Commonwealth's office to register the signatures in a central location. This is the system that shows 9918 signatures.
The town clerks have until a specified date, in this case May 27, 2008 at 5pm to certify the signatures. The law states they must certify it does not state they must enter the signatures into the electronic system to my knowledge. Routinely the signature count in the system is lower than the actual number of signatures verified. It was so in 2002 on a congressional campaign I worked on.
Then one week after the town clerks are supposed to finish signature certification the nomination papers are due at the Secretary of the Commonwealth's office. During that time a candidate or his team may contest that uncertified signatures are valid, and often will win the challenges upon second looks.
For two reasons I am confident that Jim Ogonowski will gain over the 10,000 signatures required for ballot access.
1) the fact that there are signatures from towns that did not use the Secretary of the Commonwealth's system for certification. I have been assured by the campaign as was the Boston Globe that the number will bring them over the threshold.
2) the campaign has been challenging uncounted signatures at town and city halls statewide and have been adding to their count. A count that is not being updated in the electronic system.
For those reasons I am confident that Jim Ogonowski will have ballot access. Do I wish the process would have been easier, yes. But he'll be on the ballot in short order and this will be behind him.
Pardon the constant snickering
From any partisan Libertarian in earshot when a Republican says "stuff like ballot access should not be a close call." Just pretend I'm not giggling like mad & thinking of VERY sarcastic remarks, and it'll be ok. And when it comes to ballot access please remember, as ye sowed, so are ye reaping. Right f---ing now. :) Don't like it? You know what to do in the future...
JMR
MA Senate Race
Full Disclosure: I work for the Jeff Beatty campaign.
The most troublesome theme through this thread is fact that Jim Ogonowski may not get on the ballot. Perhaps -- we'll let the Secretary of State's office figure that out. Yesterday, Jeff Beatty's campaign submitted 11,782 certified signatures. (And there is more from where that came from.) The theme should be that Jeff Beatty is on the ballot and will be a credible challenge to John Kerry.
Why was it easy for Jeff to turn in that many signatures? Those who know Jeff are inspired by his personal biography, his vision for Massachusetts, and his can-do attitude. He has the relevant experience in both fighting terrorism and in running a small business -- attributtes that are criticial in this day and age. When you inspire folks -- you can easily get the required number of signatures.
His biggest drawback simply is the fact that people don't know who is and where he stands on the issues. The most recent Rasmussen poll taken in April noted that 42% of the respondents weren't sure about Jeff largely due to the fact that they don't know who he is. In other words, when people get to know Jeff -- we will have a fight on our hands in the Commonwealth come November. Those who know him were out there getting signatures in March and April. When more know about him they will be voting for him in November. This is a race that Jeff can win.
Drug Rehab
Drug rehabilitation (often drug rehab or just rehab) is an umbrella term for the processes of medical and/or psychotherapeutic treatment, for dependency on psychoactive substances such as alcohol, prescription drugs, and so-called street drugs such as cocaine, heroin or amphetamines.
====================================
Sandy
massachusetts drug rehab