| About Us | Contact | Donate | User Blogs | Login |
What Can Republicans Do? Win.
I have to disagree with the tenor of Jon's latest post. As Republicans, we are not doomed to losing every policy battle these next four years. Who could have imagined, for instance, that we'd come so far on the stimulus? The stimulus is now officially unpopular, with 37% supporting passage in its current form, reminiscent of the plummeting support Clinton's early economic initiatives. In two weeks the GOP has been transformed from the party of Bush to the party of sensible, bipartisan opposition to fiscal insanity. It's amazing what a change in the underlying political dynamic in the form of a new President will do in so short a time.
And it's not just the stimulus. We won the first procedural battle against universal health care this week by successfully ousting Tom Daschle from HHS and more crucially, from the position of health czar. Daschle was a skilled legislative operator who could stymie Republicans as well as anyone. Though the dream Jon and I share of Howard Dean at HHS probably won't come to be, the Obama Administration will not have as skilled an advocate on health care as Daschle.
On another policy front, the new Administration is not exactly banging fanning the flames on card check, though I suspect this is a red herring for something really bad to come out of Congress. Notice how Obama initially wanted a $775 billion stimulus, Congressional Dems larded it up to over $900 billion, and the compromise position is now $700 billion -- very close to Obama's original number? I suspect that's probably the point, and something we'll see more of in the months to come.
Where we don't have a chance to win the policy battles, we must seize the chance to win electoral battles. Nothing will do more to build passion and confidence and activism at the grassroots level than winning elections again. Steele at the RNC was a big step in regaining that lost confidence. And now we have a chance to prove we can win again by taking back NY-20, and the statehouses in Virginia and New Jersey. Our 1993 wins were a precursor to our 1994 success, not just in these two Governors' races, but in obscure municipal races in places like Jersey City, New Jersey that hadn't elected a Republican in decades.
In a thumbnail way, things have already started to move in our direction. The Fairfax County, Virginia supervisor election Soren and I have written about ended in a 1-point victory for the Democrat in a county Obama won by 21 points and Mark Warner won by 37 points. There was no particular reason for it to be so close -- Gerry Connolly was just elected to Congress after all. I think mostly this is a sign that Republicans are becoming fired up about voting again, and along with GA-SEN Obama's coalition is not recreatable downticket, a problem for any Democrat on the ballot in 2010.
Not to mention the fact that we currently lead in New Jersey (!) and the Democrats will probably nominate crazy Jim Moran's brother for VA-GOV (more on that later).
Jon is right that the deck is stacked heavily against us in D.C. right now -- which is all the more reason to focus on elections and on battles in the states. But this need not mean our atttiude should be glum or defeatist. There are plenty of opportunities for morale-boosting wins if we know where to look.


Comments
We need to break down the Fairfax special
I have some thoughts based on turnout dynamics, but it really needs to be done by a local who has a "feel" for the place.
Moral victories aren;t enough. We need real victories. Where were the last 1.5% of the vote to be had there and how do we get it in the next race
Fairfax County Race
Patrick,
Minor correction: you wrote that Tuesday's special election in Fairfax County was a "supervisor election." While the winner, Sharon Bulova, will preside over the Board of Supervisors, the race was actually for County Chairman.
The Hatred is On for Mike Steele
Already he is being tarred, feathered, and ridden out of town on a rail among the black commentariat. He's being given the Clarence Thomas/Condi Rice "race treason" treatment.
That means that in the back of their minds, they find him a threat.
I suspect that this guy could become another Ray Bliss, but the elections will tell the tale. Let's see how good a field mechanic he becomes.
Race Treason?
Field Negro sayin' that Rice ought to go get laid is now somehow RACE TREASON? Who the fuck you bein readin, fool?
I think Field has Steele's number, front and center.
To quote FN:
Next time cite some dang sources,fool.
Dear God you're a despicable
Dear God you're a despicable bigot.
what about me quoting a respectable columnist
(blogger in this case) makes me a bigot?
I can wait.
Or, wait, were you trying to say GOD was a bigot? because, well, Shem and Ham might have something to say to you.
Field Negro is a "respectable
Field Negro is a "respectable blogger"? According to who? Other bigots?
Quoting a respectable blogger doesn't make you a bigot. Approvingly quoting a bigot makes you a bigot.
well, I count respectability differently than you might.
but I'd say that scoring some interviews with local and national press counts as gaining some shred of respectability.
David Duke scored interviews
David Duke scored interviews with local and national press. That didn't make him any less of a contemptible bigot.
while that's true, my original question was
about why you consider myself and Field Negro to be bigots. Are we bigoted against southerners? White folks? Black Republicans? You REALLY haven't been clear.
To clarify...
I don't think Republicans will lose every policy fight. I just think the political reality is that Republicans are going to lose a lot, and there's relatively little they can do to change that fact in the very near future. The hope is that Republicans will realize (a) they can still improve some of these things on the margins, and (b) they should focus on the margins that have positive feedback effects on changing the structural problems.
Virginia Election and GOP Policy Issues
The closeness of last Tuesday's special election in Fairfax County suggests that if the GOP in Virginia had an effective organization we would have won. As you pointed out in a posting last week, Patrick, we have little identifiable likely-GOP voter lists in part because those in control of the state party insist on using an arcane convention system to nominate state and district candidates. Since, we do not register by party in VA, it is exceedingly difficult to identify and turn- out prospective GOP voters in an election such as this one. Virginia Republicans ought to be raising questions as to WHY the state central committee continues to insist upon this modus operandi as opposed to primaries for the nomination of candidates. A change is long overdue.
Regarding Jon's posting of yesterday and his above clarification, I agree with him. Our intellectual capital base is very weak and this handicaps our efforts to compete effectively on substantive policy issues until we can generate some fresh brainpower.
Opposition can be good for enacting major policies
It should be very possible to get more than moral victories during the age of Obama. Look at the history of big-ticket domestic initiatives over the past few decades and you'll notice that most of them were enacted by a President of the political party that typically opposes the policy. W pushed through Medicaire coverage of prescription drugs and the big increase in education funding with "No Child Left Behind." Clinton reformed welfare, cut capital gains taxes, and established the child tax credit. Bush the Elder signed a sizable tax increase, the Americans with Disabilities Act, and other major civil rights and environmental legislation. Reagan expanded immigration. Both Bushes raised the minimum wage. Presidents have been far less successful in passing major initiatives that were rooted in their party's core principles: W and Reagan cut taxes, Clinton raised them. That's about it. Maybe Obama's stimulus will soon join them, but that looks far less certain than it did a week or two ago.
The reason is that a coalition of a President and the opposing party is nearly unstoppable. With support from the opposing party, a President can almost always bring along enough of his fellow partisans to pass Congress. And it is much tougher to oppose a bill when your party's President crosses the aisle. The only major legislation I can recall being blocked despite support from a President and most of the opposing party is Bush's immigration proposal.
Obama is first and foremost a politician. He certainly has his own ideas, but he wants desperately to be re-elected and to be popular. If conservatives can build popular support for their proposals, they'll be able to bring Obama along on at least some of them. And once Obama says he supports something, it'll be tough for Pelosi and Reid to stop it.
Mindshare is First Priority
The first year of the Obama Administration is the time to focus on showing the superiority of the Republican ideas and the shortcomings of the Democrat/Liberal ideas. They are certainly giving us ammunition!
The process of a Republican Restoration begins with the voters deciding that what Democrats do in power is nuts for the country and for themselves. Republicans then have the opportunity to offer more sensible alternatives. Once Republicans establish themselves as more realistic, THEN and only THEN can the electorial contests swing in our favor.
Of course, we have to field attractive candidates, ones that the voters can trust to reliably implement the Republican plans, then we can win back power and implement better governance.
the republicans need to make
the republicans need to make sure that the have a good insurance forum to be able to discuss all the issues. it is also very important that the republicans do not have out bursts in congress against the democrats.