Are Rahm Emanuel and Tim Mahoney covering up a bribe?

Promoted - an insider speculates about today's news that Tim Mahoney paid off his mistress.

Today’s breaking news about Florida Congressman Tim Mahoney paying off his mistress for $121,000 begs a very important question: What did Rahm Emanuel know and when did he know it?

According to ABC News, which broke the story online earlier today, Congressman Rahm Emanuel knew (or had heard) about Mahoney’s affair last year and confronted Mahoney about it.

Senior Democratic leaders in the House of Representatives, including Rep. Rahm Emanuel (D-IL), the chair of the Democratic Caucus, have been working with Mahoney to keep the matter from hurting his re-election campaign, the Mahoney staffers said.

A spokesperson for Emanuel, said he confronted Mahoney "upon hearing a rumor" about an affair in 2007 and "told him he was in public life and had a responsibility to act accordingly." Emanuel's spokesperson said he had not had any further contacts with Mahoney on the subject and did not know the woman involved worked on Mahoney's Congressional staff until informed by ABC News.

So what…so Rahm had a conversation more than a year ago.  Big deal.

Ya, except that we know one thing about Rahm from his vociferous denials two years ago about his involvement in leaking the Mark Foley emails: Rahm is a habitual liar.

RealClearPolitics.com flashback:

For those keeping score, Emanuel denied knowledge of the [Foley] e-mails six times, and twice declared the source of the leaks was a Republican. As it turned out, the answer to Stephanopoulos’ first question concerning whether this was a Democrat dirty trick should actually have been ‘Yes.’

It stands to reason that Rahm Emanuel wanted to protect his investment in Florida’s 16th Congressional District and wasn’t about to let Mahoney’s tryst undo all the damage Emanuel was able to do to Republicans in 2006. 

The question to Rahm is “What did you know and when did you know it?”  Only this time, tell the truth. 

The theory is that Mahoney could have laundered the $121,000 payoff through his media vendor back in March. (For those still keeping score, that’s a major violation of the law.)  Mahoney made a $150,000 campaign expenditure to his media consultant back in March.  According to the FEC, the money was reported for a “Media Time Buy.”  Except, no media time was ever purchased.  That’s a whole lotta money for nothing in return.  (Other than the silence of a woman scorned.)

UPDATE

Mahoney's media vendor has put out a press release.  You need to read this.  Below the fold.

 

For Immediate Release
October 13, 2008
Contact: [SNIPPED]

 Fletcher Rowley Chao Riddle Inc. Resigns from Campaign of Congressman Tim Mahoney (FL 16)

Statement of Fletcher Rowley Chao (FRCR, Inc.) CEO Bill Fletcher:

"As of today, FRCR, Inc. has resigned from Tim Mahoney's campaign and permanently ended our relationship with him.

"According to ABC News, Tim Mahoney apparently included our company in a
secret legal settlement without the knowledge of our firm.   Our firm did not agree to any legal settlement.

"If these allegations are true Tim Mahoney's actions are unacceptable and not in line with FRCR's business ethics."

BACKGROUND: It has been reported in news stories today that Florida Congressman Tim Mahoney has paid off a woman with whom he allegedly had an affair.  Without the knowledge of Bill Fletcher, John Rowley, Ben Chao or Mark Riddle, Tim Mahoney promised Ms. Allen a job with our company as part of a legal settlement.

 

3
Your rating: None Average: 3 (2 votes)

Comments

Let's get Florida AG Bill McCollum on the case

Let's demand a full investigation by Florida authorities, not a politically correct DC whitewash

ag.mccollum@myfloridalegal.com

 

Investigate ASAP...

Ironman,

I'm in total agreement with you on this one. Corruption has no place in our government...

I hope they get Mahoney good; however,

You simply have absolutely nothing to back up your inflammatory title about Emanuel - just throwing the mud up to see what sticks, eh?

What is the State Crime?

The Florida attorney general can investigate only state crimes.  This would seem to be a possible federal violation of campaign finance laws and possibly income tax violations. 

This is embarrassing for The Next Right...

There's no story here involving Rahm Emanuel.  The connection is less than tenuous, and the implied conclusions are a stretch. I'll be disappointed if this story and its headline stay here without being modified in some way to reflect that you have some measure of standards.

Otherwise, you're just another hysterical blog, and we certainly don't need another one of those.

What's tenuous about Emanuel's knowing about the affair

a year ago, and then continuing to fund Mahoney's campaign?

We are to presume he took no interest into whether his scarce campaign dollars were being used to pay for former Mahoney flames?

Ah, my good friend once again you forget that rules are

different for Democrats than they are with Republicans.  When Mark Foley got caught sending e-mails, IMs and text messages to underage male congressional pages that was sufficient to launch a full investigation into Congress, including the then Republican leadership, since after all they were reponsible for the "Republican culture of corruption" in this case howerer it is simply to be considered no big deal and unworthy of media attention.  Besides what Mahoney, did is typically a resume enhancer with Democrats anyways.

RAHM’S ‘RENT’ IS JUST THE TIP OF ETHICS ICEBERG

Date: February 18, 2009  Change that we can all believe in?

RAHM’S ‘RENT’ IS JUST THE TIP OF ETHICS ICEBERGBy Dick Morris And Eileen McGann02.17.2009 

Published in the New York Post February 17, 2009

News broke last week that Rahm Emanuel, now White House chief of staff, lived rent- free for years in the home of Rep. Rosa De Lauro (D-Conn.) - and failed to disclose the gift, as congressional ethics rules mandate. But this is only the tip of Emanuel’s previously undislosed ethics problems.

One issue is the work Emanuel tossed the way of De Lauro’s husband. But the bigger one goes back to Emanuel’s days on the board of now-bankrupt mortgage giant Freddie Mac.

Emanuel is a multimillionaire, but lived for the last five years for free in the tony Capitol Hill townhouse owned by De Lauro and her husband, Democratic pollster Stan Greenberg.

 

During that time, he also served as chairman of the Democratic Congressional Campaign Committee - which gave Greenberg huge polling contracts. It paid Greenberg’s firm $239,996 in 2006 and $317,775 in 2008. (Emanuel’s own campaign committee has also paid Greenberg more than $50,000 since 2004.)

To be fair, Greenberg had polling contracts with the DCCC before - but each new election cycle brings its own set of consultants. And Emanuel was certainly generous with his roommate.

Emanuel never declared the substantial gift of free rent on any of his financial-disclosure forms. He and De Lauro claim that it was just allowable “hospitality” between colleagues. Hospitality - for five years?

Some experts suggest that it was also taxable income: Over five years, the free rent could easily add up to more than $100,000.

Nor is this all that seems to have been missed in the Obama team’s vetting process. Consider: Emanuel served on the Freddie Mac board of directors during the time that the government-backed lender lied about its earnings, a leading contributor to the current economic meltdown.

The Federal Housing Enterprise Oversight Agency later singled out the Freddie Mac board as contributing to the fraud in 2000 and 2001 for “failing in its duty to follow up on matters brought to its attention.” In other words, board members ignored the red flags waving in their faces.

The SEC later fined Freddie $50 million for its deliberate fraud in 2000, 2001 and 2002.

Meanwhile, Emanuel was paid more than $260,000 for his Freddie “service.” Plus, after he resigned from the board to run for Congress in 2002, the troubled agency’s PAC gave his campaign $25,000 - its largest single gift to a House candidate.

That’s what friends are for, isn’t it?

Now Rahm Emanuel is in the White House helping President Obama dig out of the mess that Freddie Mac helped start.

The president’s chief of staff isn’t subject to Senate confirmation, but his ethics still matter. Is this the change that we can depend on?

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

 

reply

Emanuel’s tactic is to criminalize, which is why he makes such a great bipartisan pick, save for the fact that he operated under the assumption that the opposition party is a criminal organization. marire penis