| About Us | Contact | Donate | User Blogs | Login |
Obama's Priorities: A Lesson in Narcissism.
Today marks the 20th Anniversary of the Fall of the Berlin Wall. World leaders are gathering in Germany to celebrate the day when Communism was defeated.
The current President of the United States won't be there. He's too busy.
He wasn't too busy to fly to Copenhagen to make a self-centered appeal to the International Olympic Committee to bring the Games to Obama's hometown, Chicago, though. That little jaunt was easily squeezed in between all the "hard work" Obama was doing ignoring the urgent requests for troops to execute the strategy his hand-picked General had requested back in the summer. His supporters claimed that he could work during the flight and he wasn't really taking any time off. This is true. So why is he suddenly too busy to go and mark a very important date in world history?
The answer is simple: Copenhagen and the Olympics would have been a PERSONAL victory for Obama if he were able to secure the games. There is nothing more important than building our Narcissist in Chief's legacy. Going to Berlin would do nothing for him on that level. In fact, he would be celebrating the fall of an ideology that he was raised admiring (see Frank Marshall Davis). It may very well be that Obama wouldn't be able to hide his grief over the day Communism failed and Freedom won yet another war.
If the event isn't about him, Obama has no time for it. And I haven't even mentioned how the fall of the Berlin Wall is a triumph of American Foreign Policy and why that factors into Obama's decision not to attend, too.


Comments
What a load of nonsense (Obaba's priorities)
The Berlin Wall is about the PAST (Hillary Clinton and Steny Hoyer will be in Berlin anyway, BTW). I would rather see Obama devote his time and energy to efforts ensuring a better FUTURE.
MARCU$
He isn't ensuring a better future...
So why not go to Berlin?
Wait... You think implementing two of the biggest Statist programs in US history ensures a better future?
This HC monstrosity and Cap and Trade are deficit ballooning, job killing programs that the Federal Government has no business being involved in.
That's right, health care in this country is just fine
Never mind that health care insurance premiums are growing five times faster than inflation and wages.
In case you didn't notice...
The Pelosi Bill increases premiums, and taxes, and mandates, and barriers to entry to ensure a government monopoly.
Maybe you don't know what the hell you're talking about or supporting?
And in case you didn't notice
There is widespread agreement that this bill REDUCES the deficit by $100 billion in the first 10 years and much more importantly begins to "bend the cost curve" and so will produce even greater benefits to the national economy.
You're full of crap.
... The only "widespread agreement" is among the people who want single payer. In other words, people who will say whatever they can to get support for any bill that leads in that direction.
The CBO isn't even able to agree on it.
http://www.politico.com/livepulse/1009/CBO_Bend_the_cost_curve_what_does...
Basic reading comprehension
Elementary facts: the CBO scores the imapct on the budget, and that is all - they are the Budget office, not the Macroeconomic office.
Impact on budget, impact on national economy = two different things, as was made clear in my comment.
Eleven top experts in health care economics said this:
Note, these are people who study the subject - not folks who just read the insurance industry talking points, like, say, Greta VS.
Note: Those are people...
... who are progresssives and want single payer.
You do know that back when Social Security was passed, there were "experts" who said it would be fully self-funded, right?
It's not. Neither is Medicare / Medicaid. Neither are the GSEs who ruined the mortgage market and are STILL, even after billions in bailouts, operating at a loss and backing bad paper.
Progressives have this vision of the world that doesn't exist. Unlimited government IS the problem, not the solution regardless of what the Keynesian "experts" say.
You simply assume
You don't know a thing about the people on that list - you just assume that if someone says Program X will work, they do so because of political ideology. Because your political ideology says government programs can't work, never work. And that is why HCR reform has you so frightened. As Bill Kristol wrote in an internal GOP memo in 1992, HCR had to be killed because there was a serious danger it would work and would be popular.
My ideology says...
...limited government can work. HCR is an example of unlimited government and history tells us it doesn't work.
And the line between "limited" and "unlimited"
is where ever you say it is?
Nope. The line is clearly drawn...
...In the Constitution.
Article 1 Section 8 to be exact.
What you mean to say is
the line is drawn via YOUR INTERPRETATION of Article 1 Section 8 - as this thread clearly demonstrates, your interpretation is at odds with that of pretty much everyone who isn't holed up in a bunker some where.
My interpretation is the same as Madison's...
... you know, the guy who wrote it.
And no, the fact that he's dead doesn't suddenly change what he originally meant when he wrote the Constitution.
It's also the same interpretation as Thomas Jefferson's. The guy who Democrats claim to follow.
The expanded interpretation of Article 1 Section 8 didn't happen until FDR needed to be able to justify his New Deal programs and couldn't wait for the amendment process.
Now you go ahead and get the last word, because I know you can't help yourself.
Let's let George Will have the last word
from "One Man's America":
Really?
Meanwhile, in the real world, it not only is fully self-funded, it runs a massive surplus every year. In 2008, that surplus was $186 billion.
Accounting tricks...
... don't work on me. Maybe they do for you, but that's your problem.
At some point in the not too distant future, we're going to have to raise taxes significantly to keep Social Security solvent. And that's without any of these new entitlement programs factored into the mix.
Who needs facts and figures and expert opinion
when FOX News is available 24/7.
Its always fun to see what the latest obsessive personal attack,
the winguts have come up against the Pres.
If he had gone to Berlin your kind will spout similar nonsense against the President: What is he doing in Berlin celebrating American triumph when he is ensuing the destruction of American greatness with his socialist policies back home? Hypocrite and demagogue.
You said it, not me.
Freudian slip? A passing moment of lucidity?
You're right. Obama is ensuring the destruction of American greatness with his socialist policies here at home. But I would have given him credit for being there.
No worries, though. He bailed.
Re: "But I would have given him credit for being there[Berlin]."
Now don't be dishonest/rather fool yourself. You will give him credit (even if you didn't want to, as your first reaction) when the right wing echo chamber gives it to him. And they never do. Even if they do for some reason(to give the benefit of doubt over Berlin), they will come up with equally insane ways to attack the character of the Pres. For taking all the limelight at Berlin, for saying/not saying something in a speech not vetted by National Review, etc.
Btw
Why would you personally give credit to the Pres. if he goes to Berlin? Isn't that the 'minmum' you expect of an American President? Do you mean to say that even though Pres. Obama is a socialist/communist-sympathizer and a narcissist hell bent on destryong the legacy of American exceptionalism, he went o Berlin and did his bare minmum duty as a Pres., so I give him credit! What utter nonsense.
what was that condition called?
Obama Derangement Syndrom?