For Republicans Who Don't Care if Obama Wins

Are you out of your fucking mind?!  Oh I get it.  This will be like 1992-1994 when the bungling Clinton and the congressional Democrats led to the Republican Revolution.   Because it's that easy right?  History repeats itself just like that.   There are multiple problems with this rosy scenario, problems that if some of the lily-livered liberal-enabler conservatives have their way, would decimate two-party rule in the country.

There are no more Southern Democrats to moderate the left-wing Democrat leadership of Pelosi (D-Hell).  When Clinton won in 1992, the Republicans gained 9 seats in the House proving that the Reagan Revolution is still working its way in the South.  Now there is no more room to grow in the South.  Today, Dems already captured two Southern seats even before November.  No one is predicting that the GOP will gain seats in Congress and in fact, 2008 has the making of 2006 - the sequel.  THERE WILL BE NO FACTION IN GOVERNMENT TO STOP OBAMA WHEN HE GETS ELECTED.  NONE!!!

Mark my words, if Obama wins, conservatism is dead.  Not dead because its principles are not popular, dead because its primary vehicle to move its policy, i.e., the REPUBLICAN PARTY, will not be able to overcome the vast insitutional advantage that Left-wing Democrats would setup under Obama.  It took 40 fucking years for the Republicans to claim the House, 50 YEARS TO CONTROL CONGRESS AND THE WHITE HOUSE.  And some of you conservatives think it's as easy as one election cycle to undo the damage. 

Letting the most liberal senator to win the presidency and the most left-wing Congress to ever convene is poison for the country.  This country doesn't need one day of Left-wing rule, much less two years.

That's why I say, you're out of your fucking mind. 

3.166665
Your rating: None Average: 3.2 (6 votes)

Comments

I disagree

I disagree with you on this.  If Obama is elected, there won't be anything to stop him for 2 years.  He'll be such a terrible leader that we'll be able to win a majority in one of the houses of Congress if not both.

The question I ask myself is, "If McCain is elected, who is going to keep HIM in check?"

Seriously, John McCain has made a career out of squashing conservatives at every turn.  What's worse is that when he screws up, it's going to further alienate the rest of the population from the GOP.  It's a lose-lose with McCain as President.  At least with Obama we'll have a talking point to use against Democrats and their inability to accomplish anything.

Besides, it's unrealistic to believe we're going to win every single presidential election from here on out.  If we're going to lose one, McCain is the right guy to lose it.  He's old, he's  a RINO, and he's done things to the conservative movement that are only done in German porn films.

I'll be happier with McCain OUT of the White House.

www.ktracy.com

McCain is unfit to be President.

Then the alternate question is what should conservative voters do who believe that Senator McCain is totally unfit to be presdeint.  Senator McCain is incompetent, lazy, has no leaderhsip ability, and has demonstrated to ability to manage.

What the repubicans should do is treat the Repubican convention as a working meeting where they work at fixing the problems instead of treating it a drunken party.  Until the Republicans admit that McCain is a terrible mistake, the rebuilding of any conservative movement cannot begin.

well, you were a little more blunt than I was

but I agree.

Superdestroyer occasionally  says something productive in the midst of his rants. Yep, we have much bigger problems than John McCain. I don't think McCain is good for more than one term anyway, so we ought to be restructuring the party in a generic sense. His winning just buys some credibility and breathing room. 

See my previous post about "It's the fight in the dog" for a template of how a minority Republican legislative caucus can be effective when a Republican executive tries too hard to make nice with the Democrats

We can't restructure the party...

...while it is winning. If McCain wins, his victory will serve to vindicate his own brand of liberalism within the Republican Party. The result of which is the left will villanize McCain simply because he stole the election from them and the right will fight against his agenda where it is in conflict with their own values. The Republican Party will support McCain and fight any effort for change. Their reasoning will be simple: "Why change when we are winning? All we have to do to win elections is to bear left."

"Now, about that cap and trade legislation"...

Whereas if Obama wins, we can start to rebuild the Party from the ground up,  using the Internet as our tool.

ex animo

davidfarrar

This my friend is sad but true

Problem is.... at this moment in history a 20 year hiatus will completely destroy the party.

Not that conservatism would die but it would be so far from regaining a foothold that Marx would be smiling :).................... That’s what’s at stake, this go round!!!

 

Don't get me wrong I'm all for a good cleansing -- but sign-o-the-times and all...............

 

The 20-year hiatus? Hardly...

A 20-year hiatus will only occur if McCain wins this election and forestalls a party shakeup. If Obama wins, his victory will shake the very foundation of the Republican Party, galvonizing the right to action. And motivated "action", my dear friend, is precisely what the Internet needs to be successful. Again, I cite  the Ron Paul web effort.

With a successful web-offensive underway, we can win back Congress by 2010 and a veto-proof Congress, plus the presidency by 2012. By political standards, it would be the fastest comeback in history.

ex animo

davidfarrar

While I see much merit in this...

..as does Rush -- what most are forgetting is that fact that along with internet sites -- talk radio and FOXNews will have been thoroughly dismantled in the interim with a liberal CIC and Congress

 Sorry to say -- mark my words!

No consevative party will be around in 20 years.

Consdiering that less than 50% of the children in kindergarten are white.  In 20 years, they will be voters and most of them will be automatic voters for the Democratic Party.  What is why McCain has no business being presdient.  He is too stupid to understand the long term consequences of policy decisions.  Open borders and unlimited immigration will continue to make large portions of the U.S. unlivalbe for middle class Americans.  Yet, McCain keeps pushing for it.

 

 

This is astonishing. GOP is not equal to White

You argue that there will be no conservative party because:

Consdiering that less than 50% of the children in kindergarten are white.

There is plenty of good evidence that 2nd generation and farther Hispanics are at least as conservative as whites. The problem is the borderline racist tone that sometimes comes out of the GOP that so few Hispanics feel comfortable in the GOP. That's what Bush, Rove, and McCain understood. We can win them. They agree with us on more issues than the Democrats.

I have to see this.

There is plenty of good evidence that 2nd generation and farther Hispanics are at least as conservative as whites.

 

Then I'm sure you will have no  problem linking to it. How are you defining "conservative"?

 

The problem is the borderline racist tone that sometimes comes out of the GOP that so few Hispanics feel comfortable in the GOP. That's what Bush, Rove, and McCain understood. We can win them. They agree with us on more issues than the Democrats.

Again, I'll have to see you back that up. The fact is that Hispanics have never voted Republican. Reagan lost badly among Hispanics. Bush lost badly among Hispanics. McCain is losing badly among Hispanics. What makes you think that "we can win them"? What issues do they agree with us on more than the Democrats?

 

I've seen polls indicating that Hispanic Republicans are more in favor of bigger government than are white Democrats. Hispanic Republicans, not even Hispanics in general.

 

And "Hispanic" is not a race.

Republicans and minorities

There is not one single minority group that does not support bigger government, less freedom, and more pork.  As long as the Democrats can pander to minorites by promising more set aside with the rich (read white) paying for the programs, those groups will always be solid Democratic Party voters.

To use Rove and Bush to support your argument demonstrates how empty it is.  They have not been right on anything. What makes you think they will be right now.  The only way to appeal to Hispanics is to be just as liberal as the Democratic Party.  Bush tried that and now the Republican Party is in a death spiral.

 

We're mind readers now?

Excuse me..

I'm black, and I don't support any of the policies mentioned above. I'm sick and tired of the bigotry coming out of you people. This is why the GOP and conservatism is dying..

When you're not bashing 'preachers' you're dissing minorities.

I hope McCain wins and blasts your twisted version of 'Conservatism' straight to hell.,

 

mind readers

He did not say that you personally have these views. He said that minority groups, including blacks, have these views. I don't see how you can disagree with that.

 

The preacher bashing bit, I agree with you on.

 

 

Re: We're mind readers now?

Excuse me..

I'm black, and I don't support any of the policies mentioned above. I'm sick and tired of the bigotry coming out of you people. This is why the GOP and conservatism is dying..

You are right, Rensen. It's definitely one of the reasons we're having so much trouble now. Just don't think that all conservatives are the same. We're not.

See my post below.

"Six in ten (61%) registered whites and over half (52%) of registered African Americans prefer paying lower taxes and having a smaller government. "

 

 

Some data

Pew Hispanic Cener/National Survey of Latinos

 

http://pewhispanic.org/files/reports/12.pdf

 

 

Some highlights, quoted from the document;

 

 

  • Immigration is transforming the Hispanic electorate. Among Latinos who are U.S. citizens and registered to vote, a considerable majority (72%) were either born outside of the United States (41%) or have parents who were born outside of the United States (31%). Moreover, many of the foreign-born only recently became citizens, with about one in eight (13%) registered Latinos reporting that they took the naturalization oath after 1995.
     
  • The number of Latino voters has the potential to double in size if all adult Latinos currently in the United States gain legal immigration status, become citizens and register to vote.

 

  • Registered Latinos tend to have faith in government and favor a larger government, even though they have somewhat more conservative views on certain social issues such as abortion. In addition, Registered Latino voters are far more concerned with education as a political issue than any other segment of the electorate. Like other registered voters, they are also focused on the economy, health care and Social Security. Registered Latinos who identify themselves as Democrats or Republicans take different views on key issues than white registered voters with the same party affiliation.

 

  • Registered Latinos are somewhat more socially conservative than registered whites, having particularly different views on the issue of abortion. On the other hand, Latinos seem to share social views with those of registered African Americans. Registered Latinos who were born outside of the United States tend to be more socially conservative than Latinos who are native-born.

 

  • More than half (55%) of registered Latinos believe that abortion should be illegal in most (31%) or all (24%) cases, while 42% disagree, believing that abortion should be legal in most (30%) or all (12%) cases. Registered African Americans tend to agree, with 55% saying abortion should be illegal in most (24%) or all (30%) cases and 45% saying legal in most (33%) or all (12%) cases. In contrast, a majority of registered whites (53%) say that abortion should be legal in most (34%) or all (19%) cases, with 45% saying the opposite, that abortion should be illegal in most (31%) or all (14%) cases.

 

  • Almost half (48%) of registered Latinos feel there are too many immigrants in the United States today, while 7% think there are too few and 40% think there are the right number. However, about three-fourths (76%) of registered Latinos feel the United States should allow more Latin Americans to come and work in this country legally (36%) or that the United States should allow the same number it does now (40%). One in five (21%) believes the United States should reduce legal immigration from Latin America.

 

  • Like white registered voters, registered Latinos are evenly divided in their trust of the federal government to do the right thing. However, Latinos differ from other voters in favoring a larger government even if it means paying higher taxes.

 

  • Over half (55%) of the Latino electorate would prefer to pay higher taxes to support a larger government. However, almost four in ten (38%) disagree and would prefer paying lower taxes and having a smaller government. Foreign-born and nativeborn registered Latinos tend to agree on this. Latinos differ from registered whites and African Americans on their preferred size of government and willingness to pay taxes. Six in ten (61%) registered whites and over half (52%) of registered African Americans prefer paying lower taxes and having a smaller government.

 

 

The upshot  - Hispanics are social conservatives, as African Americans are. Whether that will translate into Republican votes is an open question. The social conservatism of African Americans does not get us their votes. Meanwhile, Hispanics are fiscal liberals. In fact, they are more fiscally liberal than any other ethnic group, including blacks.

The best case scenario for an increased Hispanic voting presence in America is that it will result in a country which is more socially conservative and more fiscally liberal. More likely they will contine to vote as they are doing at present - both for social liberalsim and for fiscal liberalism. If the  Republican party wants to compete for their votes it will have to totally abandon it's libertarian/small government wings.

 

see my previous comments about IBM

Successful businesses restructure while they are still making money. Businesses that rest on established products and practices fail when the tide turns agin 'em.

Site clean up.

WIll the people who own this site ever do anything about people like this "fucking" person? Or will this site just be a variation on DU?

 

I was kind of wondering the

I was kind of wondering the same "fucking" thing.

blacks and Hispanics are not social conservatives

Both demographic groups have out of wedlock birthrates above 50%.  They commit crimes at a much higher rate than whites.  They also believe that the government should backstop every bad personal decision that people have made.  Just because blacks and Hispanics go to church more than whites does not mean that they are conservative.  The churches they go to support massive social welfare spending and more invasive government. 

The best way to describe the politics of blacks and Hispanics is that the government needs to be touch on whites so that there is more government goodies for them.  Senator Obama is promising more government goodies paid for by rich whites. 

Unless the Republicans Party can find a way to give more government goodies while keepingn the votes fo white fiscal conservatives, the idea that the Republicans will ever get the votes of minorities is laughable.

 

 

OMG

Wow...

Way to reach out to those communities...

My people are SUCH a burden on white society.

This is really sad.

You dick

Thanks to you my taxes are going to go up because of that alienating FULL-OF-SHIT rhetoric.  White people gave us the Kennedys, the Clintons, Carter, abortion-on-demand, divorce-on-demand, gay-marriages, Berkeley, hippies, Obama's mother, etc.  But yet you don't seem to be blaming white people for that.  That's how I can tell a racist from a human being. 

Seriously, boys, are there no

Seriously, boys, are there no content guidelines for this forum?

Surely you have more respect for your own site than to allow this kind of stuff to stay on the board.

I agree! Clean up the "potty mouths"

The language on this site is filthy.  Is there no one in charge of editting?

Ironic that there's a blog

Ironic that there's a blog post up stating that "If someone posts something defamatory or racist or antisemitic, you can be sure we'll do exactly what the Obama campaign did: take it down."

Apparently profanity, vulgarity, and misogyny are acceptable, though. I'd like to repeat my earlier suggestion that the forum needs a dedicated moderator and established content guidelines before the membership gets any larger.

Bigotry will "superdestroy" the GOP and America

Superdestroyer's comment is so bigoted it makes me  sick. Not all blacks go to churches like the ones the Obamas chose.   Many conservative pastors preach personal responsiblity.  Originally, most blacks didn't want to accept charity anymore than whites.  I know plenty of white people that have been milking the system because they are too lazy to go to work.  It is white people that enslaved the poor with entitlement programs.  Some still think they are "helping" the poor,  We need to help them ween off entitlements by giving them a helping hand rather than handouts.  That goes for people of all races; not just minorities.  People that are educated and trained are able to find employment so they may no longer need governmental assistance. It's like the saying, "Give a man a fish and he'll eat for a day. Teach a man to fish and he'll eat for a lifetime." "Wisconsin Works" was started by Gov. Tommy Thompson. It worked so well for WI that President Clinton wanted it promoted nationally. That program has helped many get off total public assistance to supplemental assistance. Many are now totally self supporting.  It woudl be even better if productivity was no longer penalized with the Fair Tax; because more jobs would become available.

People will jobs are less likely to commit crimes. (the idle mind is the devil's playground) So, teaching and training also helps reduce spending for incarcerations. Huckabee fought for fairness in the courts. It is not fair that one person gets a slap on the hand or no punishment at all for the same crime another gets incarcerated just because of a difference in skin color or financial status. Huckabee received 48% of the black vote because he treated them equally, expected others to do the same, and went to where they were to ask for their votes.  Huckabee was endorsed by many conservative black preachers.  It's a shame more of the white ones didn't have the backbone to support him.

 

Ok, how do the Republicans appeal to minorities.

Rensen,

Considering that Hilary Clinton could not get any blacks to vote for her, do you really think there is anything that Republicans can do to appeal to blacks  And please, do not give the moveon.org pat answer of stop being racist.  Conservatives should be against quotas, racial set asides, and affirmative action. Yet, most blacks believe that even the opposition to AA is racist.

Have you actually listened to what Senator Obama has said.  Free healthcare, free college, more government jobs, etc all paid for by taxes on the rich.  It is clear that to the Democrats, rich is a code word for "whites." 

There is no way that a conservative party can oppose the racial spoils systems and hope to appeal to minorities. And since the birthrate of the minorities is much higher than the birthrate of whites, there is little possibility that the Republicans can survive as a relative party.

Reach out to minorities

One of the most significant problems that the GOP has is the presupposition that the minority vote is locked up for the dems to begin with. They are not thinking of proactive ways to get into these communities and target the young people, who are not yet tainted, with the 'can do' message of conservatism.

Most of us, even those born in dysfunctional family situations, still have mothers that say "go to school, work hard, be somebody".. that is a conservative message. This is the same in most families regardless of racial background. (Similarly, if your mom is a crackhead, it doesn't much matter what color you are, you're screwed without external intervention)

But along comes an 'enabler,' usual a democrat, most of the time of your own race, (think Al Sharpton) to say, you poor victim, you don't need to work to be somebody. Sit at home and we'll give you a handout, you're entitled.

It's like the drug dealer who will give you 100 dollars to stand guard, vs the minimum wage janitor job and the corner store. Human nature takes the easy way out.

The democrats are winning because they are getting there first with the message. We need a farm team of young ethnic conservatives who are willing to go into the haunts of the Shaptons and Jacksons, and counter their message. For now, that will be more effective than preaching at those communities from a distance.

And we're out there. I'm a teacher, not one student leaves my room without having learned to start thinking like a conservative. I'm not political, but the world view and attiudes I foster in my students are conservative ones.

Another significant door to three legged conservatism for these communities is social conservatism. You get them in church, they are a captive audience. Many of our curches are multiracial and multi ethnic. We should be volunteering with the youth there and instilling conservative values.

The key is getting to them before the hardwiring kicks in. We can't convert the adults, they're addicts already..we have to target the kids. Where is the conservative alternative to BET? Conservatism needs to be mainstreamed into the popular culture. People have to be willing to invest to see a long term return.

And politically, in that most visible of ways, we need to stop being chicken shits and go to the debates sponsored by black universities..visit and speak in those black churches. White conservatives are battling a guilt that they shouldn't be taking on themselves. If you know you're not in the wrong, you have courage to tell the hard truths, and are not shamed into hiding.

This is how it appears.. Either you are racist and don't want our votes (which I doubt) or you are scared, feeling guilty, and as a result keeping from us the very message that could save us.

The democrats aren't scared, they don't feel guilt.. they saw an opening, took it, and now black people are paying the price. Conservatives should have a crusading mentality. If they could realize that by going to battle against that culture of entitlement, they are in effect saving a generation, it would make a world of difference.

The upshot..stop ceding the territory to the dems. reach out..you may be surprised at how many reach back.

My local GOP candidates had nothing but contempt for anyone

in the Black and Hispanic communities, which is the biggest reason I've become so disgusted with them.  They are courting the Asian communities instead, probably because they're less entrenched as traditional Democrats. 

When I asked what they were planning on doing for our local communities, I got absolutely  no response.  This is what prompted me to come out here in the first place and try to find out what others are experiencing locally.  I'd love to help raise the educational (and English speaking) standards, bring investors into poor communities, offer micro loans to craftspeople and street vendors, reduce gang violence, bring more volunteer assistance to elderly people, foster faith-based and private sector community work for teens, pregnant single mothers, homeless people, mentally ill and drug/alcohol dependent people, just to name a few things on the list.  There are just unlimited opportunities to help our local communities and engage minorities, but it takes a new and different kind of Republican mindset that goes beyond cocktail parties and big business alliances.  So we can talk and talk about it, but unless you and I are going to run for office (and even then we can only hold one office out of x number that need new blood), I don't know what the solution is.  But I'm definitely open to your thoughts.

Good on ya

I'd love to help raise the educational (and English speaking) standards, bring investors into poor communities, offer micro loans to craftspeople and street vendors, reduce gang violence, bring more volunteer assistance to elderly people, foster faith-based and private sector community work for teens, pregnant single mothers, homeless people, mentally ill and drug/alcohol dependent people, just to name a few things on the list. 

You sound like you are representing the conservative values that made this country strong better than some of the racist faux-conservatives commenters on this site.  These fakers of the party have no interest in pursuing Ronald Reagan's optimism and inclusiveness and just want to keep conservatism some kind of an 'in-joke' amongst themselves.  

Still no answer for how to appeal to blacks

Resen,

Your post reads like the typical Democratic operative response.  The Republicans offer    outreach while the Democrats have quotas, set asides, 8A contracts, affirmative action, government jobs, and non-prosecution of criminals.  That is a losing proposition for Republicans.  When Republicans pander to minorities, all it does is lose white voters.  See immigration amnesty as a great example of this.

It today's world, there is no way that a Republican can attend a "black" debate withouth either being called a racist or blatant pandering so much that they alienate whites.  The best outcome that a Republicans politician can hope for at a black church or black sponsored debate is to not commit a major gaffe.

Why would an young black want to become a Republicans operative. They will never win an election, they will be alienated rom the black community, and in the end, they will embarass themselves.  See Michael Steele in Maryland as a good exmaple of what happens to quota blacks in the Republican Party: failure.

The black community is now so far away culturually from middle class whites that there is no appeal that can work for Republicans.  EVen the idea of education and work is so far from what most white believe, that there is not way that Republicans can use those issues to appeal to whites.  See John McWhosrters "Losing the Race" to see good examples.

It is much more likely that the Repubicans could get back the suburban whites in the northeast that have been lost due to the incompence of the Bush Adminsitraiton and the Republicans in Congress instead of believing that Republicans can ever outpander Democrats for black votes.

Please list some issue and policy positions that Republicans could take to appeal to blacks withouth alienating whites.

 

 

 

 

Minorities don't need 'special' policies from GOP

Super,

This is the fundamental problem. You are buying into the propaganda that we can only be reached with handouts... This is NOT true. You don't need to have a 'special policy' for blacks that is different from whites. We are all Americans who will benifit equally from the conservative paradigm.

Mike Huckabee is the classic example of a politician who approached the black community with the message of conservatism and no caveats. He approached them as equals with intellect and political savvy of their own. He acknowleged the GOP's failure to campaign for their votes, and then shared his vision for what conservatism could do for them...and they loved him for it. (This at the Tavis Smiley hosted debate)

He has made such an impact in that community, that were BO not running, there is a strong chance that they along with 'evangelicals' may have been a part of his base. This is not an exaggeration. Tavis Smiley said on air during a broadcast that Mike was the best republican candidates for African Americans in a generation, and was heckled a bit by co-hosts who thought he was threatening to vote GOP. With the right candidates we can easily siphon the conservative black vote from the dems.

He didn't pander.. but he didn't hide from the truth of past GOP failure to engage their community either. He was actually personally invited to sit with the King family on MLK day at their memorial service. That's not pandering, that is acceptance, based on an established trust.

There are far more minority conservatives out there than you give credit for, and many are beginning to get engaged in the political process... many of us currently work with Huckabee's PAC and are working to get him on the ticket. Huckabee himself has influenced McCain's own efforts to reach out into those places normally ceded to the dems, and it is a step in the right direction.

To answer your question directly, the GOP does not need a 'minority package' policy. There are enough closet conservatives in both the hispanic and black communities, that we could make inroads with undiluted conservatism, if we actually just asked for their votes.

Why would they want to be republicans, if we have sent the message that we don't think we need to have them to have a winning coalition? Republicans have to have a real 'heart' conversion about their attitudes to minorities. If we reach out with sincerity, we'll make contact. If we try to 'play' them as a sppecial interest group we'll get shown the door.

PS

Middle class blacks have much more in common with middle class whtes, that they do with poor of working class blacks. the divide is not as huge as you seem to think.

The 52% is suspect for blacks and Huckabee.

Resen,

The 52% for Huckabee was based upon a sample size of nine people.  A change of one person would have given Huckabee only 33% of the black vote.  Also given that Huckabee got 60% of the white vote versus 44% of the black vote, it is not that impressive. http://www.cnn.com/ELECTION/1998/states/AR/G/exit.poll.html

95% of blacks have voted for Senator Obama.  Even after being the most avid supporters of Clinton in the 1990's, they threw them overboard and voted for Senator Obama.  100% of the Black Congressional Caucus are liberal Democrats.  If a black person wants to go into politics, they become Democrats.  Huckabee could do nothing about that.

Even money on Huck for the black vote

I'm telling you..many African Americans are dems from habit, not values. If it had been Huck v Hillary as the last two standing..we could have split the black vote almost 50/50 at least in the general.

Nobody will get a significant portion of the black vote with the first ever black nom in history in the race... too much 'significance' to the event.

Once this threshold is past, and its no longer significant that a minority advances that far in the game, a republican with the right demeanor and message wil be able to significantly poach the black conservative vote.

At the very least, Obama's success takes some of the right to play 'victim' eternally from those who may be inclined to do so. (Sharpton)

Wow, this is heated.

As an black man myself. I gotta say, Huckabee did appeal to me. Largely based on the tax issue, but he appealed to me none the less. Rensen has made some good points.

The GOP HAS to stop thinking minorites are lost and start actually focusing on them. They don't need to give out handouts, they need to just acknowledge them and tell them their message. That is the key. Those on the democrat side may not listen now, but you have to keep trying, because not acknowledging them and considering the group lost to the democrats will only handicap the republicans in the long run.

You don't need a message either, you just need to showcase the conservative side. Some may ask, "What would you do for us blacks?", and thats a valid question. What would you do for them? The answer though, doesn't have to be 'handouts'. The answer, would instead be, smaller gov't, have you, along with everyone else, keep more of their paycheck, increased growth. Job creation(allowing private businesses to do such instead of jobs from the gov't), and so forth. The conservative message doesn't need to be changed for minorities, it just needs to be preached toward them. Being a former liberal I would know. 4 years ago, I would have voted Kerry to knock Bush out, During that time, I heard the conservative message and now, I'm here.

Please provide an example of a successful appeal to minorities

If you look at current U.S. House races and most state house races, if a district is more than 40% black or 50% minority, the Republican has virtually no chance of winning.  For all of those who claim that a Republican candidate can make a successful appeal to blacks or minorities, please provide examples of where Republicans have won in districts that are heavily minority.

I doubt if people can find a single one.

Won, none

because republicans tend not to live in those places. Because they tend to chase out people who are successful and keep in people who are victims

Were you born yesterday?

There are three Republican Cuban-Americans in Congress representing, you guessed it, majority-minority districts.  Until last year, a Latino Republican represented a majority-minority district in Texas.  In the state level, Republican success in representing majority-minority districts are even more pronounced.  In California alone, an Vietnamese-American represents a majority-minority Orange County assembly district and so does a Latina Republican in Indio.  It's possible, it's doable, and it's where the party is heading. 

well here's one