A Raw Deal- A Case for a No Nonsense Canidate in 2012

Personal opinion aside, one comment on this site has me irked about the chances that Barak Obama has in the 2012 elections. Why? Glenn Beck had a demonstration Tuesday on his TV program using a pair of caskets. The demonstration was that two men wearing a red shirt(Republicans) and a blue shirt(Democrats) were shutting the lid on the casket(the US). The Republican was using hammer and nails while the other had a power drill to screw the casket shut. The point of the demonstration is that the government programs that both the republicans and democrats have created are spending us out of house and shirt.

If you TiVo the show, you will see that the democrats have won the race.

Why did I bring up Glenn Beck when this column is supposed to be about Sarah Palin and her chances in 2012?

The conservative/moderate divide that runs through the Republican party has been a great one. Compare it to the policies of Ronald Regan and Arnold Schwarzenegger. Both are Republicans, and both are governors of California. However, one difference runs rampant between them. While both have tax and spent during their tenure as governor, Regan realized that a balanced budget and conservative principles is what led this country to greatness and he used the lessons that he learned as governor of California and lead this country as President to its most prosperous years. He also ended the cold war by threatening to use force and tore down the Berlin Wall. Arnold, on the other hand, has tax and spent his way into issuing I. O. U.s to state employees and cut funding to critical state projects and programs.

Where was I, oh yes, Sarah Palin. Sarah Palin's decision or indecision to run in 2012 is giving the liberal media fits because they are salivating at the throat for another bite at the apple to destroy her. They don't understand her popularity among Americans. Is it the fact that Sarah Palin says what she means and means what she says, or is it the fact that she knows the sentament of the American people and talk to them about it unlike Nancy Pelosi and “Dingy” Harry Reid(in the immortal words of Rush Limbagh) and talk down to them like they are nannies. It doesn't matter to liberals at the New York Times, Washington Post, MSNBC or CNN to name a few, they see someone who stands out in American pop culture and seeks to destroy them by hook or crook.

The point of this column isn't to encourage Sarah Palin to run in 2012, but if she does, then great. The point of this column is to show that, thankfully, if you hold to your principles you can withstand the liberal attacks and come out stronger than you come in.

The mystery of Sarah Palin can be explained through her political career. She doesn't speak nonsense, and has led by example. Her poll numbers have supported the fact that she knew what Alaskans and, by extension, Americans wanted like drilling for our own oil, having a strong national defense, and actually supporting capitalism. And Obama? He has the lowest approval rating in his presidency, the stimulus failed, “Cash for Clunkers” failed, and his “Universal” healthcare is in congressional hell and will not pass as quickly as he would like. He wonders why he is being compared to Jimmy Carter instead of Abraham Lincoln.

Let's chase a rabbit here and actually compare the two. Abraham Lincoln, when he spoke the emancipation proclamation during the Civil War, meant what he said and said what he meant. He fired his commanders on the ground just because they wouldn't fight to win the war. Abraham Lincoln treated all Americans as Americans and was willing to fight a war to keep it that way.

Obama? He drags his feet while men and women fight and die for our country while General McCrystal, a man that he appointed to be the man in Afganistan, is begging for 40,000 more troops by the end of the year or our efforts have failed. While Obama has indicated that he will have a troop increase, but only 35,000 according to one source. He also rammed through the stimulus package to reward his SCIU friends saying that we have to get it passed now or the economy will crash like the stock market did in 1929, much like he is trying to do with healthcare. Our reward for passing the stimulus? The highest unemployment in nearly 8 years at over 10%. That is one in ten working class Americans that do not have a job today, and that number is expected to climb.

In closing, America needs to return to our principles of limited government and stop the brand of socialism that Obama is trying to ram down our throats. America's debt doesn't need to grow nine to eleven times over the next ten years just to “fundamentally transform America” in Obama's image.

1
Your rating: None Average: 1 (3 votes)

Comments

Wonderful

Beck pours cold water over a Palin-Beck ticket but seems open to a Khmer Beck-Rouge Palin 2012 ticket to disaster:

 

Glenn Beck: ‘Yapping’ Palin belongs in the kitchen

http://rawstory.com/2009/11/beck-yapping-palin-kitchen/

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pn9MbQscz1w

 

 

Balanced budgets? Reagan??? Huh!

While both have tax and spent during their tenure as governor, Regan realized that a balanced budget and conservative principles is what led this country to greatness

What a weird statement! Of course, while Reagan cut taxes he most certainly did not curb government spending and consequently his years in office where characterized by record budget deficits.

The mystery of Sarah Palin can be explained through her political career. She doesn't speak nonsense

Please have a look at Andrew Sullivan's fact-checking...while Sully does have an obsession with her, the fact checked material on his website proves she spouts lots of incorrect nonsense. MARCU$

Please have a look at Andrew

Please have a look at Andrew Sullivan's fact-checking...while Sully does have an obsession with her, the fact checked material on his website proves she spouts lots of incorrect nonsense.

And that's not some opinion someone asserted--it can be documented, and has been. Spouting nonsense has, in fact, been her primary preoccupation since the day she was first thrust on to the national stage. It's precisely why she developed the cult following she has--she spouts the nonsense that cult wants to hear.

They don't understand her

They don't understand her popularity among Americans.

Sarah Palin doesn't have any "popularity among Americans." She's at 52% disapproval in the ABC News poll this month--she's sustained majority disapproval ratings since Oct. 2008 in that same poll. 34% now give her a "strongly unfavorable" rating, compared to only 20% "strongly favorable."

Where is her existing popularity centered? Not "among Americans" in general. In ABC's extensive demographic breakdowns, her base of support is made up of the dying remnants of the past: elderly white "evangelical" Protestant male Republicans.

Another place where NextRight needs to see SA's analysis

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5RgW5tgDIxY

Folks, Sarah's not going to be your way out of Obama in 2012, and you should already suspect that by the way the biased news media is trying to push her right now, but instead many of you are falling for the hype. Don't.

What the GOP needs to win over Obama in 2012 is a REAL candidate of change. My ideal slate, with either man as President and either as VP, is as follows:

Professor Walter Williams and fmr. Governor Gary Johnson. (Disclaimer: I've been trying to get the professor to run for over a decade, with 0 success, but he's very nice when he tells me "no." The man is just too damn smart to want the job, IMO, but saying that just makes me want him more!) Think "we" got excited about Ron Paul?? You anti-libertarian whiners haven't seen how excited I'd be if Walter Williams ran...

Johnson, especially now that Sanford tripped over his own schlong in Argentina, is one of the few credible fiscal conservatives you people have left, plus he's sane on the tax & spend drugwar. I know that's as emotional an issue for neocons as healthcare is for Democrats, but in both cases it's big-government statist FAILure. When you fail, the proper posture isn't throwing more tax money at the problem, it's tail between the legs RETREAT.

The Democrats made retreat a policy when their gun control idiocy failed expensively, and Republican drugwar control-freakery should be no different. You failed, so now retreat. That's the policy I expect, and I'll be mocking any others. I've been right about the tax and spend drugwar for a LONG time at this point, and I'm not going away anytime soon. We need to quit wasting money on failure.

a quibble, in a bubble

Regan (sic) realized that a balanced budget and conservative principles is what led this country to greatness and he used the lessons that he learned as governor of California and lead this country as President to its most prosperous years.

According to the data, the Clinton years were better than the Reagan years.  Moreover, the Clinton prosperity happened despite (or because of?) sound economic policy.

I'm saying something about perceptions, not trying to start a flame war.  It's easy to live in a conservative/Republican echo chamber where "everybody" "knows" Reagan was a great President and Palin is a brilliant politician.  But the country doesn't think that.  If Republicans want a majority of voters to pick them, they will have to understand a majority of voters.  Reagan gets mixed reviews and Palin, puhleeeze!

And you have to think about what would happen to Palin during the general campaign.  All that Alaska sleeze would come back, and all the lies in her book, and the fact that she can't articulate a coherent sentence about policy.  It would be Tina Fey all over again.  Remember that the most devistating lines from SNL were verbatim.

Bottom line for Republicans: look for a candidate who can win an election, not just your heart.

 

According to the data, the

According to the data, the Clinton years were better than the Reagan years.

And the '50s and '60s--the height of government intervention--blew away both of those. The claim that America's "most prosperous years" were under Reagan is ludicrous (growth in the '80s was barely above what it had been in the '70s, and both were pale shadows of what it had been pre-1973).