| About Us | Contact | Donate | User Blogs | Login |
A Few Random Thoughts On The Polls
I've kept a pretty low profile the last couple of weeks, because the state polls have been pretty scarce, and it is hard to say anything about polling during the convention season. But we can deduce a couple of interesting things:
(1) Based on the tracking polls, both McCain and Obama got negative bounces from their veep picks. This is interesting, but perhaps not surprising. Both Obama and McCain have strong personal brands. It is hard for two relatively obscure politicians (at the time of their selections) to add much immediately to the ticket. This is unlike someone like Kerry who got a large Veep bounce, by adding someone who arguably had a stronger brand at the time he was picked.
(2) Obama's convention bounce was significant, but not overwhelming. Doing an apples-to-apples comparison of polls (eg pre-convention vs. post-convention) we get the following:
CNN: +1
Hotline/FD +6
USAT/Gallup +4
CBS News +2
Gallup +9
Rasmussen +3
Which works out to about a 4 point bounce or so. This is roughly the bounce the RCP average shows.
(3) We won't know the full size of McCain's bounce until tomorrow, which will be the first day of polling which is completely post-RNC. Even with just partial results, his bounce looks significant. He is already showing 11 points in Gallup and 6 in Rasmussen. He's leading 54-44 among likely voters in Gallup. This is something I honestly never thought that I'd see.
(4) Don't believe people who tell you that they know what the day-to-day subsample results are. Even without taking account things like rounding, it is simply impossible to do. Period. (some people are finally letting on to this).
(5) The interesting results from the Palin pick will come when we start to get state polling in the next couple days. I'm not certain that she won't help carry a state. Remember, McCain's lead in Alaska was uncharacteristically (for a Republican) in the single digits. Remember how Obama and Dean sent a bunch of field organizers to Alaska? And they might make it close? Not so much anymore.
In general, Republicans' biggest erosion has come in the Mountain West and Upper Plains/Midwest. Remember, polling was showing Obama doing unusually well compared to 2004 in states like the Dakotas, Montana, Colorado, and even Wyoming, Utah and Idaho (though McCain still led handily there). I think the representation of another Mountain West governor, to go with the Mountain West Senator should help.
And will Palin's unusual accent, which rings of a Dakota/Minnesota accent, help out there?
(6) The really interesting results are going to come in polls for Senate and House races. The main thing about the Republican convention and the Palin pick (and the unfair, unfounded attacks on her) is that the Republican party, for the first time in three years, is energized. The importance of that can't be underestimated. For Republicans running in Republican-leaning states or districts -- and that is a large majority of vulnerable Senate and House seats this term -- regular Republican turnout dedicated to electing a Republican ticket (as opposed to just stopping a Democratic President) could make a real difference.
Anyway, you'll be hearing more from me now that we're past the Labor Day weekend. It's on.
- Sean Oxendine's blog
- Login or register to post comments


Comments
What Accent?
I never noticed any accent.
McCain's Surge in the polls
Based on the tracking polls, both McCain and Obama got negative bounces from their veep picks. This is interesting, but perhaps not surprising.
I am not sure you can say that because there was the Obama convention bounce that was playing as well.
A weekend Gallup has McCain up 10 points, 54-44%. That's a huge 10 day swing. I also didn't expect it to be that big. The other significant thing was that even when Obama had his bounce in Gallup it was 49-42... He never cracked 50%. It's as if there is a ceiling for Obama. With a 54% result, McCain doesnt have that ceiling. He is poaching Democrats, holding Republicans (thanks to Palin and the new energy), and must be based on the numbers winning the independents.
Palin effect? Can she help in CO and MI? Those are 2 battleground states she could influence. (No, McCain had Alaska sewn up.) I would check the CO polls. If McCain has a big bounce there, then Palin will help him win the White House.
As you track the polls I think the #1 important poll indicator will be party affiliation. If the GOP affiliation numbers strengthen, it will be a good sign that Republican voters are more energized and will turnout.
I must admit. . .
. . .some confusion as to the "negative bounce" phenomenon. I'm not saying you're wrong, but I'm going to need it explained. My initial impulse is to think that "negative bounce" means a cratering in preference. That's not what I've seen, so I assume it means something other than what I think it means.
Could you elaborate?